PEANO and On-Line Monitoring Techniques for Calibration Reduction of Process Instrumentation in Power Plants

  • Paolo F. Fantoni
Part of the Power Systems book series (POWSYS)


On-line monitoring evaluates instrument channel performance by assessing its consistency with other plant indications. Industry and EPRI [1] experience in the USA at several plants has shown this overall approach to be very effective in identifying instrument channels that are exhibiting degrading or inconsistent performance characteristics.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    EPRI (2000), On-Line Monitoring of Instrument Channel Performance, TR104965–R1 NRC SER.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fantoni P, Mazzola A (1994) Applications of Autoassociative Neural Networks for Signal Validation in Accident Management. In: Proceedings of the IAEA Specialist Meeting on Advanced Information Methods and Artificial Intelligence in Nuclear Power Plant Control Rooms, Halden, Norway.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fantoni p, Mazzola A (1995) Transient and Steady State Signal Validation in Nuclear Power Plants using Autoassociative Neural Networks and Pattern Recognition. In: Proceedings of SMORN V II, Avignon, France.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fantoni P, Mazzola A (1996) A Pattern Recognition-Artificial Neural Networks Based Model for Signal Validation in Nuclear Power Plants. In: Annals of Nuclear Energy, Vol. 23, No.13, pp 1069–1076. 376 FantoniGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fantoni P, Mazzola A (1996) Multiple Failure Signal Validation in Nuclear Power Plants using Artificial Neural Networks. In: Nuclear Technology, Vol. 113, No. 3, pp 368–374.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fantoni P (1996) Neuro-Fuzzy Models Applied to Full Range Signal Validation in NPP. In: Proceedings of NPIC123HMIT’96, The Pennsylvania State Univ., PA.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fantoni P, Figedy S, Racz A (1998) PEANO, A Toolbox for Real-Time Process Signal Validation and Estimation. HWR-515, OECD Halden Reactor Project (restricted).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fantoni P, Renders J (1998) On-Line Performance Estimation and Condition Monitoring using Neuro-Fuzzy Techniques. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on On-Line Fault Detection and Supervision in the Chemical Process Industries, Lyon, France.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fantoni P (2000) A Neuro-Fuzzy Model Applied to Full Range Signal Validation of PWR Nuclear Power Plant Data. In: International Journal of General Systems, Vol. 29 (2), pp 305–320.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tou JT, Gonzalez R C (1974) Pattern Recognition Principles. Addison Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bezdek JC (1981) Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Function Algorithms Plenum Press, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gustafson DE, Kessel W C (1979) Fuzzy Clustering with a Fuzzy Covariance Matrix. In: Proceedings of IEEE CDC, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Krishnapuram R, Keller J (1993) A Possibilistic Approach to Clustering. In: IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp 98–100.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bartal Y, Lin J, Uhrig RE (1995) Nuclear Power Plant Transient Diagnostics Using an Artificial Neural Networks that Allow “Don’t-Know” Classifications. In: Nuclear Technology, Vol. 110.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fantoni P, Mazzola A (1996) Accuracy Estimate of Artificial Neural Networks Based Models for Industrial Applications. In: Artificial Intelligence in the Petroleum Industry. Symbolic and Computational Applications 2, Chapter 17, B Braunschweig 123 B Bremdal Editions.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paolo F. Fantoni
    • 1
  1. 1.Institutt for energiteknikkOECD Halden Reactor ProjectHaldenNorway

Personalised recommendations