Advertisement

Molekulare Grundlagen der chemischen Sinne bei Insekten

  • Dietrich Schneider
Conference paper
Part of the Verhandlungen der Gesellschaft Deutscher Naturforscher und Ärzte book series (NATURFORSCHER, volume 106)

Abstract

Insect chemoreceptor cells send their distal processes into porous sensory hairs. The mechanism of stimulus transduction is deduced from the electrophysiological behaviour of the receptor cells. Only in some cases is the excitatory mechanism supposedly a mass effect (osmosis or ion-current). In general, we are dealing with an interaction between single stimulus particles and acceptor molecules. Many receptor cells are very specific and some olfactory cells are extremely sensitive as well.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. [1]
    Adam, D., Delbrück, M., in: Structural Chemistry and Molecular Biology, S. 198 (A. Rich and N. Davidson, Hrsg.). San Francisco-London: W. H. Freeman 1968.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Beidler, L. M.: J. Gen. Physiol. 38, 133 (1954).PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Boeckh, J.: Z. vergl. Physiol. 46, 212 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Boeckh, J.: ibid. 55, 378 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Boeckh, H., Kaissling, K. E., Schneider, D.: Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 30, 263 (1965).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Butenandt, A., et al.: Z. Naturforsch. 14b, 283 (1959).Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Butenandt, A., Hecker, E.: Angew. Chem. 73, 349 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Dethier, V. G.: Quart. Rev. Biol. 30, 348 (1955).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Dethier, V. G.: J. Econ. Entomol. 48, 235 (1955).Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Dethier, V. G.: The Physiology of Insect Senses. 1963, New York: Wiley; London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Dethier, V. G.: Science 161, 389 (1968).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Dethier, V. G., Rhoades, M. V.: J. exp. Zool. 126, 177 (1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Ernst, K. D.: Z. Zellforsch. mikr. Anat. 94, 72 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Evans, D. R., Mellon, De F.: J. Gen. Physiol. 45, 487 (1962).PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Evans, D. R., Mellon, De F.: ibid. 45, 651 (1962).Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Gillary, H. L.: ibid. 50, 337 (1966).Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Hansen, K., in: Olfaction and Taste III, S. 382 (C. Pfaffmann, Hrsg.). New York: Rockefeller Univ. Press 1969.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Hodgkin, A. L., Katz, B.: J. Physiol. 108, 37 (1949).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Hodgson, E. S.: Symp. zool. Soc. London 23, 269 (1968).Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Hodgson, E. S., Roeder, K. D.: J. Cell. Comp. Physiol. 48, 51 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Kafka, W. A.: Z. vergl. Physiol. 70, 105 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Kafka, W. A., in: Symp. on Gustation and Olfaction (G. Ohloff, Hrsg.). Genf: Firmenich 1971.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    Kaissling, K. E., in: [17], S. 52.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    Kaissling, K. E., Priesner, E.: Naturwissenschaften 57, 23 (1970).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Kasang, G.: Z. Naturforsch. 23 b, 1331 (1968).Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    Kasang, G., in: [22].Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    Minnich, D. E.: Anat. Rec. 37, 126 (1926).Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    Morita, H., in: [17], S. 370.Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    Morita, H., Shiraishi, A.: J. Gen. Physiol. 52, 559 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    Otter, C. J. den, Starre, H. van der: J. Insect Physiol. 13, 1177 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    Priesner, E., in: [17], S. 235.Google Scholar
  32. [32]
    Rees, C. J. C.: J. Insect Physiol. 14, 1331 (1968).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    Rees, C. J. C.: Proc. Roy. Soc. B 174, 469 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    Rees, C. J. C., Hori, N.: J. Insect Physiol. 14, 1499 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    Riddiford, L. M.: ibid. 16, 653 (1970).Google Scholar
  36. [36]
    Schneider, D.: Industrie-Elektronik (Hamburg) 3, 3 (1955).Google Scholar
  37. [37]
    Schneider, D.: Z. vergl. Physiol. 40, 8 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    Schneider, D.: Arbeitsgem. Forschg. Nordrhein-Westf., Heft 169 (1967). Westd. Verlg. Köln-Opladen.Google Scholar
  39. [39]
    Schneider, D., Boeckh, J.: Z. vergl. Physiol. 45, 405 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. [40]
    Schneider, D., Hecker, E.: Z. Naturforsch, 11 b, 121 (1956).Google Scholar
  41. [41]
    Schneider, D., et al.: Z. vergl. Physiol. 54, 192 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. [42]
    Schneider, D., Kaissling, K. E.: Zool. Jahrb. Anat. 76, 223 (1957).Google Scholar
  43. [43]
    Schneider, D., Kasang, G., Kaissling, K. E.: Naturwissenschaften 55, 395 (1968).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. [44]
    Steinbrecht, R. A., in: [17], S. 3.Google Scholar
  45. [45]
    Steinbrecht, R. A.: Z. Morph, d. Tiere 68, 93 (1970).Google Scholar
  46. [46]
    Stürckow, B., in: Olfaction and Taste II, S. 707 (T. Hayashi, Hrsg.). London: Pergamon Press 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. [47]
    Wiesmann, R.: Z. angew. Zool. 47, 159 (1960).Google Scholar
  48. [48]
    Wolbarsht, M. L.: Science 125, 1248 (1957).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1970

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dietrich Schneider
    • 1
  1. 1.Max-Planck-Institut für VerhaltensphysiologieSeewiesen

Personalised recommendations