The Selection Of Astronauts Including Dynamic Testing

  • W. Randolph LovelaceII
  • Ulrich C. Luft
  • Albert H. Schwichtenberg
  • Thomas O. Nevison
  • Robert Proper
  • Emanuel M. Roth
  • G. Stanley Woodson


The present status of a continuing thirteen year problem of comprehensive special examination and evaluation procedures for the determination of the physical, mental and social well-being of preselected, highly motivated, and experienced test pilots and astronauts will be reviewed. These subjects repeatedly had proven their ability to withstand the stresses of flight while performing their missions. During these years a group of clinicians and scientists who are biologically, physically and medically oriented have acquired a broad interdisciplinary approach to such examinations.

It is anticipated that highly trained and proven scientists will ultimately become one of the members of a spacecraft crew. Of necessity they will need to participate in a fairly large portion of the astronaut training program. Prior to their examination and selection these men will not have been exposed to the stresses of flight so their reaction to such stresses will be unknown, and thus the selection process will be more difficult. The Gemini program will be most helpful in the final selection, indoctrination, and training of scientists as they can go along on orbital flights with an experienced astronaut.

The success of the total examination program is attested to by the performance and reliability of the X-15 and Mercury crews.

Present methods for obtaining the candidates past history including aviation and space experience, scientific accomplishments, and the family medical history will be given. Following this will be a report on the physical examination including examinations by medical and surgical specialists who are endeavouring to detect and evaluate even the slightest deviation from normal. Present contemplated laboratory and radiological procedures will be given, including micro-techniques for the determination of blood chemistries and the use of supersensitive intensifiyng screens and television observation for special radiological studies.

Luft’s experience on tests to determine the general work capacity, physical condition and cardiopulmonary competence will be presented. Objective estimates of an individual’s physical competence are made by measuring the oxygen consumption when performing exercise at a maximal level. Under these circumstances the limiting factors are 1) the quantity of active tissue involved in the production of energy, 2) the quality of cellular metabolism, and 3) the ability of the circulation and respiration to meet metabolic demands for oxygen. The physical condition of the individual depends primarily on the functional factors 2) and 3) and can be determined more precisely if variability attributable to the quantity of active tissue is taken into account. These studies, among other information, revealed that the maximal oxygen intake per unit of lean body mass varies with the potassium content of the latter.

The program for subsequent periodic examinations will be in addition to constant and continuing medical observation and care. Repeat examinations will include an interval history and relevant laboratory, roentgenologic and physical competence tests. Past histories and records will be very valuable sids. Special emphasis will be placed on the progress of any previously discovered minor pathological processes. Those individuals eliminated from the flight program will still be highly valuable members of the operational staff.

After the annual examination program goes on for several years, an attempt will be made to correlate psychological, physiological and anatomical characteristics with chronological age. A critical load can then be imposed on any deteriorating function. The use of electronic computers will facilitate data acquisition, storage, retrieval and study.

It would be most helpful to all concerned to have an International Advisory Council representing the various clinical and scientific disciplines. Such a group would have the responsibility for disseminating existing knowledge and for continually examining the progress and future requirements of all research concerning the examination and selection of astronauts, including the effect of single as well as combined stresses that occur in space with particular respect to performance degradation of the crew.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    W. R. Lovelace, II, A. H. Schwichtenberg, U. C. Luft, and R. Proper, Selection and Maintenance Program for Astronauts for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Aerospace Med. 33, 667–684 (1962).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    N. M. Sissakian, Problems of Biology and Cosmic Flight. Vestnik Akad. Nauk, SSSR, 30, 15–24 (1960).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    V. V. Parin, and O. G. Gazenko, Soviet Experiments Aimed at Investigating the Influence of the Space Flight Factors on the Organism of Animals and Man. Third International Space Science Program of the Committee on Space Research, pp. 1-23, May 1962.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    V. V. Parin, and E. I. Yazdovsky, The Main Results of the USSR Biological Researches in Connection of the Space Flights and the Perspectives of Space Physiology and Medicine. Presented at 12th International Congress of the International Union of Physiological Sciences, Sept. 10-17, 1962.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J.Glenn, Jr., Speech presented at Annual Symposium and Banquet of the Society of Experimental Test Pilots, Sept. 28-29, 1962.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    I. Ravdin, Personal Communication.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    L. B. Lusted, and R. S. Ledley, Mathematical Models in Medical Diagnosis. J. Med. Educ. 35, 214 (1960).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    G. S. Woodson, and V. N. Slee, Statistics and Medical Writing. J. Mich. State Med. Soc. 60, 222 (1961).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    H. P. Rome, Symposium on Automation Technics - Rationale. Proc. Mayo Clin. 37, 61–64 (1962).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. H. Schwichtenberg, D. D. Flickinger, and W. R. Lovelace, II, Development and Use of Medical Machine Record Cards in Astronaut Selection. U.S.Armed Forces Med.J. 10, 1324 (1959).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    E. T. Carter, and J. H. Tillisch, Re-evaluation of the Medical and Physical Standards for Pilots. Aerospace Med. Panel of Advis. Group for Aero. Res. and Develop., pp. 1-34, July 23, 1961.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ch. van Riper, Speech Correction; Principles and Methods, 3rd ed., pp. 178-179. New York: Prentice-Hall, 1954.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. H. Graybiel, Personal Communication.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    R. S. Kennedy, and A. H. Graybiel, Validity of Tests of Canal Sickness in Predicting Susceptibility of Airsickness and Seasickness. Aerospace Med. 33, 935–938 (1962).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    G. de j. Lee, and T. M. D. Gimlette, A Simple Test for Interatrial Communication. Brit. Med. J. 1, 1278 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    C.W. Sem-Jacobsen, Electroencephalographic Study of Pilot Stresses in Flight. Aerospace Med. 30, 797 (1959).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    E.C. Anderson, R.L. Schuch, J.D. Perings, and W.H. Langham, The Los Alamos Human Counter. Nucleonics 14, 26 (1956).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    E. A. Pinson, and W.H. Langham, Physiology and Toxicology in Tritium in Man. J. Appl. Physiol. 10, 108 (1957).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    W.H. Langham, W. J. Eversole, F. N. Hayes, and T. T. Trujillo, Assay of Tritium Activity in Body Fluids with Use of a Liquid Scintillation System. J. Lab. Clin. Med.47, 819 (1956).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    P.R. Schloerb, B. J. Friis-Hansen, I.S. Edelman, A.K. Solomon, and F. D. Moore, The Measurement of Total Body Water in the Human Subject by Deuterium Oxide Dilution; with a Consideration of the Dynamics of Deuterium Distribution. J. Clin. Invest. 29, 1296 (1950).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    F. M. Sones, Cine-coronary Arteriography. Ohio State Med.J. 58, 1018–1019 (1962).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    A. Keys, and J. Brozek, Body Fat in Adult Man. Physiol. Rev. 33, 245–325 (1953).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    E.F. Osserman, G. C. Pitts, W. C. Welham, and A. R. Behnke, In vivo Measurement of Body Fat and Body Water in a Group of Normal Men. J. Appl. Physiol. 2, 633–639 (1950).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    W.v. Döbeln, Maximal Oxygen Intake, Body Size and Total Hemoglobin in Normal Man. Acta Physiol. Scand. 38, 193 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    T. Sjöstrand, A Method for the Determination of the Total Haemoglobin Content of the Body. Acta Physiol. Scand. 16, 211 (1948).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    W. v. Döbeln, A Simple Bicycle Ergometer. J. Appl. Physiol. 7, 222 (1954).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    S. Pacaud, and F. Milhaud, Contribution à. l’étude de la structure des fonctions psychologiques et à l’ étude de leur groupement en constellations. J. Soc. Statist. Paris 99, 198–237 (1958).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    W. F. Enos, R. H. Holmes, and J. Beyer, Coronary Disease among United States Soldiers Killed in Action in Korea. JAMA 152, 1090–1093 (1953).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    H. Klensch, and W. Eger, Ein neues Verfahren der physikalischen Schlagvolumenbestimmung. (Quantitative Ballistographie. ) Pflüger’s Arch, ges. Physiol. 263, 459 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    J. L. Nickerson, and H. J. Curtis, The Design of the Ballistocardiograph. Amer. J. Physiol. 142, 1 (1944).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    A. Benchimol, E. G. Dimond, and J. C. Carson, The Value of Apexcardiogram as a Reference Tracing in Phonocardiography. Amer. Heart J. 61, 485–493 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    C.M. Agress, L.G. Fields, S. Wegner, M. Wilburne, M. D. Shickman, and R. M. Muller, The Normal Vibrocardiogram; Physiologic Variations and Relation to Cardiodynamic Events. Amer. J. Cardiol. 8, 22–30 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    L. M. Rosa, and A. A. Luisada, Low Frequency Tracings of Precordial Displacement and Acceleration; Technical Comparison of Various Systems. Amer. J. Cardiol. 4, 669–674 (1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    W. R. Lovelace, II, and A. S. Crossfield, Biomedical Aspects of Orbital Flight, in Physics and Medicine in the Atmosphere and Space, by O. O. Benson, Jr., and H. Strughold, pp. 447-463. New York: J.Wiley & Sons, 1960.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 1965

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Randolph LovelaceII
    • 1
  • Ulrich C. Luft
    • 1
  • Albert H. Schwichtenberg
    • 1
  • Thomas O. Nevison
    • 1
  • Robert Proper
    • 1
  • Emanuel M. Roth
    • 1
  • G. Stanley Woodson
    • 1
  1. 1.Lovelace FoundationAlbuquerqueNew MexicoUSA

Personalised recommendations