Advertisement

Solid Modelling: A Teenaged Art — When Will It Mature?

  • M. J. Pratt
Conference paper

Abstract

The history of solid modelling now spans some fifteen years. Although progress was initially rapid, more recently the pace of development seems to have slowed except in the area of graphical rendering, where advances have been driven by the increasing availability of sophisticated graphics hardware. In fact the last five years has been a time of consolidation, as may be seen by a study of two state-of-the-art seminars (Carter [1979] Faux [l983) in which the capabilities of a range of solid modelling systems were examined. In the interval between these events few major changes have occurred in solid modelling. There are certainly more systems in evidence, but most of them are based on techniques which have been known for some time. Systems are, in general, more robust. A wider range of engineering applications is available, but we have not yet come close to realising the ultimate potential, which was recognised by the earliest workers in this area, for the true integration of engineering design and manufacture based on the use of a solid model as the product definition.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson C (1983) The New BUILD User Guide. CAE Group Document No. 116, Computer Aided Engineering Group, Cambridge University Engineering Dept., July 1983.Google Scholar
  2. ANSI (1982) Digital Representation for Communication of Product Definition Data. ANSI Y14.26M, American National Standard, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Brown CM (1982) PADL-2: A Technical Summary. IEEE Computer Graphics & Applications, March 1982, 69–84.Google Scholar
  4. Brun JM et al. (1983) The Use of EUCLID in the CAM-I Test. In Faux |1983|, 203–238.Google Scholar
  5. CAM-I (1981) CAM-I Geometric Modelling Project Boundary File Design (XBF-2). Report No. R-81-GM-02.1, CAM-I Inc., Arlington, Texas.Google Scholar
  6. CAM-I (1980) An Interface between Geometric Modellers and Applications Programs (3 vols). Report No. R-80-GM-04, CAM-I Inc., Arlington, Texas.Google Scholar
  7. Carey CG, de Pennington A (1983) A Study of the Interface between CAD and CAM using Geometric Modelling Techniques. Proc. 3rd Anglo-Hungarian Seminar on Computer Aided Geometric Design, Cambridge, September, 1983, published by Cambridge University Engineering Dept.Google Scholar
  8. Carter WA, ed. (1979) Proc. Geometric Modelling Seminar, Bournemouth, November 1979. Document No. P-80-GM-Ol, CAM-I Inc., Arlington, Texas.Google Scholar
  9. Chan BTF (1982) ROMAPT: A New Link between CAD and CAM. Computer Aided Design 14, 261–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dassler R et al. (1982) Databases for Geometric Modelling and their Applications. In Filestructures and Databases for CAD, eds. J. Encarnacao & FL Krause, North-Holland Publ. Co.Google Scholar
  11. Eastman CM (1981) Database Facilities for Engineering Design. Proc. IEEE 69,10, 1249–1263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Faux ID, ed. (1983) Proc. 2nd CAM-I Geometric Modelling Seminar, Cambridge, December 1983. Document No. P-83-GM-01 (2 vols.), CAM-I Inc., Arlington, Texas.Google Scholar
  13. Faux ID, Pratt MJ (1979) Computational Geometry for Design and Manufacture, Ellis Horwood, Chichester.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Jared GEM, Varady T (1984) Synthesis of Volume Modelling and Sculptured Surfaces in BUILD. Proc. CAD 84 Conf., Brighton, April 1984, IPC Science and Technology Press.Google Scholar
  15. Lee YC & Fu KS (1983) A CSG-based DBMS for CAD/CAM and its supporting Query Language. Proc. Database Week, San Jose, May 23–26, 1983, Computer Society Press.Google Scholar
  16. Parkinson A (1983) Feature Recognition and Parts Classification in BUILD. CAD Group Document No. 112, Cambridge University Engineering Laboratory.Google Scholar
  17. Parkinson A (1984) An Automatic NC Data Generation Facility for the BUILD Solid Modelling System. Proc. 16th CIRP International Seminar on Manufacturing Systems, Tokyo, 1984.Google Scholar
  18. Pratt MJ (1984) Eurographics 1984 Tutorial Notes, Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  19. Pratt MJ, Geisow AD (1985) Surface/Surface Intersection Problems. Proc. IMA Conf. on Mathematics of Surfaces, Manchester, Sept. 17–19, 1984, ed. JA Gregory, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Pratt MJ, Wilson PR (1984) IGES-based Transmission of Solid Modelling Data. Proc. MICAD 84 Conf., Paris Feb/March 1984, Hermes Publishing, Paris.Google Scholar
  21. Requicha AAG, Voelcker HB (1982) Solid Modeling — A Historical Summary and Contemporary Assessment. IEEE Computer Graphics & Applications, March 1982, 9–24.Google Scholar
  22. Rossignac JR, Requicha AAG (1984) Constant-Radius Blending in Solid Modeling. Computers in Mechanical Engineering, July 1984, 65–73.Google Scholar
  23. Shape Data Ltd. (1983) Modeller Test — ROMULUS. In Faux |1983|, 324–367.Google Scholar
  24. Shape Data Ltd. (1984) ROMULUS Kernel Interface Reference Manual, Release 1.0, November 1984.Google Scholar
  25. Shiroma Y, Okino N & Kakazu Y (1982) Research on 3D Geometric Modelling by Sweep Primitives. Proc. CAD 82 Conf., Brighton, March 30 – April 1, 1982, Butterworths.Google Scholar
  26. Spur G et al. (1978) CAPSY — A Dialogue for Computer Aided Manufacturing Process Planning. Proc. 19th MTDR Conference, Manchester.Google Scholar
  27. Staley SM, Henderson MR & Anderson DC (1983) Using Syntactic Pattern Recognition to Extract Feature Information from a Solid Geometric Database, Computers in Mechanical Engineering, Sept. 1983, 61–66.Google Scholar
  28. Tiller W (1983) Rational B-Splines for Curve and Surface Representation. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, Sept. 1983, 61–69.Google Scholar
  29. TIPS Working Group (1978) TIPS-1 Technical Information Processing System. Institute of Precision Engineering, Hokkaido University, Japan.Google Scholar
  30. US Air Force, Department of (1984) Product Definition Data Interface (5 vols.). Obtainable from Computer Aided Manufacturing International, Inc., Arlington, Texas, as documents DR-84-GM-01 to 05.Google Scholar
  31. Varady T, Pratt MJ (1985) Design Techniques for the Definition of Solid Objects with free-form Surfaces. To appear, Computer Aided Geometric Design.Google Scholar
  32. Voelcker HB et al (1978). The PADL-1.0/2 System for Defining and Displaying Solid Objects. Computer Graphics 12, 3 (Proc. SIGGRAPH 1978), 257–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Van Wijk JJ (1984) Ray Tracing Objects defined by Sweeping a Sphere. Proc. Eurographics 84.Google Scholar
  34. Yamaguchi K et al (1984) Computer Integrated Manufacturing of Surfaces using Octree Encoding. IEEE Computer Graphics & Applications, January 1984, 60–65.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. J. Pratt
    • 1
  1. 1.Cranfield Institute of TechnologyUK

Personalised recommendations