Advertisement

Indices for Characterizing Ordinal Data

  • Ulrich Tüshaus
Conference paper

Abstract

In a well-known approach for the analysis of qualitative data, the information on the objects contained in each (qualitative) variable is represented by a corresponding binary relation on the set of objects. The aim is then to find, for example, a single relation—a median relation—approximating best the input data. Barthelemy and Monjardet (1980/81, 1987) give an excellent overview of the underlying concept, suitable objective functions and solution methods.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [Barthélemy and Monjardet, 1980/81]
    Barthélemy, J. P. and Monjardet, B. (1980/81). The median procedure in cluster analysis and social choice theory. Mathematical Social Sciences, 1(3):235–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [Barthélemy and Monjardet, 1987]
    Barthélemy, J. P. and Monjardet, B. (1987). The median procedure in data analysis: New results and open problems. In [Bock, 1987], pages 309-316.Google Scholar
  3. [Bock, 1987]
    Bock, H. H., editor (1987). Classification and Related Methods of Data Analysis, Proceedings of the First Conference of the International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), Technical University of Aachen, F.R.G. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1988.Google Scholar
  4. [Day, 1987]
    Day, W. H. E. (1987). Consensus methods as tools for data analysis. In [Bock, 1987] pages 317–324.Google Scholar
  5. [Day and McMorris, 1985]
    Day, W. H. E. and McMorris, F. R. (1985). A formalization of consensus index methods. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 47(2):215–229.Google Scholar
  6. [Marcotorchino, 1981]
    Marcotorchino, F. (1981). Agrégation des similarités en classification automatique. Thèse de Doctorat d’Etat ès Sciences Mathématiques, Universitè Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris VI.Google Scholar
  7. [Monjardet, 1985]
    Monjardet, B. (1985). Concordance et consensus d’ordres totaux: les coefficients K et W. Revue de Statistique Appliquée, 33(2):55–85.Google Scholar
  8. [Schader and Tüshaus, 1986]
    Schader, M. and Tüshaus, U. (1986). Subgradient methods for analyzing qualitative data. In Gaul, W. and Schader, M., editors, Classification as a Tool of Research, Karlsruhe, pages 397–403. North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ulrich Tüshaus
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für UnternehmensforschungHochschule St. GallenSt. GallenSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations