More solidarity than meets the eye? Challenges and prospects for social Europe

  • Maurizio FerreraEmail author


EU citizenship has long been considered as a mere instrument to uphold a common labor market resting on free movement. Worker mobility is, however, raising increasing social and political strains within and between countries. The paper argues that EU benefits should be made more visible and salient for ‘stay at home’ people, in order to defuse the formation of a potentially disruptive cleavage between stayers and movers. This can only be done through enhancing the social dimension of EU citizenship, building on existing but poorly visible EU funds and programs.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alber, Jens. 1982. Vom Armenhaus zum Wohlfahrtsstaat. Analysen zur Entwicklung der Sozialversicherung in Westeuropa. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
  2. Andor, Lazslo. 2015. “Fair Mobility in Europe”. Social Europe, January.
  3. Armingeon, Klaus. 2018. “Die Entwicklung der schweizerischen Altersvorsorge.” Swiss Political Science Review 24 (1): 43-52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Armingeon, Klaus, and Skyler Cranmer. 2017. “Position-taking in the Euro Crisis.” Journal of European Public Policy 25 (4): 546-566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Badinger, Harald. 2005. “Growth Effects of Economic Integration: Evidence from the EU Member States.” Review of World Economics 141 (1): 50-78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burgess, Michael. 2005. In Search of the Federal Spirit. New Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives in Comparative Federalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Campos, Nauro F., Fabrizio Coricelli, and Luigi Moretti. 2014. “Economic Growth and Political Integration: Synthetic Counterfactuals Evidence from Europe”. IZA Discussion Paper 8162.Google Scholar
  8. Chassard, Yves, and Paola Venturini. 1995. “La Dimension Européenne de la Protection Sociale.” Droit Social 9 (10): 63-91.Google Scholar
  9. Claeys, Grégory, Zsolt Darvas, and Guntram B. Wolff. 2014. “Benefits and Drawbacks of European Unemployment Insurance.” Bruegel Policy Brief 6.
  10. Dahrendorf, Ralf. 1995. Quadrare il cerchio. Bari-Roma: Laterza.Google Scholar
  11. Della Sala, Vincenzo. 2013. Myth and the Post-national Polity: The Case of the European Union. In Whither National Myths? Reflections on the Present and Future of National Myths, edited by Gérard Bouchard, 157-72. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Dyson, Kenneth. 2014. States, Debt and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. European Commission. 2013. A Fact Finding Analysis on the Impact on the Member States’ Social Security Systems of the Entitlements of Non-active Intra-EU Migrants to Special Non-contributory Cash Benefits and Healthcare Granted on the Basis of Residence. Brussels: DG Employment and Social Affairs.Google Scholar
  14. Ferrera, Maurizio. 2005. The Boundaries of Welfare. European Integration and the new Spatial Politics of Social Protection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Ferrera, Maurizio. 2017a. “The Contentious Politics of Hospitality. Intra-EU Mobility and Social Rights.” European Law Journal 22 (6): 791-805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ferrera, Maurizio. 2017b. “The European Social Union: A Missing but Necessary ʽPolitical Goodʼ.” InA European Social Union after the Crisis, edited by Frank Vandenbroucke. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Ferrera, Maurizio. 2017c. “Impatient Politics and Social Investment: The EU as ʽPolicy Facilitatorʼ.” Journal of European Public Policy 24 (8): 1233-1251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ferrera, Maurizio, and Alessandro Pellegata. 2017. “Can Economic and Social Europe Be Reconciled? Citizen Views on Integration and Solidarity.” REScEU Mass Survey Report.
  19. Ferrera, Maurizio, and Carlo Burelli. Forthcoming 2019. “Cross-national Solidarity and Political Sustainability in the EU after the Crisis.” Journal of Common Market Studies 57 (1): 94-110.Google Scholar
  20. Gilpin, Robert. 1987. The Political Economy of International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Goodwin, Matthew J., and Oliver Heath. 2016. Brexit Vote Explained: Poverty, Low Skills and Lack of Opportunities. London: The Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
  22. Grande, Edgar, and Swen Hutter. 2016. Introduction: European Integration and the Challenge of Politicisation. In Politicising Europe. edited by Swen Hutter, Edgar Grande and Hanspeter Kriesi, 3-31. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Heclo, Hugh. 2010. Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden. From Relief to Income Maintenance. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
  24. Kriesi, Hanspeter, and Takis S. Pappas. 2016. European Populism in the Shadow of the Great Recession. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
  25. Mudde, Cas. 2007. Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Mudde, Cas. 2013. “Three Decades of Populist Radical Right Parties in Western Europe: So What?” European Journal of Political Research 52 (1): 1-19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mueller, Sean, and Soeren Keil. 2013. “The Territoriality of Fiscal Solidarity: Comparing Swiss Equalisation with European Union Structural Funding.” Perspectives on Federalism 5 (1): 123-148.Google Scholar
  28. Obinger, Herbert, Stephan Leibfried, and Frank. G. Castles. 2005. Federalism and the Welfare State: New World and European Experiences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Scharpf, Fritz. 2002. The European Social Model: Coping with the Challenges of Diversity. Cologne: Max Plank Institute, MPIfG Working Paper 02/8.Google Scholar
  30. Statham, Paul, and Hans-Jörg Trenz. 2013. “How European Union Politicization can Emerge through Contestation: The Constitution Case.” Journal of Common Market Studies. 51 (5): 965-980.Google Scholar
  31. Stjernø, Steinar. 2009. Solidarity in Europe. The History of an Idea, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Vandenbroucke, Frank. 2015. The Case for a European Social Union. From Muddling Through to a Sense of Common Purpose. In The Future of Welfare in a Global Europe, edited by Bernd Marin. 433-64. Ashgate: Aldershot UK.Google Scholar
  33. Vandenbroucke, Frank, Catherine Barnard, and Geert De Baere. 2017. A European Social Union after the Crisis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Università degli Studi di MilanoMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations