Gendering and music streaming: Discourse and algorithms on a music streaming service
- 46 Downloads
In this article, the gendered aspects of music streaming are discussed as both discursive and material processes. Its findings are based on focus group discussions about music streaming, analysis of the functions of a music streaming service (Spotify), and examples of when this service promotes gender equality. Using a science and technology perspective and previous literature in the field, this article concludes that music streaming on Spotify displays several gendered cultural patterns and that gender stereotypes are challenged by Spotify. The main results are that the digitalization of music on Spotify has led listeners to masculinize expertise, and that algorithms promote successful white male rock artists. Spotify’s attempts to challenge this are located within isolated interventions, outside of the main code, with little chance of impacting upon listeners who are not already interested in gender equality. In the context of music streaming, discourse on gender often interacts with code to limit gender diversity while reproducing gender stereotypes.
SchlüsselwörterGender music streaming Spotify algorithms
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Andrejevic, M. (2013). Infoglut: How too much information is changing the way we think and know. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Armstrong, V. (2011). Technology and the gendering of music education. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Beer, D. (2008). Making friends with Jarvis Cocker: Music culture in the context of web 2.0. Cultural Sociology, 2, (2), 222 – 241.Google Scholar
- Bivens, R. (2015). Under the hood: The software in your feminist approach. Feminist Media Studies, 15, (4), 714 – 717.Google Scholar
- Bivens, R. 2017. The gender binary will not be deprogrammed: Ten years of coding gender on Facebook. New Media & Society, 19, (6), 880 – 898.Google Scholar
- Eriksson, M. & Johansson, A. (2017). Tracking gendered streams. Culture Unbound, 9, (2), 163 – 183.Google Scholar
- Fenton, N. (2012). The Internet and social networking. In J. Curran, N. Fenton, & D. Freedman (Eds.), Misunderstanding the Internet (pp. 123 – 148). Milton Park, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Gavanas, A. & Reitsamer, R. (2013). DJ technologies, social networks and gendered trajectories in European DJ cultures. In B. Attias, A. Gavanas, & H. C. Rietveld (Eds.), DJ culture in the mix: Power, technology, and social change in electronic dance music (pp. 51 – 77). New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
- Giesler, M. (2006). Cybernetic gift giving and social drama: A netnography of the Napster file-sharing community. In M. D. Ayers (Ed.), Cybersounds: Essays on virtual music culture (pp. 21 – 55). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
- Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar
- Johansson, S., Werner, A., Åker, P. & Goldenzwaig, G. (2018). Streaming music: Practices, media, cultures. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Kittler, F. (1999). Gramophone, film, typewriter. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Lafrance, M., Scheibling, C., Burns, L. & Durr, J. (2018). Race, gender and the Billboard Top 40 charts between 1997 and 2007. Popular Music and Society, 41, (5), 522 – 538.Google Scholar
- Latour, B. (1999). On recalling ANT. In J. Law & J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor network theory and after (pp. 15 – 25). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Latour, B. (2010). A collective of humans and nonhumans. In C. Hanks (Ed.), Technology and values: Essential readings (pp. 49 – 59). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Mackenzie, A. (2017). Machine learners: Archeology of data practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- McClary, S. (2006). This is not a story my people tell: Musical time and space according to Laurie Anderson. In A. Bennett, B. Shank, & J. Toynbee (Eds.), The popular music studies reader (pp. 21 – 28). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- McNeil, M. (2007). Feminist cultural studies of science and technology. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Morris, J. W. (2015). Curation by code: Infomediaries and the data mining of taste. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 18, (4 – 5), 446 – 463.Google Scholar
- Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
- Rogers, J. (2013). The death and life of the music industry in the digital age. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
- Smith, S. L., Choueiti, M., Pieper, K., Clark, H., Case, A. & Villanueva, S. (2019). Inclusion in the recording studio ? Gender and race/ethnicity of artists, songwriters and producers across 700 popular songs from 2012 – 2018, Los Angeles: USC Annenberg inclusion initiative. http://assets.uscannenberg.org/docs/aii-inclusion-recording-studio-2019.pdf. [Accessed 03. 04. 2019].
- Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
- Van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Werner, A. & Johansson, S. (2016). Experts, dads and technology: Gendered talk about online music. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 19, (2), 177 – 192.Google Scholar
- Werner, A. (2015). Moving forward: A feminist analysis of mobile music streaming. Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research, 7, (2), 197 – 213.Google Scholar
- Ann Werner (2020) Organizing music, organizing gender: algorithmic culture and Spotify recommendations. Popular Communication, 18, (1), 78 – 90, https://doi.org/10.1080/15405702.2020.1715980.