Physiological Problems Of Weightlessness And Basic Research

  • Otto H. Gauer


Some predictions on the hazards of the weightless conditions which were made jointly with Haber twelve years ago are reviewed in the light of today’s experience and recent advances in basic research. While it is now obvious that weightlessness does not produce overt short term disturbances of the circulation or respiration, questions pertaining to the possible incidence of motion sickness and to chronic effects on the circulation are still open for discussion.

An outline of recent work on the circulatory basis of fluid volume control through intravascular receptors is presented. Originally it was established that the state of filling of the intrathoracic vascular organs has a profound reflex effect on the diuretic response of the kidney mediated through changes of renal hemodynamics, ADH and corticoids. More recent work indicates that by comparison of afferent impulses from many sites of the body with efferent orders to the heart and circulation the CNS performs an evaluation of the “competence” of the heart to deal with the load imposed on the circulation during a day. Loss of “competence” is accompanied by fluid retention, gain by diuresis.

The application of this principle to the state of weightlessness as far as it could be produced in immersion experiments permits the explanation of observed changes in fluid and mineral metabolism which can in turn be related to current concepts of blood volume control.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    O. Gauer and H. Haber, Man Under Gravity-free Conditions. In: Dept. of the Air Force, German Aviation Medicine, World War II. Vol. I. p. 641, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1950.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    H.I. Chinn and P. K. Smith, Motion Sickness. Pharmacol. Rev. 7, 33 (1955).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    O.H. Gauer and H. L. Thron, Properties of Veins in Vivo: Integrated Effects of Their Smoth Muscle. Physiol. Rev. 42, Suppl. 5, 283(1962).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    O. H. Gauer and J. P. Henry, On the Circulatory Basis of Fluid Volume Control. Physiol. Rev. 43, 423 (1963).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    O.H. Gauer, Motion picture “Kreislauf und Fliehkräfte”, 1942.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    O.H. Gauer, Volume Changes of the Left Ventricle During Blood Pooling and Exercise in the Intact Animal. Their Effects on Left Ventricular Performance. Physiol. Rev. 35, 143 (1955).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    H. Miller, M. B. Riley, S. Bondurant and E. P. Hiatt, The Duration of Tolerance to Positive Acceleration. J. Aviat. Med. 30, 360 (1959).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    W. R. Amberson, quoted in C.J. Wiggers, Physiology and Health and Disease, 5th ed., 630 pp. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1950.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. P. Henry and J. W. Pearce, The Possible Role of Cardiac Atrial Stretch Receptors in the Induction of Changes in Urine Flow. J. Physiol. 131, 572 (1956).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    O. H. Gauer, J. P. Henry and H. O. Sieker, Cardiac Receptors and Fluid Volume Control. Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases 4, 1 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    D.E. Graveline and Margaret M. Jackson, Diuresis Associated with Prolonged Water Immersion. J. Appl. Physiol. 17, 519 (1962).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. E. Graveline and B. Balke, The Physiologic Effects of Hypodynamics Induced by Water Immersion. Res. Rep. 60 - 88, 11 pp. USAF School of Aviation Medicine, Brooks AFB, Tex., September 1960.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 1965

Authors and Affiliations

  • Otto H. Gauer
    • 1
  1. 1.Physiological InstituteFree University of BerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations