Advertisement

Verhandlungen pp 1149-1156 | Cite as

Comparative studies on the fine structure of motor units

  • George A. Edwards
Chapter

Abstract

The problem in the consideration of the comparative aspects of motor units is that of determining whether muscle response is due to one given mechanism involving components of like structure, or to several mechanisms and unlike components in both nerve and muscle. Not long ago this problem was considered essentially physiologic, i. e., that variation in muscle response depended upon differences in mode of innervation of fixed muscle types and also upon the inherent properties of contractile substances.It is now evident that modifications occur in the fundamental intracellular components in relation to specific functional differences, and that differences exist among axons and neuromuscular junctions, as well as among muscle fibers.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hodge, A. J.: J. biophys. biochem. Cytol. 2, (Suppl.), 131 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Spiro, D.: J. biophys. biochem. Cytol. 2, (Suppl.), 157 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Huxley, A. F.: Brit. med. Bull. 12, 167 (1956).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Huxley, A. F.: Brit. med. Bull. 12, 171 (1956).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Krüger, P.: Tetanus und Tonus der quergestreiften Skeletmuskeln der Wirbeltiere und des Menschen. Leipzig: Akad. Verlagsges. 1952.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Caesar, R., G. A. Edwards and H. Ruska: J. biophys. biochem. Cytol., 3, 867 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Edwards, G. A., H. Ruska, P. Souza SAxzos and A. Vallejo-Freire: J. biophys. biochem. Cytol. 2, (Suppl.), 143 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Edwards, G. A., H. Riiska and E. De Harven: J. biophys. biochem. Cytol. 4, 251 (1958 b).Google Scholar
  9. 9. Edwards, G. A., H. Riiska and E. De Harven: J. biophys. biochem. Cytol. 4, 107 (1958 a).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ruska, H., G. A. Edwards and R. Caesar: Experientia (Basel) 14, 117 (1958).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hess, A.: Proc. roy. Soc. B 144, 496 (1956).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Robertson, J. D.: J. biophys. biochem. Cytol. 2, 381 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Roeder, K. D.: Insect Physiology. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc. 1953.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hoyle, G.: Nervous control of insect muscles, in: Recent advances in invertebrate physiology, University of Oregon Publications, Eugene, Oregon 1957.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1960

Authors and Affiliations

  • George A. Edwards
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Laboratories and ResearchNew York State Department of HealthAlbanyUSA

Personalised recommendations