Advertisement

Random Signals Analyses Applied to Vehicle-Track Interaction

  • C. Esveld
Conference paper

Abstract

The inter-relations between vehicle and track can be described in terms of transfer functions, indicating how the various geometry components contribute to a given response component of the vehicle. In conventional approaches use is made of mathematical models, based on a schematisation according to masses, springs and dampers. As a rule, the predictive merits of such models turn out to be small, due to the impossibility of accurately determining the model parameters.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Esveld, C: “Comparison between Theoretical and Actual Transfer Function of Track Maintenance Machines”, Doctoral Thesis 1978.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Esveld, C: “Spectral Analysis of Track Geometry for Assessing the Performance of Maintenace Machines”, ORE DT 77, 1978.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Esveld, C:“A Numerical Butterworth Filter for Digital Data Processing with Applications to the Analysis of Track Geometry”, Rail International, Vol 11, No 1, p.35, 1980.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    ORE C 152, Rp 1: “Introductory study to the problem of assessing track geometry on the basis of vehicle response”, 1981.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    ORE C 152, Rp 2: “Preliminary study concerning the application of the mathematical methods for characterising the vehicle/ track interaction”, 1983.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Esveld, C. Kosieradzki, W. and Peerboom, A: “Theory and Application of the Multiple Input Single Output method”. ORE DT 136, 1982.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Bendat, J.S. and Piersol A.G.: “Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedures”, Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1971.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Bendat, J.S. and Piersol, A.G.: “Engineering Applications of Correlation and Spectral Analysis”, Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1980.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Bendat, J.S.: “Statistical Errors in Measurement of Coherence Functions and Input/Output Quantities”, Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol.59, No 3, p. 405, 1978.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Halvorson, W.G. and Bendat, J.S.: “ Noise Source Identifaction Using Coherent Output Power Spectra”, Sound and Vibrating, Vol. 9, No 8, p.15, 1975.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Esveld, C.:“NS adopts contact-free measurement of track geometry”, Railway Gazette, November 1983.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Peerboom, A., e.a.: “A method to measure wheel-rail forces” (in Dutch). NS-report CTO/6/10.235/41, April 1981.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Proceedings “International conference on wheel/rail load en displacement measurement techniques”, September 1983.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Esveld
    • 1
  1. 1.Netherlands RailwaysThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations