Advertisement

Custom Tokens und Smart Contracts zur Projektsteuerung

  • Johannes Lehner
  • Philipp Schützeneder
  • Johannes SametingerEmail author
Chapter
  • 210 Downloads
Part of the Edition HMD book series (EHMD)

Zusammenfassung

Blockchain-Anwendungen werden bisher primär für marktbezogene Transaktionen diskutiert. Wir ergänzen dies und fokussieren auf organisationsinterne Steuerungsprozesse. Dabei loten wir das Potenzial von Custom Tokens und Smart Contracts besonders für die Koordination und Steuerung von Projekten aus. Anwendungsversuche und Forschungen sind hier bisher noch spärlich. Das Projektmanagement bietet sich an, weil es sich durch eine hohe Standardisierung auszeichnet und bereits heute in hohem Masse durch IT unterstützt wird. Smart Contracts lassen sich mit entsprechenden Sprachen für die Implementierung von Projektaufträgen, von Meilensteinen sowie „Gates“ und des Projektabschlusses anwenden. Custom Tokens bieten dazu die Möglichkeit der Anreizgestaltung. Wir beleuchten mögliche Effekte vor dem Hintergrund sozialpsychologischer und organisationsbezogener Forschungen.

Schlüsselwörter

Custom Tokens Smart Contracts Kryptowährungen Projektsteuerung Projektkoordination Waves Oracles 

Literatur

  1. Androulaki E et al. (2018) Hyperledger fabric: a distributed operating system for permissioned blockchains. In: EuroSys ’18 proceedings of the thirteenth EuroSys conference, Article No. 30, Porto, Portogal – April 23–26, 2018, ACM, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Azanha A, Tiradentes Terra Argoud AR, Junior B d C, Joao Domingos Antoniolli P (2017) Agile project management with Scrum: a case study of a Brazilian pharmaceutical company IT project. Int J Manag Proj Bus 10(1):121–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baliga A, Subhod I, Kamat P, Chatterjee S (2018) Performance evaluation of the quorum blockchain platform, arXiv:1809.03421. https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.03421. Zugegriffen am 03.12.2019
  4. Brent L, Jurisevic A, Kong M, Liu E, Gauthier F, Gramoli V, Holz R, Scholz B (2018) Vandal: a scalable security analysis framework for smart contracts, arXiv:1809.03981. https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.03981. Zugegriffen am 03.12.2019
  5. Brown SL, Eisenhardt KM (1998) Competing on the Edge. Strategy as Structured Chaos. Harvard Business School Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  6. Buterin V (2016) Standardized contract APIs. https://github.com/ethereum/wiki/wiki/Standardized_Contract_APIs. Zugegriffen am 03.12.2019
  7. Cadsby CB, Song F, Tapon F (2007) Sorting and incentive effects of pay-for- performance: an experimental investigation. Acad Manag J 50:387–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cardano (2019) Homepage. https://www.cardano.org/en/what-is-cardano/. Zugegriffen am 03.12.2019
  9. Carpenter J, Dolifka D (2017) Exploitation aversion: when financial incentives fail to motivate agents. J Econ Psychol 61:213–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cerasoli CP, Nicklin JM, Ford MT (2014) Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: a 40-year meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 140(4):980–1008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. China’s Ministry of Industry and Information Technology Rankings (CCID) (2019). http://special.ccidnet.com/pub-bc-eval/index.shtml. Zugegriffen am 03.12.2019
  12. Christidis K, Devetsikiotis M (2016) Blockchains and smart contracts for the internet of things. IEEE Access 4:2292–2303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coinmarketcap (2019). http://www.coinmarketcap.com. Zugegriffen am 03.12.2019
  14. Cooper RG (2006) Managing technology development projects. Res Technol Manag 1990:23–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Crawford SES, Ostrom E (1995) A grammar of institutions. Am Polit Sci Rev 89(3):582–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Deci EL (1972) The effects of contingent and noncontingent rewards and controls on intrinsic motivation. Organ Behav Hum Perform 8(2):217–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. EOS.IO (2018) EOS.IO technical white paper v2 (2018). https://github.com/EOSIO/Documentation/blob/master/TechnicalWhitePaper.md. Zugegriffen am 03.12.2019
  18. Fenu G, Marchesi L, Marchesi M, Tonelli R (2018) The ICO phenomenon and its relationships with Ethereum smart contract environment. In: Blockchain oriented software engineering (IWBOSE), 2018 International Workshop on, Italy, 2018Google Scholar
  19. Fernandez AS, Le Roy F, Chiambaretto P (2017) Implementing the right project structure to achieve coopetitive innovation projects. Long Range Plan 51:384–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fiske ST (2011) Envy Up, Scorn Down. Russell Sage Foundation, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Frantz CK, Nowostawski M (2016) From institutions to code: towards automated generation of smart contracts. In: Proceedings – IEEE 1st international workshops on foundations and applications of self-systems (FAS-W) 2016 (November 2017):210–215Google Scholar
  22. Fudenberg D, Tirole J (1991) Game theory. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. Garbers Y, Konradt U (2014) The effect of financial incentives on performance: a quantitative review of individual and team-based financial incentives. J Occup Organ Psychol 87(1):102–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Garriga M, Arias M, De Renzis A (2018) Blockchain and cryptocurrency: a comparative framework of the main architectural drivers, arXiv:1812.08806. https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.08806. Zugegriffen am 03.12.2019
  25. Gerhart B, Rynes SL, Fulmer IS (2009) Pay and performance: individuals, groups, and executives. Acad Manag Ann 3(1):251–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Haji-Kazemi S, Andersen B, Klakegg OJ (2015) Barriers against effective responses to early warning signs in projects. Int J Proj Manag 33(5):1068–1083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Huffman D, Bognanno M (2017) High-powered performance pay and crowding out of nonmonetary motives. Manag Sci 64(10):4669–4680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jensen MC, Meckling WH (1976) Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J Financ Econ 3(4):305–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. JPMorganChase, Quorum (2019). https://github.com/jpmorganchase/quorum. Zugegriffen am 03.12.2019
  30. Lehner JM (2001) Praxisorientiertes Projektmanagement. Gabler, WiesbadenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lehner JM (2009) The staging model: the contribution of classical theatre directors to project management in development contexts. Int J Proj Manag 27(3):195–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Locke EE, Latham G (1990) Goal setting. A motivational technique that works! Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  33. Micobo Gmbh (2018) Difference between Ethereum, Hyperledger Fabric and R3 corda. https://medium.com/@micobo/technical-difference-betweenethereum-hyperledger-fabric-and-r3-corda-5a58d0a6e347. Zugegriffen am 03.12.2019
  34. Okhuysen GA, Bechky BA (2009) Coordination in organizations: an integrative perspective. Acad Manag Ann 3(1):463–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Olawale Y, Sun M (2015) Construction project control in the UK: current practice, existing problems and recommendations for future improvement. Int J Proj Manag 33(3):623–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ouchi WG (1980) Markets, bureaucracies, and clans. Adm Sci Q 25:129–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Parizi R.M., Amritraj, Dehghantanha A. (2018) Smart contract programming languages on blockchains: an empirical evaluation of usability and security. In: Chen S. et al. (eds) Blockchain – ICBC 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 10974. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94478-4_6. Zugegriffen am 03.12.2019Google Scholar
  38. PMBoK (2013) A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK Guide). Project Management Institute, Pennsylvania, USA. Zugegriffen am 03.12.2019Google Scholar
  39. Pollack J (2007) The changing paradigms of project management. Int J Proj Manag 25:266–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Provasi R, Farag S (2013) Accounting in ancient times: a review of classic references. Account Financ Hist Res Journal 5:68–87Google Scholar
  41. Ramezan G, Leung C (2018) A blockchain-based contractual routing protocol for the internet of things using smart contracts. Wirel Commun Mob Com. 2018: Article ID 4029591, 14 pages. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4029591. Zugegriffen am 03.12.2019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schützeneder P, Sametinger J, Lehner J (2018) Verwendung von Blockchain und Custom Tokens zur Projektkoordination – Ein Pilotversuch. HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik 55:1285. https://doi.org/10.1365/s40702-018-00446-w. Zugegriffen am 03.12.2019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sheth H, Dattani J (2019) Overview of blockchain technology. Asian journal for convergence in technology (AJCT). http://asianssr.org/index.php/ajct/article/view/728. Zugegriffen am 03.12.2019
  44. Shteynberg G, Galinsky AD (2011) Implicit coordination: sharing goals with similar others intensifies goal pursuit. J Exp Soc Psychol 47(6):1291–1294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sirer EG (2016) Thoughts on The DAO hack. http://hackingdistributed.com/2016/06/17/thoughts-on-the-dao-hack/. Zugegriffen am 03.12.2019
  46. Sklaroff J (2017) Smart contracts and the cost of inflexibility. Univ Pa Law Rev 166(263):262–303Google Scholar
  47. Staw BM (1976) Knee-deep in the big muddy: a study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. Organ Behav Hum Perform 16(1):27–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Turner JR (1999) The handbook of project management. McGraw Hill, LondonGoogle Scholar
  49. Turner JR, Cochrane RA (1993) The goals and methods matrix: coping with projects for which the goals and/or methods of achieving them are ill-defined. Int J Proj Manag 11(2):93–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Turner R, Ledwith A, Kelly J (2010) Project management in small to medium-sized enterprises: matching processes to the nature of the firm. Int J Proj Manag 28(8):744–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Um KH, Kim SM (2018) Collaboration and opportunism as mediators of the relationship between NPD project uncertainty and NPD project performance. Int J Proj Manag. Elsevier Ltd, APM and IPMA 36(4):659–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Waves (2019), Waves platform documentation. https://docs.wavesplatform.com/en. Zugegriffen am 03.12.2019
  53. Williamson OE (1981) The economics of organization: the transaction cost approach. Am J Sociol 87(3):548–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wüst K, Gervais A (2017) Do you need a blockchain? Department of Computer Science ETH, ZurichGoogle Scholar
  55. Zaharie MA, Osoian CL (2016) Peer review motivation frames: a qualitative approach. Eur Manag J 34(1):69–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Johannes Lehner
    • 1
  • Philipp Schützeneder
    • 1
  • Johannes Sametinger
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Johannes Kepler Universität LinzLinzÖsterreich

Personalised recommendations