Advertisement

Psychologische Aspekte des Wechselmodells: Was tut Müttern – Vätern – Kindern gut?

  • Hildegund SünderhaufEmail author
Chapter
  • 88 Downloads

Zusammenfassung

Rund 40 Jahre Scheidungsfolgenforschung haben gezeigt, dass vor allem Konflikte zwischen den Eltern den Kindern schaden, der Verlust eines Elternteils und Aufwachsen in Armut bei einem alleinerziehenden Elternteil. Die internationale psychologische Forschung, speziell zu Betreuung im Wechselmodell und dessen Auswirkungen auf die Kinder und Eltern, gibt interessante Anregungen zu diesen Fragen. Aus den internationalen Forschungsergebnissen, die die Lebenserfahrungen von vielen hunderttausend Kindern auswerten, lassen sich auch ganz praktische Hinweise für einen Elternratgeber ableiten. Das Reizthema „Hochstrittigkeit“ wird zwischen möglicher psychischer Erkrankung und Prozesstaktik diskutiert und die Annahmen der Forschung zu Hochkonflikthaftigkeit zusammengefasst. Er zeigt sich die Notwendigkeit einer individuell auf die Bedürfnisse und Möglichkeiten der Familienmitglieder abgestimmten Betreuungslösung.

Literatur

  1. Abarbanel, A. (1979). Shared parenting after separation and divorce: A study of joint custody. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 49, 320–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amann. Th. (2016). Auswirkungen von Formen der Nachtrennungsfamilie – unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Doppelresidenz. Master Thesis, University of Wien, Wien.Google Scholar
  3. Amato, P. (1993). Children’s adjustment to divorce: Theories, hypotheses, and empirical support. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amato, P. (2001). Children of divorce in the 1990s: An update of the amato and keith (1991) meta-analysis. Journal of Family Psychology, 15(3), 355–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Amato, P., & Gilbreth, J. (1999). Nonresident fathers and children´s well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 557–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Amato, P., & Keith, B. (1991a). Parental divorce and the well-being of children: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 110(1), 26–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Amato, P., & Keith, B. (1991b). Parental divorce and adult well-being. A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Aquilino, W. (2006). The noncustodial father-child relationship from adolescence into young adulthood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68(4), 929–946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bauserman, R. (2002). Child adjustment in joint-custody versus sole-custody arrangements: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Family Psychology, 16(1), 91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bauserman, R. (2012). A meta-analysis of parental satisfaction, adjustment, and conflict in joint custody and sole custody following divorce. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 53, 464–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bergström, M. (2012). Barn med växelvis boende (Kinder in abwechselnder Betreuung). In Centre for Health Equity-Studies (Hrsg.). Schulrelevante Aspekte für die psychische Gesundheit von Kindern und Jugendlichen – Eine Studie auf der Grundlage einzel-staatlicher umfassender Studien in den Klassen 6 und 9 – Herbst 2009, (Kap. 5, S. 71–81). www.sociastyrelsen.se, Mai 2012.
  12. Bergström, M., Modin, B., Fransson, E., Rajmil, L., Berlin, M., Gustafsson, P., & Hjern, A. (2013). Living in two homes – A swedish national survey of wellbeing in 12 and 15-year-olds with joint physical custody. MBMC Public Health, 13, 868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bergström, M., Fransson, E., Modin, B., Berlin, M., Gustafsson, P., & Hjern, A. (2015). Fifty moves a year: Is there an association between joint physical custody and psychosomatic problems in children? Journal of Epidemial & Community Health, 69(8), 769–774. online-publication 2015-04-28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bergström, M., Fransson, E., Fabian, H., Hjern, A., Sarkadi, A., & Salari, R. (2017). Preschool children living in joint physical custody arrangements show less psychological symptoms than those living mostly or only with one parent. Acta Paediatrica, 107, 294–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bjarnason, T., & Arnarsson, A. (2011). Joint physical custody and communication with parents: A cross-national study of children in 36 western countries. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 42(6), 871–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bjarnason, T., Bendtsen, P., Arnarsson, A., Borup, I., Ianotti, R., Löfstedt, P., Haapasalo, I., & Niclasen, B. (2012). Life satisfaction among children in different family structures: A comparative study of 36 western societies. Children and Society, 26, 51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Breivik, K., & Olweus, D. (2006). Adolescent’s adjustment in four post-divorce family structures: Single mother, stepfather, joint physical custody and single father families. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 44, 99–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cashmore, J., Parkinson, P., Weston, R., Patulny, R., Redmond, G., Qu, L., Baxter, J., Rajkovic, M., Sitek, T., & Katz, I. (2010). Shared care parenting arrangements since the 2006 family law reforms: Report to the australian government attorney-general’s department sidney. Social Policy Research Centre: University of New South Wales.Google Scholar
  19. Cottier, M., Widmer, E., Tornare, S., & Girardin, M. (2017). Interdisziplinäre Studie zur alternierenden Obhut. https://www.ejpd.admin.ch/ejpd/de/home/aktuell/news/2017/2017-12-08.html.
  20. Czerny, B. (2011). Doppelresidenz in Österreich - die Perspektive der Mütter. Unveröffentlichte Diplomarbeit, Universität Wien. Online-Zugriff unter: http://othes.univie.ac.at/10683/1/2010-07-23_0501995.pdf.
  21. Fabricius, W. (2003). Listening to children of divorce. New findings that diverge from wallerstein. Lewis and Blakesly. Family Relations, 52, 385–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fabricius, W. V. & Hall, J. A. (2000). Young adult’s perspectives on divorce: Living arrangements. Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 38, 446–461.Google Scholar
  23. Fabricius, W., & Luecken, L. (2007). Postdivorce living arrangements, parent conflict, and long-term physical health correlates for children of divorce. Journal of Family Psychology, 21(2), 195–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fabricius, W., Sokol, K., Diaz, P., & Braver, S. (2012). Parenting time, parent conflict, parent-child relationship and children’s physical health. In K. Kuehnle & L. Drozd (Hrsg.), Parenting plan evaluations: Applied research for the family court (S. 188–213). Cambridge: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fortin, J., Hunt, J., & Scanlan L. (2012). Taking a longer view of contact: The perspectives of young adults who experienced parental separation in their youth. University of Sussex, Susex Law School.Google Scholar
  26. Frigger, M. (2008). Heute hier, morgen dort? – Das Wechselmodell im Familienrecht – Eine Pilotstudie. Diplomarbeit, Universität Bielefeld. Online-Zugriff unter: http://www.system-familie.de/michael_frigger_wechselmodell.pdf.
  27. Fransson, E., Hjern, A., & Bergström, M. (2019). Sind schwedische Kinder anders? Sozialmagazin, Themenheft „Elterliche Trennungen“, 5–6, 31–37.Google Scholar
  28. Haugen, G. M. D. (2010). Children’s Perspective on Everyday Experiences of Shared Residence: Time, Emotions and Agency Dilemmas. Children & Society, 24, 112–122.Google Scholar
  29. Irving, H. & Benjamin, M. (1991). Shared and Sole-Custody Parents: A Comparative Analysis. In: Folberg, J. (Hrsg.) (1991). Joint Custody & Shared Parenting, 2. Aufl., New York, London: Guilford Press, 114–131.Google Scholar
  30. Kaspiew, R., Gray, M., Weston, R., Moloney, L., Hand, K., & Qu, L. (2009). Evaluation of the 2006 family law reforms. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.Google Scholar
  31. Kelly, J., & Lamb, M. (2000). Using child development research to make appropriate custody and access decision for young children. Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 38(3), 297–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lakin, M. (1995). Domestic migrations: Effects on youngsters of postdivorce joint physical custody circumstances. Dissertaton, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  33. Laumann-Billings, L. & Emery, R. E. (2000). Distress among young adults from divorced families. Journal of Family Psychology, 14, 671–687.Google Scholar
  34. Luepnitz, D. (1982). Child custody. A study of families after divorce. Lexington Massachusettss: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  35. Luepnitz, D. (1986). A comparison of maternal, paternal, and joint custody: Understanding the varieties of post-divorce family life. Journal of Divorce, 9(3), 1–12. Abdruck: Folberg (Hrsg.). (1991). Joint custody & shared parenting (2. Aufl., S. 105–113). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  36. Luecken, L. J., & Fabricius, W. V. (2003). Physical health vulnerability in adult children from divorced and intact families. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 55, 221–228.Google Scholar
  37. Luftensteiner, S. (2010). Doppelresidenz in Österreich - die Perspektive der Kinder. Unveröffentlichte Diplomarbeit, Universität Wien. Online-Zugriff ab 15.9.2013 unter: http://othes.univie.ac.at/14850/.
  38. Maccoby, E., Buchanan, Ch., Mnookin, R., & Dornbusch, S. (1993). Postdivorce roles of mothers and fathers in the lives of their children. Journal of Family and Psychology, 7(1), 24–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McKinnon, R., & Wallerstein, J. (1986). Joint custody and the preschool child. Behavioral Sciences & The Law, 4(2), 169–183. Zusammenfassung In Folberg (Hrsg.) (1991). Joint custody & shared parenting (2. Aufl., S. 153–166). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  40. McIntosh, J. E., Wells, Y., Smyth, B., & Long, C. (2008). Child focused and child inclusive divorce mediation: Comparative outcomes from a prospective study of post-separation adjustment. Family Court Review, 14, 105–124.Google Scholar
  41. McIntosh, J. E., Smyth, B., Kelaher, M., Wells, Y., & Long, C. (2010). Parenting arrangements post-separation: Patterns and outcomes Part I: A longitudinal study of school-aged children in high-conflict divorce. Report to the Australian Government, Attorney General’s Department: Canberra. UND: Parenting arrangements post-separation: Patterns and outcomes Part II: Relationship between overnight care patterns and psycho-emotional development in infants and young children (S. 85–169). North Carlton, Victoria: Family Transitions. Online-Zugriff unter: http://www.ag.gov.au.
  42. Melli, M., & Brown, P. (2008). Exploring a new family form: The shared time family. International Journal of Law, Policy and Family, 22(2), 231–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Neoh, J., & Mellor, D. (2010). Shared parenting: Adding children’s voices and their measures of adjustment to the evaluation. Journal of Child Custody, 7, 155–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nielsen, L. (2018). Joint versus sole physical custody: Outcomes for children independent of family income or parental conflict. Journal of Child Custody, 15(1), 35–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nielsen, L. (2019). Wechselmodell versus Residenzmodell – Was sagt uns die Forschung über die Auswirkungen auf die Kinder? Sozialmagazin, Themenheft „Elterliche Trennungen“, 5–6, 38–44.Google Scholar
  46. Neugebauer, R. (1989). Divorce, Custody, and Visitation: The Child’s Point of View. In: Everett, Craig (Hrsg.): Children of Divorce, New York: The Haworth Press, 153–168.Google Scholar
  47. Pearson, J., & Thoennes, N. (1990). Custody after divorce: Demographic and attitudinal patterns. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 60(2), 233–249. Nachdruck unter dem titel child custody and child support after divorce In Folberg (Hrsg.) (1991). Joint custody & shared parenting (2. Aufl., S. 185–205). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  48. Pryor, J., & Rogers, B. (2001). Children in changing families – Life after parental separation. Oxford: Blackwell Publisher.Google Scholar
  49. Shapiro, A., & Lambert, J. (1999). Longitudinal effects of divorce on the quality of the father-child relationship and on fathers’ psychological well-being. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 387–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Smart, C., Neale, B., & Wade, A. (2001). The changing experiences of childhood. Family and Divorce. Cambridge, UK: Policy.Google Scholar
  51. Spruijt, E., & Duindam, V. (2010). Joint physical custody in the netherlands and the well-being of children. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 51, 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Steinmann, S. (1981). The experience of children in a joint-custody arrangement: A report of a Study. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 51, 403–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sünderhauf, H. (2013). Wechselmodell – Psychologie, Recht, Praxis. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Turunen, J. (2015). Shared physical custody and children’s experience of stress, family and societies, Working Paper Series, 24/2015 und Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 2017, 58(5), S. 371–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Underwood, L. (1989). Joint physical custody: An exploration of successful coparenting arrangements. Dissertation, University of Toledo, Ohio.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Evangelische Hochschule NürnbergNürnbergDeutschland

Personalised recommendations