Advertisement

Neuere Aspekte der Virus-Interferenz

  • J. Lindenmann
Conference paper
Part of the Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology book series (CT MICROBIOLOGY, volume 33)

Zusammenfassung

Eine souveräne Literaturübersicht über das gesamte Gebiet der Virus-Interferenz wurde 1950 von W. Henle veröffentlicht; spätere Sammelreferate stammen u. a. von Lennette (1951), Schlesinger (1959a, b), Isaacs (1959a) und Isaacs u. Burke (1959). Interferenzähnliche Erscheinungen sind auf zahlreichen Gebieten der Mikrobiologie beobachtet worden, so bei den Bakteriophagen (s. z. B. Delbrück u. Luria 1942), bei den Viren der höheren Pflanzen (s. z. B. Bennett 1951), bei den Rickettsien (s. z. B. Price 1953), bei den Bakterien (s. z. B. Galliard, Lapierre u. Rousset 1958), bei den Pilzen (S. z. B. Salvin u. Bell 1955) und bei den Protozoen (s. z. B. Tyzzer 1941). Hier soll ausschließlich von Interferenzphänomenen bei den tierischen Viren die Rede sein, wobei offen bleiben mag, ob man sich bei einem Vergleich mehr durch die Ähnlichkeit oder durch die Verschiedenheit der oben angedeuteten Erscheinungen beeindrucken lassen soll.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Andrewes, C. H.: Interference by one virus with the growth of another in tissue-culture. Brit. J. exp. Path. 23, 214 (1942).Google Scholar
  2. Andrewes, C. H., and W. J. Elford: Infectious ectromelia. Experiments on interference and immunisation. Brit. J. exp. Path. 28, 278 (1947).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrewes, C. H., W. J. Elford: and J. S. F. Niven: Vaccinia and ectromelia in the mouse. Brit. J. exp. Path. 29, 329 (1948).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Baluda, M. A.: Homologous interference by ultraviolet-inactivated Newcastle disease virus. Virology 4, 72 (1957).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baluda, M. A.: Loss of viral receptors in homologous interference by ultraviolet-irradiated Newcastle disease virus. Virology 7, 315 (1959).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baron, S., and K. E. Jensen: Evidence for genetic interaction between non-infectious and infectious influenza A viruses. J. exp. Med. 102, 677 (1955).PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bennett, C. W.: Interference phenomena between plant viruses. Ann Rev. Microbiol. 5, 295 (1951).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burke, D. C., and A. Isaacs: Further studies on interferon. Brit. J. exp. Path. 39, 78 (1958).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Burke, D. C., and A. Isaacs: Some factors affecting the production of interferon. Brit. J. exp. Path. 39, 452 (1958).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Burnet, F. M.: Haemagglutination in relation to host cell-virus interaction. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 6, 229 (1952).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burnet, F. M.: Enzyme, antigen and virus. Cambridge 1956.Google Scholar
  12. Burnet, F. M., and P. E. Lind: Reactivation of heat inactivated influenza virus by recombination. Aust J. exp. Biol. med. Sci. 32, 133 (1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cairns, H. J. F.: Quantitative aspects of influenza virus multiplication. Iii. Average liberation time. J. Immunol. 69, 168 (1952).Google Scholar
  14. Cairns, H. J. F.: The asynchrony of infection by influenza virus. Virology 3, 1 (1957).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cairns, H. J. F., and S. Fazekas DE ST. Groth: The number of allantoic cells in the chick embryo. J. Immunol. 78, 191 (1957).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Cantell, K.: Investigations on mumps virus. Propagation of mumps virus in chick embryos during serial allantoic passages with undiluted inocula. Ann. Med. exp. Fenn. 37, Suppl. 1 (1959).Google Scholar
  17. Cooper, P. D., and A. J. D. Bellett: J. gen. Microbiol. (im Druck).Google Scholar
  18. Deinhardt, F., V. V. Bergs, G. Henle and W. Henle: Studies on persistent infections of tissue cultures. Iii. Some quantitative aspects of host cell-virus interactions. J. exp. Med. 108, 573 (1958).PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. DelbrÜCK, M., and S. E. Luria: Interference between bacterial viruses. I. Interference between two bacterial viruses acting upon the same host and the mechanism of virus growth. Arch. Biochem. 1, Ill (1942).Google Scholar
  20. Depoux, R., and A. Isaacs: Interference between influenza and vaccinia viruses. Brit. J. exp. Path. 35, 415 (1954).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Doerr, R.: Die Schienenimmunisierung. Klin. Wschr. 15, 1062 (1936).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Doerr, R., S. Seidenberg: Die Konkurrenz von Virusinfektionen im Zentralnervensystem (Phänomen von FL. Magrassi). Z. Hyg. Infekt.-Kr. 119, 135 (1937).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Drake, J. W.: Interference and multiplicity reactivation in polioviruses. Virology 6, 244 (1958).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fazekas DE ST., Groth, S., and H. J. F. Cairns: Quantitative aspects of influenza virus multiplication. IV. Definition of constants and general discussion. J. Immunol. 69, 173 (1952).Google Scholar
  25. Fazekas ST., and M. Edney: Quantitative aspects of influenza virus multiplication. II. Heterologous interference. J. Immunol. 69, 160 (1952).Google Scholar
  26. Fazekas ST., A. Isaacs and M. Edney: Multiplication of influenza virus under conditions of interference. Nature (Lond.) 170, 573 (1952).Google Scholar
  27. Fazekas ST., and D. O. White: An improved assay for the infectivity of influenza viruses. J.’ Hyg. (Lond.) 56, 151 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Findlay, G. M., and F. O. Maccallum: An interference phenomenon in relation to yellow fever and other viruses. J. Path. Bact. 44, 405 (1937).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Finter, N. B., O. C. Liu and W. Henle: Studies on host-virus interactions in the chick embryo-influenza virus system. X. An experimental analysis of the von Magnus phenomenon. J. exp. Med. 101, 461 (1955).Google Scholar
  30. Fong, J.: Sulfur mustard-inactivated influenza virus as interfering agent. J. Immunol. 71, 241 (1953).Google Scholar
  31. Fulton, F., and P. Armitage: Surviving tissue suspensions for influenza virus titration. J. Hyg. (Lond.) 49, 247 (1951).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fulton, F., and A. Isaacs: Influenza virus multiplication in the chick chorio-allantoic membrane. J. gen. Microbiol. 9, 119 (1953).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Galliard, H., J. Lapierre, J.-J. Rousset: Comportement spécifique de différentes espèces de borrelia au cours de l’infection mixte avec trypanosoma brucei. Son utilisation comme test d’identification des spirochètes récurrentes. Ann. Parasit. hum. comp. 33, 177 (1958).Google Scholar
  34. Gard, S.: Tissue immunity in mouse poliomyelitis. Acta med. stand. 119, 27 (1944).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gard, S., and P. Von Magnus: Studies on interference in experimental influenza. II. Purification and centrifugation experiments. Ark. Kemi, Mineral. Geol. B 24, No 8 (1947).Google Scholar
  36. Gledhill, A. W.: The interference of mouse hepatitis virus with ectromelia in mice and a possible explanation of its mechanism. Brit. J. exp. Path. 40, 291 (1959).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Henle, W.: Studies on host-virus interactions in the chick embryo-influenza virus system. II. The propagation of virus in conjunction with host cells. J. exp. Med. 90, 13 (1949).PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Henle, W.: Interference phenomena between animal viruses: A review. J. Immunol. 64, 203 (1950).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Henle, W., and G. Henle: Interference of inactive virus with the propagation of virus of influenza. Science 98, 87 (1943).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Henle, W., and G. Henle: The effect of ultraviolet irradiation on various properties of influenza viruses. J. exp. Med. 85, 347 (1947).PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Henle, W., G. Henle, F. Deinhardt and V. V. Bergs: Studies on persistent infections of tissue cultures. IV. Evidence for the production of an interferon in Mcn cells by myxoviruses. J. exp. Med. 110, 525 (1959).PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Henle, W., G. Henle, and M. W. Klrber: Interference between inactive and active viruses of influenza. V. Effect of irradiated virus on the host cell. Amer. J. med. Sci. 214, 529 (1947).Google Scholar
  43. Henle, W., G. Henle, and E. B. Rosenberg: The demonstration of one-step growth curves of influenza viruses through the blocking effect of irradiated virus on further infection. J. exp. Med. 86, 423 (1947).PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Henle, W., and O. C. Liu: Studies on host-virus interactions in the chick embryo-influenza virus system. VI. Evidence for multiplicity reactivation of inactivated virus. J. exp. Med. 94, 305 (1951).PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Henle, W., O. C. Liu: and N. B. Finter: Studies on host-virus interactions in the chick embryo-influenza virus system. IX. The period of liberation of virus from infected cells. J. exp. Med. 100, 53 (1954).Google Scholar
  46. Henle, W., and K. Paucker: Interference between inactivated and active influenza viruses in the chick embryo. I. A re-evaluation of factors of dosage and timing using infectivity titration for assay. Virology 6, 181 (1958).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Henle, W., and E. B. Rosenberg: One-step growth curves of various strains of influenza A and B viruses and their inhibition by inactivated virus of homologous type. J. exp. Med. 89, 279 (1949).PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ho, M., and J. F. Enders: An inhibitor of viral activity appearing in infected cell cultures. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.) 45, 385 (1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Horsfall jr., F. L.: On the reproduction of influenza virus. Quantitative studies with procedures which enumerate infective and hemagglutinating virus particles. J. exp. Med. 100, 135 (1954).PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hoskins, M.: A protective action of neurotropic against viscerotropic yellow fever virus in macacus rhesus. Amer. J. trop. Med. 15, 675 (1935).Google Scholar
  51. Isaacs, A.: Persönliche Mitteilung 1956.Google Scholar
  52. Isaacs, A.: Viral interference. Symp. Soc. gen. Microbiol. 9, 102 (1959).Google Scholar
  53. Isaacs, A.: Biological aspects of intracellular stages of virus growth. In: The viruses ( BuRnet and Stanley ). New York 1959.Google Scholar
  54. Isaacs, A.: Action of interferon on the growth of sublethally irradiated virus. Virology 9, 56 (1959).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Isaacs, A.: Persönliche Mitteilung 1959.Google Scholar
  56. Isaacs, A., and D. C. Burke: Mode of action of interferon. Nature (Lond.) 182, 1073 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Isaacs, A., and D. C. Burke: Viral interference and interferon. Brit. med. Bull. (im Druck).Google Scholar
  58. Isaacs, A., D. C. Burke: and L. Fadeeva: Effect of interferon on the growth of viruses on the chick chorion. Brit. J. exp. Path. 39, 447 (1958).Google Scholar
  59. Isaacs, A., and M. Edney: Interference between inactive and active influenza virus in the chick embryo. I. Quantitative aspects of interference. Aust. J. exp. Biol. med. Sci. 28, 219 (1950).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Isaacs, A.: Interference between inactive and active influenza viruses in the chick embryo. II. The site of interference. Aust. J. exp. Biol. med. Sci. 28, 231 (1950).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Isaacs, A.: Interference between inactive and active influenza viruses in the chick embryo. IV. The early stages of virus multiplication and interference. Aust. J. exp. Biol. med. Sci. 28, 635 (1950).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Isaacs, A.: Interference between inactive and active influenza viruses in the chick embryo. V. The behaviour of different strains of challenge virus. Aust. J. exp. Biol. med. Sci. 29, 169 (1951).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Isaacs, A.: Interference between inactive and active influenza viruses in the chick embryo. VI. The behaviour of different strains of interfering virus. Aust. J. exp. Biol. med. Sci. 29, 179 (1951).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Isaacs, A., and J. Lindenmann: Virus interference. I. The interferon. Proc. roy. Soc. B 147, 258 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Isaacs, A., J. Lindenmann, R. C. Valentine: Unveröffentlichte Arbeiten 1956.Google Scholar
  66. Isaacs, A., J. Lindenmann, R. C. Valentine: Virus interference. II. Some properties of interferon. Proc. roy. Soc. B 147, 268 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Isaacs, A., and M. A. Westwood: Inhibition by interferon of the growth of vaccinia virus in the rabbit skin. Lancet 1959II, 324 (1959).Google Scholar
  68. Isaacs, A., and M. A. Westwood: Im Druck (1959).Google Scholar
  69. Lennette, E. H.: Interference between animal viruses. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 5, 277 (1951).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Lennette, E. H., and H. Korrowsni: Interference between viruses in tissue culture. J. exp. Med. 83, 195 (1946).PubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Levine, S.: Dynamics of heterologous interference between viable viruses in chick embryo fibroblast monolayers. Virology 5, 150 (1958).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Lind, P. E., and F. M. Buirnet: Further studies of recombination between heat inactivated virus and active virus. Aust. J. exp. Biol. med. Sci. 35, 531 (1957).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Lindenmann, J.: Interferon und inverse Interferenz. Z. Hyg. Infekt.-Kr. Im Druck (1960).Google Scholar
  74. Lindenmann, J., D. C. Burke and A. Isaacs: Studies on the production, mode of action and properties of interferon. Brit. J. exp. Path. 38, 551 (1957).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Lindenmann, J., A. Isaacs: Versuche fiber Virus-Interferenz. Schweiz. Z. allg. Path. 20, 640 (1957).Google Scholar
  76. Liu, O. C., K. Paucker and W. Henle: Studies on host-virus interactions in the chick embryo-influenza virus system. Xiii Some aspects of non-infectious virus production. J. exp. Med. 103, 777 (1956).PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Magnus, P. v.: Studies on interference in experimental influenza. I. Biological observations. Ark. Kemi, Mineral. Geol. B 24, No 7 (1947).Google Scholar
  78. Magnus, P. v.: Incomplete forms of influenza virus. Advanc. Virus Res. 2, 59 (1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Magrassi, F.: Studii sull’immunità da virus erpetico. Nota Iii. Rapporti tra infezione e superinfezione di fronte ai processi immunitari: sulla possibilità di profondamente modificare il decorso egli esiti del processo infettivo già in atto. Z. Hyg. Infekt.-Kr. 117, 573 (1935).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Mims, C. A.: Rift Valley fever virus in mice. IV. Incomplete virus; its production and properties. Brit. J. exp. Path. 37, 129 (1956).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Mooser, H., J. Lindenmann: Homologe Interferenz durch hitzeinaktiviertes, an Erythrozyten adsorbiertes Influenza B-Virus. Experientia (Basel) 13, 147 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Nagano, Y., Y. Kojima: Inhibition de l’infection vaccinale par un facteur liquide dans le tissu infecté par le virus homologue. C. R. Soc. Biol. (Paris) 152, 1627 (1958).Google Scholar
  83. Nicolau, S.: La para-immunité (résistance non-spécifique acquise) dans les maladies à ultravirus. Rev. Immunol. (Paris) 4, 263 (1938).Google Scholar
  84. Paucker, K., and W. Henle: Studies on host-virus interactions in the chick embryo-influenza virus system. XI. The effect of partial inactivation of standard seed virus at 37° C upon the progeny. J. exp. Med. 101, 479 (1955).PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Paucker, K., and W. Henle: Interference between inactivated and active influenza virus in the chick embryo. II.Interference by incomplete forms of influenza virus. Virology 6, 198 (1958).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Porterfield, J. S.: A simple plaque inhibition test for antiviral agents: Application to assay of interferon. Lancet 1959I1, 326.Google Scholar
  87. Powell, W. F., and E. C. Pollard: The effect of ionizing radiation on the interfering property of influenza virus. Virology 2, 321 (1956).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Powell, W. F., and R. B. Setlow: The effect of monochromatic ultraviolet radiation on the interfering property of influenza virus. Virology 2, 337 (1956).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Price, W. H.: Interference phenomenon in animal infections with rickettsiae of Rocky Mountain spotted fever. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.) 82, 180 (1953).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Rickard, E. R., and T. Francis jr.: The demonstration of lesions and virus in the lungs of mice receiving large intraperitoneal inoculations of epidemic influenza virus. J. exp. Med. 67, 953 (1938).PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Sagik, B., T. Puck and S. Levine: Quantitative aspects of the spontaneous elution of influenza virus from red cells. J. exp. Med. 99, 251 (1954).PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Salvin, S. B., and E. J. Bell: Resistance of mice with experimental histoplasmosis to infection with rickettsia typhi. J. Immunol 75, 57 (1955).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Schlesinger, R. W.: Incomplete growth cycle of influenza virus in mouse brain. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.) 74, 541 (1950).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1960

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Lindenmann
    • 1
  1. 1.Hygiene-Institut der Universität ZürichSchweiz

Personalised recommendations