Planning Surveillance Test Policies Through Genetic Algorithms

  • Celso M. F. Lapa
  • Cláudio M. N. A. Pereira
  • P. F. Frutuoso e Melo
Part of the Power Systems book series (POWSYS)


Nuclear power plant systems are comprised of both online and cold-standby components. Cold-standby components differ from the online ones, as they may be unavailable due to unrevealed failures. The usual procedure employed to reveal failures is to submit the components to surveillance tests. The surveillance tests policy may deal with two conflicting scenarios: the test frequency must be sufficiently high in order to minimize the occurrence of failures but, on the other hand, it must be low enough due to its influence on the component unavailability. Obtaining an optimum surveillance test policy at the system level, which involves consideration of many interdependent components, is a very difficult optimization problem. Hence, in this work we propose the use of genetic algorithms for searching the optimum surveillance tests policy, due to its robustness and efficiency in complex problem solving. Here, the probabilistic model considers: a) wear-out effects on cold-standby components when they undergo surveillance tests; b) that when a failure is revealed during a surveillance test, corrective maintenance is performed and, c) that components are distinct (that is, each has distinct test parameters, such as: outage time, wear-out factors, etc.); d) that tests are not necessarily periodic.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. BILLINTON R, PAN J (1998) Optimal Maintenance Scheduling in a Two Identical Component Parallel Redundant System, Reliability Engineering System Safety, v.59, pp. 309316.Google Scholar
  2. CHIANG JH, YANG J (2001) Optimal Maintenance Policy for a Markovian System under Periodic Inspection. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, v. 71, pp. 165–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. DIJKHUIZEN G, HEIJDEN M (1999) Preventive Maintenance and the Interval Availability Distribution of an Unreliable Production System, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, v. 66, pp. 13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. DUTHIE JC, ROBER TSON MI, CLAYTON AM, Lidbury DPG (1998) Risk-based Approaches to Ageing and Maintenance Management, Nuclear Engineering and Design, v. 184, pp. 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. GOLDBERG DE (1989) Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning, New York, Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  6. HAMSEN E (1992) Global Optimization Using Interval Analysis, New York, Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
  7. HARUNUZZAMAN M, ALDEMIR T (1996) Optimization of Standby Safety System Maintenance Scheduling in Nuclear Power Plants, Nuclear Technology, v. 113, pp. 354–367.Google Scholar
  8. HILSMEIER TA., ALDEMIR T, VESELY WE (1995) Time-dependent Unavailability of Aging Standby Components Based on Nuclear Plant Data, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, v. 47, pp. 199–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. HOLLAND JH (1975) Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  10. LAPA CMF, PEREIRA CMNA, MOL ACA (1999) Application of Genetic Algorithms to the Optimization of Reliability-Centered Preventive Maintenance Politices of Nuclear Systems (in Portuguese), Proceedings of the 15th Brazilian Congress of Mechanical Engineering, Associaçâo Brasileira de Ciências Mecânicas, Rio de Janeiro, RJ.Google Scholar
  11. LAPA CMF, PEREIRA CMNA, MOL ACA (2000a) Maximization of a Nuclear System Availability through Maintenance Scheduling Optimization Using Genetic Algorithm, Nuclear Engineering Design, v. 196, pp. 95–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. LAPA, CMF, PEREIRA,CMNA, FRUTUOSO PFM (2000b) Coupled Emergency Diesel Generators-Component Coolant Water System Maintenance Scheduling Optimization Using Genetic Algorithms“, Proceedings of the Fourth FUNS (Fuzzy Logic and Intelligent Techniques in Nuclear Science) Conference on Intelligent Techniques and Soft Computing in Nuclear Science and Engineering, pp. 519–526, Bruges, Belgium.Google Scholar
  13. LEWIS EE. (1996) Introduction to Reliability Engineering, New York, John Wiley Sons.Google Scholar
  14. LEVITIN G, LISNIANSKI A (1999) Joint Redundancy and Maintenance Optimization for Multistate Series-parallel Systems, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, v. 64, pp. 3342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. MARTORELL S, MUNOZ A, SERRADELL V (1996) Age-Dependent Models for Evaluating Risks Cost of Surveillance Maintenance of Components, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, v. 45, n. 3, pp. 433–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. MUNOZ A, MARTORELL S, SERRADELL V (1997) Genetic Algorithms in Optimizing Surveillance and Maintenance of Components, Reliability Engineering System Safety, v. 57, n. 2, pp. 107–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. NEMHAUSER GL, WOLSEY LA (1988) Integer and Combinatorial Optimization, New York, John Wiley and Sons.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. NUNES MEC, PEREIRA CMNA, FRUTUOSO E MELOPF (2000) Optimization of the Device of Stages Through Genetic Algorithms for Non-Markovian Systems Reliability Evaluation: an Application to Nuclear Safety Systems, Proceedings of the Fourth FLINS (Fuzzy Logic and Intelligent Techniques in Nuclear Science) Conference on Intelligent Techniques and Soft Computing in Nuclear Science and Engineering, pp. 527–534, Bruges, Belgium.Google Scholar
  19. PARK DH, JUNG GM, YUM JK (2000) Cost Minimization for Periodic Maintenance Policy of a System Subject to Slow Degradation, Reliability Engineering System Safety, v. 68, pp. 105–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. PEREIRA CMNA, LAPA CMF (2000) Evolutionary Computation at the Institute of Nu- clear Engineering (in Portuguese), Proceedings of the X II National Meeting on Reactor Physics and Thermo-hydraulics, Associaçâo Brasileira de Energia Nuclear, Rio de Janeiro, RJ.Google Scholar
  21. VAN NOORTWIJK J, DEKKER R, MAZZUCHI T (1992) Expert Judgment in Maintenance Optimization, IEEE Trans. Reliability, v. 41, pp. 427–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. VAURIO JK (1997) On Time-dependent Availability and Maintenance Optimization of Standby Units under Various Maintenance Policies. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, v. 56, pp. 79–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Celso M. F. Lapa
    • 1
    • 3
  • Cláudio M. N. A. Pereira
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • P. F. Frutuoso e Melo
    • 2
  1. 1.Comissão Nacional da Engenharia NuclearIENRio de JaneiroBrasil
  2. 2.COPPE/UFRJ — Prog. Eng. NuclearRio de JaneiroBrasil
  3. 3.FACET — Mathematical and Computer Science DepartmentUniversidade IguaçuNova IguaçuBrazil

Personalised recommendations