Advertisement

Illicit side-engagements: Joachim Höflich and the micro-level analysis of walking and using the smartphone

  • Rich LingEmail author
Chapter

Zusammenfassung

I think that Joachim must know me in a unique, and particularly disarming way. As fellow academics, we have met at conferences, exchanged papers and have carried on with the standard form of academic collegiality. On this count, I must say that I always enjoy the chance to catch up with Joachim since he is an unusually good colleague.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Cahill, S. E. (1990). Childhood and public life: reaffirming biographical divisions. Social Problems, 37(3), 263–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chotpitayasunondh, V., & Douglas, K. M. (2016). How “phubbing” becomes the norm: The antecedents and consequences of snubbing via smartphone. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 9–18.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dunbar, G., Hill, R., & Lewis, V. (2001). Children’s attentional skills and road behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7(3), 227–234.Google Scholar
  4. Duncan, H. D. (1970). Communication and the social order. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  6. Goffman, E. (1963). Behavior in public places: Notes on the social organization of gatherings. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  7. Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in public: Microstudies of the public order. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  8. Hartmann, M., Rössler, P., & Hartmann, M. (2008). After the mobile phone?: Social changes and the development of mobile communication. Leipzig: Frank and Timme.Google Scholar
  9. Helbing, D. (2012). Self-organization in Pedestrian Crowds. In Social Self-Organization (pp. 71–99). Springer. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-24004-1_3.Google Scholar
  10. Höflich, J. (2003a). Mensch, Computer und Kommunikation. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  11. Höflich, J. (2003b). Part of two frames. In Mobile democracy: Essays on society, Self and politics (pp. 22–33). Vienna, Austria: Passagen Verlag.Google Scholar
  12. Höflich, J. (2005). A certain sense of place. In K. Nyiri (Ed.), A sense of place–the global and the local in mobile communication, Passagen Verlag (pp. 159–168). Vienna: Passagen Verlag.Google Scholar
  13. Höflich, J. (2006). The mobile phone and the dynamic between private and public communication: Results of an international exploratory study. Knowledge, Technology & Policy, 19(2), 58–68.Google Scholar
  14. Höflich, J. (2014). The mobile phone: Bringing the private into the public. Empirical notes on the situational arrangement of communicative behavior. In E. Wyss (Ed.), Communication of Love. Mediatized Intimacy from Love Letters to SMS. Interdisciplinary and Historical Studies (pp. 151–164). Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.Google Scholar
  15. Höflich, J., & Gebhart, J. (Eds.). (2005). Mobile Kommunikation: Perspektriven und Forschungsfelder. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  16. Höflich, J., & Kircher, G. F. (2010). Moving and lingering: the mobile phone in public space. Mobile Media and the Change of Everyday Life, Peter Lang, 61–96.Google Scholar
  17. Höflich, J. R., Kircher, G. F., Linke, C., & Schlote, I. (2012). Mobile media and the change of everyday life. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  18. Hoogendoorn, S. P., & Daamen, W. (2005). Pedestrian behavior at bottlenecks. Transportation Science, 39(2), 147–159.Google Scholar
  19. Hughes, R. L. (2003). The flow of human crowds. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 35(1), 169–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hyman, I. e., Boss, S. M., Wise, B. M., McKenzie, K. E., & Caggiano, J. M. (2010). Did you see the unicycling clown? Inattentional blindness while walking and talking on a cell phone. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(5), 597–607.Google Scholar
  21. Jackson, T. (1952). Some variables in role conflict analysis. Social Forces, 30, 323–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lamberg, E. M., & Muratori, L. M. (2012). Cell phones change the way we walk. Gait & Posture, 35(4), 688–690.Google Scholar
  23. Lim, J., Amado, A., Sheehan, L., & Van Emmerik, R. E. (2015). Dual task interference during walking: The effects of texting on situational awareness and gait stability. Gait & Posture, 42(4), 466–471.Google Scholar
  24. Lin, M.-I. B., & Huang, Y.-P. (2017). The impact of walking while using a smartphone on pedestrians’ awareness of roadside events. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 101, 87–96.Google Scholar
  25. Nasar, J. L., & Troyer, D. (2013). Pedestrian injuries due to mobile phone use in public places. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 57, 91–95.Google Scholar
  26. Rainie, L., & Zickuhr, K. (2015). Americans’ Views on Mobile Etiquette. Washington D.C.: Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/08/26/americansviews-on-mobile-etiquette/.
  27. Rössler, P., & Höflich, J. (2002). Mobile written communication, or email on your cellular phone: uses of the short message service (SMS by German Adolescents- a pilot study. In The social and cultural impact/meaning of mobile communication (pp. 133–158). Chunchon, Korea: School of Communication Hallym University.Google Scholar
  28. Seedat, M., MacKenzie, S., & Mohan, D. (2006). The phenomenology of being a female pedestrian in an African and an Asian city: A qualitative investigation. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 9(2), 139–153.Google Scholar
  29. Sennett, R. (1992). The Fall of Public Man (Reissue edition). New York; London: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  30. Simmel, G. (1971). The Metropolis and Mental Life. In D. N. Levine (Ed.), Georg Simmel: On individuality and social forms (pp. 324–399). University of Chicago: Chicago.Google Scholar
  31. Vanden Abeele, Hendrickson, Andrew T., Pollmann, Monique M. H., & Ling, R. (2019). Phubbing behavior in conversations and its relation to conversation intimacy and distraction: An observation study. Computers in Human Behavior.Google Scholar
  32. Wolfinger, N. H. (1995). Passing moments: Some social dynamics of pedestrian interaction. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 24(3), 323–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and InformationNanyang Technological UniversitySingapurSingapur

Personalised recommendations