Enabling the digital economy - distributed ledger technologies for automating IP licensing payments

  • Frank TietzeEmail author
  • Ove Granstrand


Developing innovations for the digital economy, such as IoT devices and connected mobility solutions is likely to require OEMs to combine IP from multiple sources (licensors) who exploit their IP to as many as possible licensees (other OEMs). Those involved in the provision of what we call distributed multi-IP solutions (d-mIPs) find themselves entangled in a complex many-to-many network or ‘licensing web’ having to operate payments based on licensing contracts under a variety of terms and conditions. In the digital economy and ‘pro-licensing era’ efficiently operating licensing payments to/from multiple licensors/licensees becomes increasingly mission-critical. Unfortunately, the current semi-manual processes are inherent of information asymmetries, uncertainties, trust problems and transaction costs, hence must be considered as inefficient. This paper discusses the challenges licensees and licensors face when operating licensing payments for d-mIPs. We propose a system based on distributed ledger technologies and smart contracts for automating trustworthy licensing payments that can substantially reduce currently existing challenges. The proposed system not only contributes to enabling the digital economy, but has further potential to enable new business models.


Licensing payments intellectual property digital ledger technologies distributed multi-IP solutions (d-mIPs) smart contracts bill of IP 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Akerlof, G.A., 1978. The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism, in: Uncertainty in Economics. Elsevier, pp. 235–251.Google Scholar
  2. Alexopoulos, N., Habib, S.M., Mühlhäuser, M., 2018. Towards Secure Distributed Trust Management on a Global Scale: An analytical approach for applying Distributed Ledgers for authorization in the IoT, in: Proceedings of the 2018 Workshop on IoT Security and Privacy - IoT S&P ’18. Presented at the the 2018 Workshop, ACM Press, Budapest, Hungary, pp. 49–54.
  3. Aristodemou, L., Tietze, F., 2018. The state-of-the-art on Intellectual Property Analytics (IPA): A literature review on artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning methods for analysing intellectual property (IP) data. World Pat. Inf. 55, 37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aristodemou, L., Tietze, F., Athanassopoulou, N., Minshall, T., 2017. Exploring the future of patent analytics: a technology roadmapping approach.Google Scholar
  5. Atzori, L., Iera, A., Morabito, G., 2010. The internet of things: A survey. Comput. Netw. 54, 2787–2805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baraniuk, C., 2016. Government urged to use digital ledgers.Google Scholar
  7. Bezozi, H.I., 2017. Money Trapped: Miscalculations of Royalty and Licensing Income Resulting in Significant Underpayment to Creative Artists. Your Financ. Wizard. URL (accessed 4.6.19).
  8. BigchainDB GmbH, 2018. BigchainDB 2.0 - The Blockchain Database.Google Scholar
  9. Blackman, C.R., 1998. Convergence between telecommunications and other media: How should regulation adapt? Telecommun. Policy 22, 163–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bogers, M., Bekkers, R., Granstrand, O., 2012. Intellectual property and licensing strategies in open collaborative innovation, in: Open Innovation in Firms and Public Administrations: Technologies for Value Creation. IGI global, pp. 37–58.Google Scholar
  11. Burns, D., Sandelin, J., 1998. Licence Agreements: Are You Getting the Royalties You Bargained For? Ind. High. Educ. 12, 155–160. Scholar
  12. Cai, C.W., 2018. Disruption of financial intermediation by FinTech: a review on crowdfunding and blockchain. Account. Finance 58, 965–992. Scholar
  13. Chavez-Dreyfuss, G., 2016. Sweden tests blockchain technology for land registry. Reuters June 16.Google Scholar
  14. Chesbrough, H.W., 2006. Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
  15. Cohen, B., Kietzmann, J., 2014. Ride on! Mobility business models for the sharing economy. Organ. Environ. 27, 279–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cohen, M.A., Agrawal, N., Agrawal, V., 2006. Achieving breakthrough service delivery through dynamic asset deployment strategies. Interfaces 36, 259–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dinges, V., Urmetzer, F., Martinez, V., Zaki, M., Neely, A., 2015. The future of servitization: Technologies that will make a difference. Camb. Serv. Alliance Univ. Camb. Camb.Google Scholar
  18. Eppinger, E., 2015. Patentpools: Eigenschaften, Motive und Implikationen. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  19. European Union Blockchain Observatory, 2018. Blockchain Innovation in Europe.Google Scholar
  20. Felix, E., Martin, H., Christopher, N., Josip, S., 2018. Intellectual Property Protection and Licensing of 3D Print with Blockchain Technology. Adv. Transdiscipl. Eng. 103–112.
  21. Fernández-Caramés, T.M., Fraga-Lamas, P., 2018. Towards the internet-of-smart-clothing: A review on IoT wearables and garments for creating intelligent connected E-textiles. Electron. Switz. 7. Scholar
  22. Gilbert, R.J., 2010. Deal or No Deal-Licensing Negotiations in Standard-Setting Organizations. Antitrust LJ 77, 855.Google Scholar
  23. Granstrand, O., 2004. The economics and management of technology trade: towards a pro-licensing era? Int. J. Technol. Manag. 27, 209–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Granstrand, O., 2003. Are we on our way in the new economy with optimal inventive steps?, in: Economics, Law and Intellectual Property. Springer, pp. 223–258.Google Scholar
  25. Granstrand, O., 1999. The Economics and Management of Intellectual Property: Towards Intellectual Capitalism. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA, Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  26. Granstrand, O., Oskarsson, C., 1994. Technology diversification in” MUL-TECH” corporations. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 41, 355–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gubbi, J., Buyya, R., Marusic, S., Palaniswami, M., 2013. Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 29, 1645–1660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hamari, J., Sjöklint, M., Ukkonen, A., 2016. The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 67, 2047–2059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Holland, M., Nigischer, C., Stjepandic, J., 2017. Copyright protection in additive manufacturing with blockchain approach. Presented at the Advances in Transdisciplinary Engineering, pp. 914–921.
  30. Holland, M., Stjepandic, J., Nigischer, C., 2018. Intellectual Property Protection of 3D Print Supply Chain with Blockchain Technology. Presented at the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation, ICE/ITMC 2018 - Proceedings.
  31. Holzmann, T., Sailer, K., Katzy, B.R., 2014. Matchmaking as multi-sided market for open innovation. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 26, 601–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Iqbal, R., Butt, T.A., Afzaal, M., Salah, K., 2019. Trust management in social Internet of vehicles: Factors, challenges, blockchain, and fog solutions. Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw. 15. Scholar
  33. Jabbar, K., Bjørn, P., 2018. Infrastructural grind: Introducing blockchain technology in the shipping domain. Presented at the Proceedings of the International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work, pp. 297–308.
  34. Karamitsos, I., Papadaki, M., Al Barghuthi, N.B., 2018. Design of the blockchain smart contract: A Use Case for Real Estate. J. Inf. Secur. 9, 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kiernan, V.J., 1998. Protecting Your Royalty Payments Using Audit Clauses in Licence Agreements. Ind. High. Educ. 12, 161–163. Scholar
  36. Kodama, F., 1992. Technology Fusion and the new R&D. Harv. Bus. Rev.Google Scholar
  37. Krishnan, A.S.A., Chakravarti, A.K., 1997. Intellectual property rights in the ensuing global digital economy. Electron. Inf. Plan. 24.Google Scholar
  38. Kundu, D., Kundu, D., 2019. Blockchain and Trust in a Smart City. Environ. Urban. ASIA. Scholar
  39. Lasi, H., Fettke, P., Kemper, H.-G., Feld, T., Hoffmann, M., 2014. Industry 4.0. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 6, 239–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lin, J., Zhang, A., Shen, Z., Chai, Y., 2018. Blockchain and IoT based food traceability for smart agriculture. Presented at the ACM International Conference Proceeding Series.
  41. Ma, Z., Jiang, M., Gao, H., Wang, Z., 2018. Blockchain for digital rights management. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 89, 746–764. Scholar
  42. Mathews, M., Robles, D., Bowe, B., n.d. BIM+Blockchain: A Solution to the Trust Problem in Collaboration? 11.Google Scholar
  43. McConaghy, M., McMullen, G., Parry, G., McConaghy, T., Holtzman, D., 2017. Visibility and digital art: blockchain as an ownership layer on the Internet. Strateg. Change 26, 461–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Meyer, T.A., Tinney, C.H., Tinney, T.J., 1985. Guidelines for corporate trademark licensing. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 2, 196–204. Scholar
  45. Montecchi, M., Plangger, K., Etter, M., 2019. It’s real, trust me! Establishing supply chain provenance using blockchain. Bus. Horiz. Scholar
  46. Nakamoto, S., 2008. Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system.Google Scholar
  47. Nalebuff, B.J., Brandenburger, A.M., 1997. Co-opetition: Competitive and cooperative business strategies for the digital economy. Strategy Leadersh. 25, 28–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Notheisen, B., Cholewa, J.B., Shanmugam, A.P., 2017. Trading Real-World Assets on Blockchain: An Application of Trust-Free Transaction Systems in the Market for Lemons. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 59, 425–440. Scholar
  49. O’Dair, M., 2018. Distributed creativity: how blockchain technology will transform the creative economy. Springer.Google Scholar
  50. Pãnescu, A.-T., Manta, V., 2018. Smart Contracts for Research Data Rights Management over the Ethereum Blockchain Network. Sci. Technol. Libr. 37, 235–245. Scholar
  51. Park, J.-S., Youn, T.-Y., Kim, H.-B., Rhee, K.-H., Shin, S.-U., 2018. Smart contract-based review system for an IoT data marketplace. Sens. Switz. 18. Scholar
  52. Ramachandran, A., Kantarcioglu, M., 2018. Smartprovenance: A distributed, blockchain based data provenance system. Presented at the CODASPY 2018 - Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Data and Application Security and Privacy, pp. 35–42.
  53. Royalty Exchange, 2017. Even Quincy Jones Gets Underpaid. How To Collect All The Royalties You’re Due. [WWW Document]. R. Exch. URL (accessed 4.6.19).
  54. Rycroft, R.W., Kash, D.E., 1999. The complexity challenge: Technological innovation for the 21st century. Cengage Learning EMEA.Google Scholar
  55. Savelyev, A., 2018. Copyright in the blockchain era: Promises and challenges. Comput. Law Secur. Rev. 34, 550–561. Scholar
  56. Scotchmer, S., 1999. Cumulative innovation in theory and practice. Graduate School of Public Policy, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  57. Slack, N., S. Chambers, C. Harland, A. Harrison and R. Johnston, 1995. Operations Management, Pitman Publishing.Google Scholar
  58. Somaya, D., Teece, D., Wakeman, S., 2011. Innovation in multi-invention contexts: Mapping solutions to technological and intellectual property complexity. Calif. Manage. Rev. 53, 47–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Spielman, A., 2016. Blockchain: digitally rebuilding the real estate industry (PhD Thesis). Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  60. Stigler, G.J., 1961. The economics of information. J. Polit. Econ. 69, 213–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Suzuki, S.-I., 2011. Introduction to patent map analysis. Jpn. Pat. Off. 1–50.Google Scholar
  62. Swan, M., 2015. Blockchain: Blueprint for a New Economy.Google Scholar
  63. Tapscott, D., 1999. Blueprint to the digital economy: Creating wealth in the era of e-business. McGraw-Hill, Inc.Google Scholar
  64. Tapscott, D., 1996. The digital economy: Promise and peril in the age of networked intelligence. McGraw-Hill New York.Google Scholar
  65. Teece, D.J., 2018. Profiting from innovation in the digital economy: Enabling technologies, standards, and licensing models in the wireless world. Res. Policy 47, 1367–1387. Scholar
  66. Teece, D.J., 2012. Next-generation competition: New concepts for understanding how innovation shapes competition and policy in the digital economy. JL Econ Pol 9, 97.Google Scholar
  67. Teece, D.J., 1986. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Res. Policy 15, 285–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tietze, F., 2012. Technology market transactions: auctions, intermediaries and innovation. Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  69. Tietze, F., Schiederig, T., Herstatt, C., 2013. Firms’ transition to green product service system innovators: cases from the mobility sector. Int. J. Technol. Manag. 63, 51–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tomar, V., 2009. Trademark licensing & franchising: Trends in transfer of rights. J. Intellect. Prop. Rights 14, 397–404.Google Scholar
  71. Treece, J.M., 1967. Trademark Licensing and Vertical Restraints in Franchising Arrangements. U Pa Rev 116, 435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Urien, P., 2019. Blockchain IoT (BIoT): A new direction for solving internet of things security and trust issues. Presented at the 3rd Cloudification of the Internet of Things Conference, CIoT 2018.
  73. Veuger, J., 2018. Trust in a viable real estate economy with disruption and blockchain. Facilities 36, 103–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Walport, M., 2015. Distributed Ledger Technology: Beyond Block Chain.Google Scholar
  75. Wibowo, S., Hw, E.P., 2018. Blockchain Implementation Assessment Framework, Case Study of IoT LPWA Licensing in Indonesia. Presented at the Proceeding - 2018 International Conference on ICT for Smart Society: Innovation Toward Smart Society and Society 5.0, ICISS 2018.
  76. Williamson, O.E., 1975. Markets and hierarchies. N. Y. 2630.Google Scholar
  77. Yli-Huumo, J., Ko, D., Choi, S., Park, S., Smolander, K., 2016. Where Is Current Research on Blockchain Technology?-A Systematic Review. PloS One 11, e0163477. Scholar
  78. Yu, B., Wright, J., Nepal, S., Zhu, L., Liu, J., Ranjan, R., 2018. Trust chain: Establishing trust in the iot-based applications ecosystem using blockchain. IEEE Cloud Comput. 5, 12–23. Scholar
  79. Zhang, D., Zhang, Z., Chen, L., Li, S., Huang, Q., Liu, Y., 2018. Blockchain Technology Hyperledger Framework in the Internet of Energy. Presented at the IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. Scholar
  80. Zhang, Z., Zhao, L., 2018. A design of digital rights management mechanism based on blockchain technology. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinforma. 10974 LNCS, 32–46. Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Technology ManagementUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations