Advertisement

Research Applications of Projective Methods

  • Jerome L. Singer
Chapter

Abstract

In addressing oneself to a review of the research applications of the projective methods one must confront a curious dilemma of cultural lag and the sociology of professional practice. The widespread practical application of projective techniques continues almost unabated in mental hospitals and clinics. Indeed Sundberg’s (1961) survey indicated that the Rorschach, Thematic Apperception Test, Draw-a-Person and Bender Visual-Motor Gestalt Test (often used projectively) head the list of frequently used assessment techniques in 185 hospitals, counseling centers and clinics. Even today the situation seems relatively unchanged despite increasing doubts about the validity and practical utility of many of these procedures (Zubin et al, 1965). If the research literature on projective techniques tells us anything (and I think it tells a great deal) it clearly suggests that the current clinical uses of those war horses like the Rorschach, TAT, and Figure-Drawing are old-fashioned and unsophisticated either psychometrically or in relation to personality theory. Indeed, the literature on research with the projective methods provides ample evidence that many ingenious modifications and variations of these methods exist and could be better applied in dealing with specific questions such as the prediction of aggressive behavior. Nevertheless, faced with a live patient across the desk, we clinicians cling to our battered original set of inkblots like a three-year-old to his tattered old blanket. Did not Rorschach himself claim he had alternate series of blots? Are we oblivious still to the existence of alternate forms such as the Behn or Holtzman or Harrower series and of the many experimental uses of alternate series for special purposes such as Siipola and Taylor’s (1952) or Barron’s (1955) blots, to mention just a few? The present chapter represents an effort by one who has long loved his fingerprint-bedecked, somewhat battered old “bat” blots and that pathetic “boy with the violin” picture (will he or won’t he pick it up and practice?) to urge upon the reader a serious reexamination of the projective tools. I hope to encourage more imaginative directions in the clinical as well as research applications of these fascinating instruments. Our highest allegiance is to psychology which can best be served not by rash rejection of the projective techniques when the literature is replete with fascinating results or on the other hand by a loyal but naive faith in any given instrument, but by a serious examination of the ways in which a variety of difficult practical and research problems can be solved. An attitude of enlightened curiosity may well lead to experimentation with a host of “projective” or “non-projective” assessment techniques yielding rewards in research knowledge or human welfare.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Antrobus, J. S., & Singer, J. L. Visual signal detection as a function of sequential variability of simultaneous speech. J. experim. Psychol, 1964, 68, 603–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkinson, J. W. (Ed.), Motives in Fantasy, Action and Society. Princeton, N.J.: Van Nostrand, 1958.Google Scholar
  3. Barron, F. Threshold for the perception of human movement in inkblots. J. consult. Psychol, 1955, 19, 33–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bendick, M. R., & Klopfer, W. G. The e?ct of sensory-deprivation and motor inhibition on Rorschach movement responses. J. proj. Tech., 1964, 28, 261–264.Google Scholar
  5. Buss, A. The Psychology of Aggression. New York: Wiley, 1961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carrigan, P. Extraversion-introversion as a dimension of personality: a reappraisal. Psychol Bull, 1960, 57, 329–360.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chein, I., & Evans, M. The movie study game: a projective test of interracial attitudes for use with Negro and white children. Amer. Psychol, 1948, 3, 268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cronbach, L. J. Statistical methods applied to Rorschach scores. Psychol Bull, 1949, 46, 393–429.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cronbach, L. J. Assessment of individual differences. Ann. Rev. Psychol, 1956, 7, 173–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dawo, D. Nachweis psychischer Veränderungen gesunder Frauen während de Men- struation mittels des Rorschach Versuches. Rorschachiana, 1952, 1, 238–249.Google Scholar
  11. De Vos, G. A. A quantitative approach to affective symbolism in Rorschach responses. J. proj. Tech., 1952, 16, 133–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eichler, R. A comparison of the Rorschach and Behn ink-blot tests. J. consult Psychol, 1951, 15, 186–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eiduson, B. T. Structural analysis of dreams: clues to perceptual style. J. abn. soc. Psychol, 1959, 58, 335–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Elizur, A. Content analysis of the Rorschach with regard to anxiety and hostility. J. proj. Tech., 1949, 13, 247–284.Google Scholar
  15. Epley, D., & Ricks, D. Foresight and hindsight in TAT. J. proj. Tech., 1963, 27, 51–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Epstein, S. The measurement of drive and conflict in humans: theory and experiment. In M. R. Jones (Ed.). Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Lincoln, Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press, 1962.Google Scholar
  17. Fisher, S., & Cleveland, S. E. Body Images and Personality. Princeton, N.J.: Van Nostrand, 1958.Google Scholar
  18. Gardner, R. W., Holzman, P. S., Klein, G. S., Linton, H. B., & Spence, D. P. Cognitive control: a study of individual consistencies in cognitive behavior. Psychol Iss., 1959, 1, No. 4.Google Scholar
  19. Goldberger, L., & Holt, R. R. A comparison of isolation effects and their personality correlates in two divergent samples. WADD Technical Report, Wright Air De- velopment Division, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, March 1961.Google Scholar
  20. Handel, G. A study of family and personality. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago, 1962.Google Scholar
  21. Holt, R. R., & Goldberger, L. Research on the effects of isolation on cognitive functioning. WADD Technical Report 60-260, Wright Air Development Division, Wright- Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, March 1960.Google Scholar
  22. Holt, R. R., & Havel, J. Primary-secondary process scoring. In M. R. Rickers-Ovsiankina (Ed.). Rorschach Psychology. New York: Wiley, 1960.Google Scholar
  23. Holtzman, W., Thorpe, J. S., Swartz, J. D., & Herron, W. Inkblot Perception and Personality. Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press, 1961.Google Scholar
  24. Kagan, J. Acquisition and significance of sex-typing and sex role identity. In M. L. Hoffman & L. W. Hoffman (Eds.). Review of Child Development Research. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1964.Google Scholar
  25. King, G. F. An interpersonal conception of Rorschach human movement and delusional content. J. proj. Tech., 1960, 24, 161–163.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Klein, G. S., Gardner, R. W., & Schlesinger, H. J. Tolerance for unrealistic experiences: a generality study. Brit. J. Psychol, 1962, 53, 41–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lane, R., & Singer, J.L. Familial attitudes of paranoid schizophrenics and normals from two socioeconomic classes. J. abn. soc. Psychol., 1959, 58, 328–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lerner, B. Rorschach movement and dreams. J. abn. Psychol., 1966, 71, 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Levine, M., & Spivack, G. Rorschach Index of Repressive Style. Springfield, 111.: Charles C Thomas, 1965.Google Scholar
  30. Loveland, N. T., & Singer, M. T. Projective test assessment of the effects of sleep deprivation. J. prof. Tech., 1959, 23, 323–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Meltzoff, J., Singer, J. L., & Korchin, S. J. Motor inhibition and Rorschach movement responses: a test of sensory-tonic theory. J. Pers., 1953, 21, 400–410.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Monroe, L. J., Rechtschaffen, A., Foulkes, D., & Jensen, J. Discriminability of REM and NREM reports. J. pers. soc. Psychol, 1965, 2, 456–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Murray, H. A. Techniques for a systematic investigation of fantasy. J. Psychol, 1937, 3, 115–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Page, H. A. Studies in fantasy-daydreaming frequency and Rorschach scoring categories. J. consult. Psychol, 1957, 21, 111–114.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Palmer, J. O. Rorschach’s experience-balance: the concept, general population characteristics, and intellectual correlates. J. prof. Tech., 1955, 19, 138–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Palmer, J. O. Attitudinal correlates of Rorschach’s experience-balance. J. prof. Tech., 1956, 20, 208–211.Google Scholar
  37. Palmer, J. O. Alterations in Rorschach’s experience-balance under conditions of food and sleep deprivation. J. prof. Tech., 1963, 27, 208–213.Google Scholar
  38. Pytkowicz, A. R. An experimental study of the reduction of hostility through phantasy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington, 1963.Google Scholar
  39. Rapaport, D. Organization and Pathology of Thought. New York: Columbia University Press, 1951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Roe, A. The Making of a Scientist. New York: Dodd, Mead, 1952.Google Scholar
  41. Rorschach, H. Psychodiagnostics. Berne: Hans Huber, 1942.Google Scholar
  42. Schechter, N., Schmeidler, G., & Staal, M. Dream reports and creative tendencies in students of the arts, sciences and engineering. J. consult. Psychol, 1965, 29, 415–421.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schonbar, R. Differential dream recall frequency as a component of “life style.” J. consult. Psychol, 1965, 29, 468–474.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sharef, M. R. An approach to the theory and measurement of introception. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, 1959.Google Scholar
  45. Shatin, L. Rorschach adjustment and the Thematic Apperception Test. J. prof. Tech., 1953, 17, 92–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Siipola, Elsa, & Taylor, Vivian. Reactions to ink blots under free and pressure conditions. J. Pers., 1952, 21, 22–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Singer, D. G. Interracial attitudes of Negro and white fifth grade children in segregated and unsegregated schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Teachers College, Columbia University, 1966.Google Scholar
  48. Singer, J. L. The Behn-Rorschach inkblots: a preliminary comparison with the original Rorschach series. J. proj. Tech., 1952, 16, 238–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Singer, J. L. Projected familial attitudes as a function of socioeconomic status and psychopathology. J. consult. Psychol, 1954, 18, 325–331.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Singer, J. L. Delayed gratification and ego-development: implications for clinical and experimental research. J. consult. Psychol., 1955, 19, 259–266.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Singer, J. L. The experience-type: some behavioral correlates and theoretical implications. In M. R. Rickers-Ovsiankina (Ed.). Rorschach Psychology. New York: Wiley, 1960.Google Scholar
  52. Singer, J. L. Imagination and waiting ability in young children. J. Pers., 1961, 29, 396–413.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Singer, J. L. Daydreaming. New York: Random House, 1965.Google Scholar
  54. Singer, J. L., & Antrobus, J. S. A factor-analytic study of daydreaming and conceptually-related cognitive and personality variables. Percept, mot. Skills. Monograph Supplement 3-17, 1963.Google Scholar
  55. Singer, J. L., & McCraven, V. Some characteristics of adult daydreaming. J. Psychol., 1961, 51, 151–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Singer, J. L., & McCraven, V. Patterns of daydreaming in American subcultural groups. Internat. J. soc. Psychiat., 1962, 8, 272–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Singer, J. L., Meltzoff, J., & Goldman, G. D. Rorschach movement responses following motor inhibition and hyperactivity. J. consult. Psychol., 1952, 16, 359–364.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Singer, J. L., & Opler, M. K. Contrasting patterns of fantasy and motility in Irish and Italian schizophrenics. J. abn. soc. Psychol., 1956, 53, 42–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Singer, J. L., & Schonbar, R. Correlates of daydreaming: a dimension of self-awareness. J. consult. Psychol, 1961, 25, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Singer, J. L., & Streiner, B. Imaginative content in the dreams and fantasy play of blind and sighted children. Percept, mot. Skills, 1966, 22, 475–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Singer, J. L., & Sugarman, D. Some Thematic Apperception Test correlates of Rorschach human movement responses. J. consult. Psychol, 1955, 19, 117–119.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Singer, J. L., Wilensky, H., & McCraven, V. Delaying capacity, fantasy, and planning ability: a factorial study of some basic ego functions. J. consult. Psychol, 1956, 20, 375–383.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Spivack, G., & Levine, M. Self-regulation and acting-out in normal adolescents. Progress Report for National Institutes of Mental Health, Grant M-4531. Devon, Penn.: Devereux Foundation, 1964.Google Scholar
  64. Stanton, H., Back, K., & Litwak, E. Role playing in survey research. Amer. J. Soc, 1956, 62, 172–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Stein, K. B., & Craik, K. H. Relationship between motoric and ideational activity preference and time perspective in neurotics and schizophrenics. J. consult. Psychol, 1965, 26, 460–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Strodtbeck, F. L. The family as a three-person group. Amer. Soc. Rev., 1954, 19, 23–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sundberg, N. D. The practice of psychological testing in clinical services in the United States. Amer. Psychol, 1961, 16, 79–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Teltscher, H. O. A study of the relationship between the perception of movement on the Rorschach and motoric expression. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Yeshiva University, 1964.Google Scholar
  69. Tomkins, S. S. Left and right: a basic dimension of ideology and personality. In R. W. White (Ed.). The Study of Lives. New York: Atherton Press, 1963.Google Scholar
  70. Werner, H. Motion and motion perception: a study on vicarious perception. J. Psychol., 1945, 19, 317–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Werner, H., & Wapner, S. Toward a general theory of perception. Psychol. Rev., 1952, 59, 324–333.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zubin, J., Eron, D., & Schumer, F. An Experimental Approach to Projective Techniques. New York: Wiley, 1965.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1968

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jerome L. Singer

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations