Advertisement

International Conference on Theory and Application of Diagrams

Diagrams 2014: Diagrammatic Representation and Inference pp 93-107 | Cite as

How Communicative Learning Situations Influence Students’ Use of Diagrams: Focusing on Spontaneous Diagram Construction and Protocols during Explanation

  • Yuri Uesaka
  • Emmanuel Manalo
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8578)

Abstract

Although diagrams have been shown to be effective tools for promoting understanding and successful problem solving, students’ poor diagram use has been identified as a serious issue in educational practice-related reports. To enhance students’ diagram construction skills and to address problems in diagram use, creating learning situations that make it inevitable for students to use diagrams would likely be helpful. To realize this, communicative learning situations can be considered a viable option, as students would feel a greater necessity to use diagrams as a consequence of feedback they receive while explaining. Thus, this study examined the hypothesis that an interactive peer instructional learning situation would better promote students’ spontaneous diagram use compared to a non-interactive situation. Eighty-eight university students were randomly assigned to one of two conditions: interactive and non-interactive. After reading a passage relating to the science and engineering area, participants in the interactive condition were requested to explain the content of the passage to another participant next to them. In contrast, participants in the non-interactive condition were asked to record an explanation using an IC recorder by imagining that they were explaining to another person. A sheet of paper was provided to participants during the explanation, and diagram use on the paper was analyzed. The results revealed that students’ diagram use in the interactive condition was higher than in the non-interactive condition. This indicates that teachers’ provision of interactive communication situations can effectively promote students’ likelihood of using diagrams spontaneously.

Keywords

communicative learning situation spontaneous diagram construction diagram use in explanations peer interaction learning strategies 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ainsworth, S., Prain, V., Tytler, R.: Drawing to Learn in Science. Science 333, 1096–1097 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Larkin, J.H., Simon, H.A.: Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words. Cognitive Science 11, 65–99 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stern, E., Aprea, C., Ebner, H.G.: Improving Cross-content Transfer in Text Processing by Means of Active Graphical Representation. Leaning and Instruction 13, 191–203 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Butcher, K.R.: Learning from Text with Diagrams: Promoting Mental Model Development and Inference Generation. Journal of Educational Psychology 98, 182–197 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mayer, R.E.: Multimedia Learning. Cambridge Univ. Press, New York (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    van Essen, G., Hamaker, C.: Using Self-Generated Drawing to Solve Arithmetic Word-Problems. Journal of Educational Research 83, 301–312 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hembree, R.: Experiments and Relational Studies in Problem-solving: A Meta-analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 23, 242–273 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Uesaka, Y.: Suugakuteki mondaikaiketu ni okeru zuhyou katuyou no shien (Supporting Students’ Use of Diagrams in Mathematics Problem Solving: Development of the “REAL Approach” which Connects Theories and Practices). Kazamashobo, Tokyo (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dufour-Janvier, B., Bednarz, N., Belanger, M.: Pedagogical Considerations Concerning the Problem of Representation. In: Janvier, C. (ed.) Problems of Representation in the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics, pp. 110–120. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1987)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Uesaka, Y., Manalo, E., Ichikawa, S.: What Kinds of Perceptions and Daily Learning Behaviors Promote Students’ Use of Diagrams in Mathematics Problem Solving? Learning and Instruction 17, 322–335 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Uesaka, Y., Manalo, E., Ichikawa, S.: The Effects of Perception of Efficacy and Diagram Construction Skills on Students’ Spontaneous Use of Diagrams When Solving Math Word Problems. In: Goel, A.K., Jamnik, M., Narayanan, N.H. (eds.) Diagrams 2010. LNCS, vol. 6170, pp. 197–211. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chan, L.K.S.: Combined Strategy and Attributional Training for Seventh Grade Average and Poor Readers. Journal of Research in Reading 19, 111–127 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brown, A.L., Bransford, J.D., Ferrara, R., Campione, J.A.: Tetrahedral Framework for Exploring Problems of Learning. In: Flavell, J.H., Markman, E.M. (eds.) Handbook of Child Psychology, 4th edn. Cognitive Development, vol. 3, pp. 85–106. Wiley, New York (1983)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ueki, R.: Structure of High-School Students’ Beliefs About Learning. The Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology 50, 301–310 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shinogaya, K.: Effects of Preparation on Learning: Interaction With Beliefs About Learning. The Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology 56, 256–267 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lyon, J.: Drawing: Its Value as a Communication Aid for Adults with Aphasia. Aphasiology 9, 33–50 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sacchett, C.: Drawing in Aphasia: Moving Towards the Interactive. Human-Computer Studies 57, 263–277 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Palincsar, A.S., Brown, A.L.: Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-fostering and Comprehension Monitoring Activities. Cognition and Instruction 1, 117–175 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Manalo, E., Uesaka, Y.: Elucidating the Mechanism of Spontaneous Diagram Use in Explanations: How Cognitive Processing of Text and Diagrammatic Representations Are Influenced by Individual and Task-Related Factors. In: Cox, P., Plimmer, B., Rodgers, P. (eds.) Diagrams 2012. LNCS, vol. 7352, pp. 35–50. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Snell, M.E., Janney, R. (eds.): Social Relationships and Peer Support. Brookes Publishing, Baltimore (2000)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Miyake, N.: Constructive Interaction and the Iterative Process of Understanding. Cognitive Science 10, 151–177 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Uesaka, Y., Manalo, E., Nakagawa, M.: Are Teachers Aware of Students’ Lack of Spontaneity in Diagram Use? Suggestions from a Mathematical Model-Based Analysis of Teachers’ Predictions. In: Cox, P., Plimmer, B., Rodgers, P. (eds.) Diagrams 2012. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7352, pp. 312–314. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Uesaka, Y., Manalo, E.: Peer Instruction as a Way of Promoting Spontaneous Use of Diagrams When Solving Math Word Problems. In: McNamara, D.S., Trafton, J.G. (eds.) Proceedings of the 29th Annual Cognitive Science Society, pp. 677–682. Cognitive Science Society, Austin (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yuri Uesaka
    • 1
  • Emmanuel Manalo
    • 2
  1. 1.Graduate School of EducationThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Faculty of Science and EngineeringWaseda UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations