Advertisement

Estimation of Risk Increase Caused by Parallelisation of Product Development Processes

  • N. Szélig
  • M. Schabacker
  • S. Vajna
Conference paper

Abstract

In the ever-changing technological and economic environment, time plays an increasingly important role. Only those products can be successful and competitive, which come to market at the right time. Several studies have shown that in the development of series products a delayed market launch is more expensive than an increase of the development costs.

Keywords

Process Element Risk Increase Product Development Process Technical Drawing Resource Density 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Atkinson, R. (1999) Project management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 17 (6) pp. 337–342Google Scholar
  2. DIN 69901 (2009) Projektmanagement; Projektmanagementsysteme, 2009-01Google Scholar
  3. Freund J., Rücker, B. (2010) Praxishandbuch BPMN 2.0, 2. Aktualisierte Auflage, Carl Hanser Verlag München Wien, pp. 8-17, 28Google Scholar
  4. Freisleben, D. (2001) Gestaltung und Optimierung von Produktentwicklungsprozessen mit einem wissensbasierten Vorgehensmodell, Buchreihe Integrierte Produktentwicklung, Band 2, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität MagdeburgGoogle Scholar
  5. Hammer, M., Champy, J. (1995) Business Reengineering: Die Radikalkur für das Unternehmen, 5. Auflage, Campus-Verlag, Frankfurt/MainGoogle Scholar
  6. Hammer, M., Champy, J. (1993) Reengineering the Corporation, Harperbusiness, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Hänggi, R. (1996) Risikomanagement und Simultaneous Engineering; St. Gallen, Univ.; DissertationGoogle Scholar
  8. Knight, F. (1921) Risk, uncertainty, and profit. Boston, USA: Hart, Schaffner & Marx, Houghton Mifflin CompanyGoogle Scholar
  9. Melboldt, M., Matthiesen, S., Lohmeyer, Q. (2012) “The Dilema of Managing Iterations in Time-to-market Development Processes”. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Modelling and Management Engineering Processes (MMEP 2012), Cambridge, United Kingdom, pp. 85-97Google Scholar
  10. Rick, T. (2007) “Gépipari terméktervezési folyamatok erőforrás és költségszempontú optimálása a termékstruktúra figyelembevételével”. PhD Thesis, Budapesti Műszaki és Gazdaságtudományi Egyetem, Gépszerkezettani Intézet, Budapest, pp. 27-32Google Scholar
  11. Schabacker, M. (2001) Bewertung der Nutzen neuer Technologien in der Produktentwicklung. Buchreihe Integrierte Produktentwicklung (ed Vajna, S.), Band 1, Otto-von- Guericke-Universität MagdeburgGoogle Scholar
  12. Schabacker, M. (2010) “PDM-Systeme: Wirtschaftlichkeitsberechnung von PDM/PLMInvestitionen“. PLM-Jahrbuch 2011, Hoppenstedt Publishing GmbH, pp. 62-65Google Scholar
  13. Schabacker, M., Szélig, N., Vajna, S. (2013) “Suitable Methods for Process Modeling and Process Optimization”. Proceedings of 2013 ICED: International Conference on Engineering Design, 19-22 August 20013, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea, ICED13/176Google Scholar
  14. Schabacker, M., Wohlbold, L. (2002) “Benefit Evaluation of EDM/PDM Systems”. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising 17-19 June 2002, Rome, Italy, pp. 413-420Google Scholar
  15. Seiler, H. (1995) Rechtsfragen technischer Risiken - Aufsätze zum Thema Risikorecht. Zürich: vdfGoogle Scholar
  16. Szélig, N., Schabacker, M., Vajna, S. (2012) „Determing the Degree of Parallelisation of Processes in a Tri-process-modelling-tool”. Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Modelling and Management Engineering Processes (MMEP 2012), Cambridge, United Kingdom, pp. 119-129Google Scholar
  17. Vajna, S., Clement, St., Jordan, A., Bercsey, T. (2005) “The Autogenetic Design Theory: An Evolutionary View of the Design Process”. Journal of Engineering Design 16, 4, pp. 423- 440Google Scholar
  18. Vajna, S., Kittel, K., Bercsey, T. (2011) “The Autogenetic Design Theory-Product development as an Analogy to Biological Evolution”. The Future of Design Methodology, Springer Verlag, pp. 169-179Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. Szélig
    • 1
  • M. Schabacker
    • 1
  • S. Vajna
    • 1
  1. 1.Otto-von-Guericke-Universität MagdeburgMagdeburgGermany

Personalised recommendations