Advertisement

Verhandlungen pp 1252-1257 | Cite as

The ultrastructure of rat lung in the pre- and postnatal period. Some remarks on the fine structure of the foetal alveolar epithelium

  • Janusz Groniowski
  • Wiktor Djaczenko
Chapter

Abstract

Ultra-structural differences are to be expected between the cells of foetal lung epithelium and those of postnatal lung epithelium. Some definite idea upon the ultra-structure of lungs already engaged in respiration including alveolar epithelium, is given in a number of publications dealing with healthy lungs in normal animals and man (2, 5, 7, 8,9, 10, 15, 18). There are also some publications describing the ultrastructure of lung tissue in certain pathological states (11, 17, 18). The foetal lungs have been, as yet, the object of very few electron microscope examinations. In the literature obtainable, van Breemen, Neustein and Bruns (3) examined the lung tissue from premature human infants and young guinea-pigs compelled to breathe oxygen in conditions of high humidity, with the object of studying the formation of hyaline membranes. The publications of Schulz (19, 20) deal with the pathology of mitochondria of alveolar epithelial cells in rats. This author examines here the structural differences of mitochondria to be found in foetuses and after birth.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Angelt, F., e G. DE Blase: Arch. De Vecchi Anat. pat. 19, 339 (1953).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bargmann, W., u. A. Knoop: Z. Zellforsch. 44, 263 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Breemen, V. L. Van, H. B. Neustein and P. D. BRUNS: Amer. J. Path. 33, 769 (1957).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Davies, M. E., and E. L. Potter: J. Amer. med. Ass. 131, 1149 (1946).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Giesexing, R.: Beitr. path. Anat. 116, 177 (1956).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hayek, H. v.: Die menschliche Lunge. Berlin: Springer 1953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Karrer, H. E.: J. biophys. biochem. Cytol. 2, 241 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Karrer, H. E.: J. biophys. biochem. Cytol. 2, Suppl. 115 (1956).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Low, Frankn.: Anat. Rec. 117, 241 (1953).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. M. Sampaio: Anat. Rec. 127, 51 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Meessen, H., u. H. Schulz: Lungen und kleiner Kreislauf. Bad Oeynhausener Gespräche I, 19.-21. Oktober 1956. Berlin 1957.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Palade, G. E.: J. biophys. biochem. Cytol. 2, Suppl. 85 (1956).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pease, D. C.: J. biophys. biochem. Cytol. 2, Suppl. 203 (1956).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Policard, A., et M. BESSIS: Exp. Cell Res. 11, 490 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. Collet and S. Pregermain: Electron microscopy-Proceedings of the Stockholm Conference September 1956. p. 244 Stockholm 1957.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Potter, E. L.: Pathology of the fetus and the newborn. Chicago 1952.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Potter, E. L.: Schulz, H.: Naturwissenschaften 43 205 (1956).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Potter, E. L.: Virchows Arch. path. Anat. 328, 582 (1956).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Potter, E. L.: Verh. dtsch. Ges. Path. 41. Tagung. Stuttgart 1958, S. 342.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Potter, E. L.: Beitr. path. Anat. 119, 45 (1958).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1960

Authors and Affiliations

  • Janusz Groniowski
    • 1
  • Wiktor Djaczenko
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Pathological AnatomyAcademy of MedicinePoznańPoland

Personalised recommendations