Computer Aided Methods for the Synthesis of Mechanism Kinematic Models: Planar and Spatial Cases

  • P. Fanghella
  • C. Galletti
Conference paper


In the past few years, many works on computer-aided mechanism analysis and synthesis have appeared in the scientific literature. This is a complex and difficult subject which requires specific expertise, ranging from a good knowledge of mechanical hardware and the use of modeling techniques and computer programs. When the term ‘mechanism model ‘ is used, some ambiguity may arise. Model is, in fact, a word with different meanings depending on the context and environment in which it is used. For the purpose of mechanism analysis, we shall follow classical definitions (Cannon) of ‘physical model’ and ‘mathematical model’; moreover, we shall regard a ‘functional mathematical model’ as a set of differential and/or transcendental equations which give the position, velocity, acceleration, reactions, and internal forces of any mechanism part. In most applications, very simple physical models can be used for mechanism design: a model based on rigid links and kinematic pairs can often be accepted, and and we shall adopt it in this paper.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Angeles J. (1982) Spatial kinematic chains. Springer-Verlag.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Cannon R. (1967) Dynamics of physical systems. McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
  3. Fanghella P. (1984) Sull’analisi di compatibilità dei meccanismi in moto rigido generale. VII Congr. AIMETA. Trieste.Google Scholar
  4. Galletti C. (1982) Osservazioni sui gruppi di Assur nei meccanismi piani. VI Congresso AIMETA. Genova.Google Scholar
  5. Galletti C. Giannotti E. (1984) A personal computer approach to Computer-aided mechanism design. IASTED Conference CAD.Google Scholar
  6. Galletti C. Giannotti E. (1985) CAD of mechanical components: a conceptual point of view. III IASTED Symp. Appl.Informatics.Google Scholar
  7. Gupta V.K. (1973) Kinematic analysis of plane and spatial mechanism. Trans. ASME J.Eng.Ind.,95,481–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hervé J. (1978) Analyse structurelle des mécanismes par groupe des déplacements. Mech.mach.theory, 13,437–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Litvin F. (1975) Simplification of the matrix method of linkage analysis by division of a mechanism into unclosed kinematic chains. Mech.mach.theory, 10,315–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Paul B. (1979) Kinematics and dynamics of planar machinery. Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  11. Parnass D. (1979) Designing software for ease of extension and contraction. IEEE Trans.Soft.Eng., SE-5, 128–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pedemonte D. (1983) Analisi automatica dei meccanismi piani: metodi diretti e indiretti di scomposizione. Tesi. Genova.Google Scholar
  13. Rossi A. Fanghella P. Giannotti E. (1981) An interactive computer package for planar mechanism analysis. II Conference Engineering software, London.Google Scholar
  14. Russo G. (1984) Analisi di posizione dei meccanismi spaziali: applicazioni all’analisi dei manipolatori. Tesi. Genova.Google Scholar
  15. Sheth P. Uicker J. (1972) IMP: Integrated mechanism program. Trans. ASME J.Eng.Ind., 94, 454–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Smith D. Chace M. Rubens A. (1972) The automatic generation of a mathematical model for machinery systems. ASME paper 72mech3lGoogle Scholar
  17. Suh C. Radcliffe C. (1978) Kinematics and mechanisms design. Wiley & sons.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Fanghella
    • 1
  • C. Galletti
    • 1
  1. 1.Istituto di Meccanica applicataUniversity of GenoaItaly

Personalised recommendations