Advertisement

Verhandlungen pp 888-892 | Cite as

Open face flat embedding technique

  • E. Borysko

Abstract

Preliminary studies of bacterial structure revealed, that these organisms were susceptible to damage during the polymerization of the acrylic embedding matrix, when a cure temperature of 60° C was used (1). Utilizing the principle that the internal stresses responsible for the damage could be relieved by maintaining the matrix in as fluid a condition as possible to the termination of the polymerization reaction (2, 3), the temperature of the curing oven was raised until, at a temperature of 95° C, polymerization damage of the bacteria could not be detected with an optical microscope.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Borysko, E., and H. Hoffman: In preparation.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Borysko, E. An evaluation, by phase contrast microscopy, of the methacrylate embedding technique used in the electron microscopy of cells. Doctoral Dissertation, The Johns Hopkins University 1955.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Borysko, E. J. biophys. biochem. Cytol. Suppl. 2, 3 (1956).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Borysko, E. and P. Sapranauskas: Bull. Johns Hopk. Hosp. 95, 68 (1953).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Price, C. C.: J. Polymer Sci. 1, 83 (1946).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Borysko, E., and J. Roslansky: Ann N Y Acad. Sci. Biology of Amoeba, 1958.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lang, R.: Rohm and Haas Company, Bristol, Pa. Personal communication, 1955.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Karrer, H.: J. biophys. biochem. Cytol. 2, 38 (1956).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Borysko, E.: J. biophys. biochem. Cytol. Suppl. 2, 15 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Porter, K. R., and J. Blur: Anat. Rec. 117, 685 (1953).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fernandez-moran, H.: J. biophys. biochem. Cytol. Suppl. 2, 29 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Barnes, C. E., R. M. Elofson and G. D. JONES: J. Amer. chem. Soc. 72, 210 (1950).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Anonymous: Rohm and Haas Comp. Bull. 169, Philadelphia, Pa. 1953.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Riddle, E. H.: Monomeric Acrylic Esters. New York: Reinhold Publ. Corp. 1954.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dahlstrom, B.: Rohm and Haas Comp. Philadelphia, Pa. Personal communication, 1958.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mayo, F. R.: Stanford Research Institute, Menlo Park, California. Personal communication, 1958.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mayo, F. R. and A. A. Miller: J. Amer. chem. Soc. S0, 2493 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dupont de Nemours Co.: Ind. Eng. Chem 28, 1160 (1936).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schulz, G., V. and F. Blaschke:Z. physik. Chem. 50B, 305 (1941).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Moore, D. H., and P. M. Grimley: J. biophys. biochem. Cytol. 3, 255 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1960

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Borysko
    • 1
  1. 1.The Murry and Leonie Guggenheim Foundation. Institute for Dental ResearchNew York University College of DentistryNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations