Advertisement

Simulating the Social Context of Human Choice

  • Matthew J. Rockloff
  • Bibb Latané
Conference paper

Abstract

An astronomer can predict with pinpoint accuracy the movement of far-off stars through the nighttime sky. Every point of light slides in its inevitable arc across the lens of her telescope in accordance with paths which can be plotted centuries in advance with a relatively simple set of formulae. Ironically, the same astronomer might have considerable difficulty in predicting what she will wear the following day, much less her own mood. Even viewed close-up, the twisted trajectories of action and emotion traveled by human beings are far more difficult to follow than the motions of the heavens.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bourgeois, M.J., and Latané, B. (in press) Testing dynamic social impact theory: The creative interplay between simulation and reality. In: Chattoe, E., and Conte, R. eds. Evolving societies: The computer simulation of social systems. UCL Press, London.Google Scholar
  2. Garner, W.R. (1974) The Processing of Information and Structure. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale N.J.Google Scholar
  3. Hammond, K.R., and Householder, J.E. (1962) Introduction to the Statistical Method. Alfred A. Knopf, New York, pp. 136–142.Google Scholar
  4. Harton, H.C., Green, L.R., Jackson, C., and Latané, B. (1996) Discussion leads to consolidation, clustering, and correlation — and (sometimes) the correct answer: A classroom demonstration of dynamic social impact. Unpublished Manuscript.Google Scholar
  5. Jackson, C., and Latané, B. (1995, July) Dynamic social impact on trial: The emergence of subgroups in electronic juries (poster). In: American Psychological Society. New York.Google Scholar
  6. Kauffman, S.A. (1993) The Origins of Order: Self Organization in Evolution. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Kelso, J.A.S. (1995) Dynamic Patterns: the Self Organization of Brain and Behavior. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  8. Latané, B. (1981) The psychology of social impact. In: American Psychologist. 36, pp. 343–365.Google Scholar
  9. Latané, B. (1996a) Dynamic social impact: The creation of culture by communication. In: Journal of Communication.Google Scholar
  10. Latané, B. (1996b) Strength from weakness: The fate of opinion minorities in spatially distributed groups. In: Witte, E., and Davis, J. eds. Understanding group behavior: Consensual action by small groups. LEA, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  11. Latané, B. (in press a) The emergence of clustering and correlation from social interaction. In: Hegselmann, R. and Peitgen, H.O. eds. Order and chaos in nature and society. HölderPichler, Vienna.Google Scholar
  12. Latané, B. (in press b) Dynamic social impact: Robust predictions from simple theory. In: Hegselmann, R., Mueller, U., and Troitzsch, K.G. eds. Modeling and simulation in the social sciences from the philosophy of science point of view. Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  13. Latané, B., and Bourgeois, M.J. (1996) Dynamic social impact in electronic groups: Consolidation and clustering in computer-mediated communication. In: Journal of Communication. Latané, B., and L’Herrou, T. (in press) Social clustering in the Conformity Game: Dynamic social impact in electronic groups. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.Google Scholar
  14. Latané, B., and Nowak, A. (1996) Self-organizing social systems: Necessary and sufficient conditions for the emergence of consolidation and clustering. In: Barnett, G. and Boster, F. eds. Progress in communication sciences: Persuasion. Ablex, Norwood, NJ.Google Scholar
  15. Latané, B., Nowak, A., and Liu, J. (1994) Measuring emergent social phenomena: Dynamism, polarization, and clustering as order parameters in dynamic social systems. In: Behavioral Science. 39, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
  16. Lewenstein, M., Nowak, A., and Latané, B. (1992) The statistical mechanics of social impact. In: Physical Review A. 45, pp. 703–716.Google Scholar
  17. Mueller, J.H., and Schuessler, K.F. (1961) Statistical Reasoning in Sociology. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, pp. 177–179.Google Scholar
  18. Nowak, A., and Latané, B. (1994) Simulating the emergence of social order from individual behavior. In: Gilbert, N., and Doran, J. eds. Simulating societies: The computer simulation of social phenomena. University College London Press, London, pp. 63–84.Google Scholar
  19. Nowak, A., Szamrej, J., and Latané, B. (1990) From private attitude to public opinion: A dynamic theory of social impact. In. Psychological Review. 97, pp. 362–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Spoehr, K.T., and Lehmkuhle, S.W. (1982) Visual Information Processing. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  21. Waldrop, M.M. (1992) Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos. Simon and Schullster, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Wilkinson, L. (1982) An experimental evaluation of multivariate graphical point representation. In: Human Factors in Computer Science: Proceedings. Maryland, Gaithersburg, pp. 202–209.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthew J. Rockloff
    • 1
  • Bibb Latané
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyFlorida Atlantic UniversityBoca RatonUSA

Personalised recommendations