Advertisement

Optimized Maintenance and Management of Ageing of Critical Equipment in Nuclear Power Plants

  • H. M. Hashemian
Chapter
Part of the Power Systems book series (POWSYS)

Abstract

New power generation economics and politics in the 2000 decade, recent interest in nuclear power plant life extension, and challenges from other electricity production systems such as combined cycle gas plants are providing new opportunities and new challenges to the nuclear power industry. Chief among these is the challenge to continue to improve efficiency, reduce costs, and manage the aging of critical components. This paper presents a review of testing and maintenance technologies that have great potential to help the nuclear industry in meeting these challenges. These technologies range from new methods for on-line calibration and testing of process instrumentation to predictive maintenance of the reactor vessel and its internals.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hashemian, H.M., “On-Line Testing of Calibration of Process Instrumentation Channels in Nuclear Power Plants,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, NUREG/CR6343, (November 1995).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hashemian, H.M., “Long Term Performance and Ageing Characteristics of Nuclear Plant Pressure Transmitters.” US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, NUREG/CR-5851, March 1993.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hashemian, H.M., etal., “Effects of Ageing on Response Time of Nuclear Plant Pressure Sensors.” US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, NUREG/CR-5383, June 1989.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hashemian, H M, etal., “Ageing of Nuclear Plant Resistance Temperature Detectors.” US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Report Number NUREG/CR-5560, June 1990.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hashemian, H.M., and K.M. Petersen, “Loop Current Step Response Method for In-Place Measurement of Response Time of Installed RTDs and Thermocouples,” (American Institute of Physics) Seventh International Symposium on Temperature, 6:1151–1156, Toronto, Canada, May 1992.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hashemian, H.M., “New Technology for Remote Testing of Response Time of Installed Thermocouples,” United States Air Force, Arnold Engineering Development Center, Report Number AEDC-TR-91–26, Volume 1 - Background and General Details, January 1992.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hashemian, H.M., C.S. Shell, and C.N. Jones, “New Instrumentation Technologies for Testing the Bonding of Sensors to Solid Materials,” National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Marshall Space Flight Center, NASA/CR-4744, May 1996.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hashemian, H.M., and K.M. Petersen, “Measurement of Performance of Installed Thermocouples,” Proceedings of the Aerospace Industries and Test Measurement Divisions of the Instrument Society of America, 37th International Instrumentation Symposium, pp. 913–926, USA Paper #91–113, San Diego, California, May 1991.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    DOE/EPRI Report, “Ageing Management Guideline for Commercial Nuclear Power Plants — Electrical Cables and Terminations,” SAND96–0344, September 1996.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hashemian, H.M., etal., “Advanced Instrumentation and Maintenance Technologies for Nuclear Power Plants,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, NUREG/CR-5501, (August 1998).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. M. Hashemian
    • 1
  1. 1.Analysis and Measurement Services CorporationKnoxvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations