Advertisement

Eurozone crisis management and the changing nature of the democratic deficit in the European Union

  • Yannis PapadopoulosEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter first takes stock of the alarming findings on the dramatic decline of the quality and legitimacy of democracy, especially in countries of the Eurozone periphery. It further highlights the increasing democratic deficit in the European Union beyond the national level. It argues that improvements of the last decades in the alleviation of the democratic deficit have been annihilated by the management of the Eurozone crisis. Democratic choice has lost much of its meaning at the national level in the Eurozone periphery, and concomitantly, the preexisting democratic deficit of European integration has been aggravated with the politics of crisis management.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alonso, Sonia. 2014. “’You Can Vote but You Cannot Choose’: Democracy and the Sovereign Debt Crisis in the Eurozone.” IC3JM Working Paper 2014/282.Google Scholar
  2. Armingeon, Klaus, and Besir Ceka. 2014. “The Loss of Trust in the European Union During the Great Recession since 2007: The Role of Heuristics from the National Political System.” European Union Politics 15 (1): 82–107.Google Scholar
  3. Armingeon, Klaus, Kai Guthmann, and David Weisstanner. 2016. “How the Euro Divides the Union: The Effect of Economic Adjustment on Support for Democracy in Europe.” Socio-Economic Review 14 (1): 1–26.Google Scholar
  4. Bauer, Michael W., and Stefan Becker. 2014. “The Unexpected Winner of the Crisis: The European Commission’s Strengthened Role in Economic Governance.” Journal of European Integration 36 (3): 213–29.Google Scholar
  5. Bellamy, Richard, and Albert Weale. 2015. “Political Legitimacy and European Monetary Union: Contracts, Constitutionalism and the Normative Logic of Two-level Games.” Journal of European Public Policy 22 (2): 257–74.Google Scholar
  6. Bulmer, Simon, and William E. Patterson. 2014. “Germany as the EU’s Reluctant Hegemon? Of Economic Strength and Political Constraints.” Journal of European Public Policy 20 (10): 1387–405.Google Scholar
  7. Clements, Ben, Kyriaki Nanou, and Susannah Verney. 2014. “’We No Longer Love You, But We Don’t Want To Leave You’: The Eurozone Crisis and Popular Euroscepticism in Greece.” Journal of European Integration 36 (3): 247–65.Google Scholar
  8. Cordero, Guillermo, and Pablo Simon. 2016. “Economic Crisis and Support for Democracy in Europe.” West European Politics 39 (2): 305–25.Google Scholar
  9. Crum, Ben. 2018. “Parliamentary Accountability in Multilevel Governance: What Role for Parliaments in Postcrisis EU Economic Governance?” Journal of European Public Policy 25 (2): 268–86.Google Scholar
  10. Crum, Ben, and John Erik Fossum. 2013. Practices of Inter-Parliamentary Coordination in International Politics. The European Union and Beyond. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
  11. Curtin, Deirdre. 2014. “Challenging Executive Dominance in European Democracy.” The Modern Law Review 77 (1): 1–32.Google Scholar
  12. Dawson, Mark, and Floris de Witte. 2013. “Constitutional Balance in the EU after the Euro-Crisis.” The Modern Law Review 76 (5): 817–44.Google Scholar
  13. Dehousse, Renaud. 2016. “Why has EU Macroeconomic Governance Become more Supranational?” Journal of European Integration 38 (5): 617–31.Google Scholar
  14. Diessner, Sebastian. 2015. “Increasing the Transparency of the ECB Could Do More Harm than Good”. EUROPP (blog), Accessed April 7, 2019. http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2015/05/18/increasing-the-transparency-of-the-ecb-could-do-more-harm-than-good/.
  15. Dyson, Kenneth. 2013. “Sworn to Grim Necessity? Imperfections of European Economic Governance, Normative Political Theory, and Supreme Emergency.” Journal of European Integration 35 (3): 207–22.Google Scholar
  16. Fabbrini, Federico. 2016. Economic Governance in Europe. Comparative Paradoxes and Constitutional Challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Fabbrini, Sergio. 2013. “Intergovernmentalism and Its Limits: The Implications of the Euro Crisis on the European Union.” Comparative Political Studies 46 (9): 1003–29.Google Scholar
  18. Fabbrini, Sergio. 2016. “From Consensus to Domination: The Intergovernmental Union in a Crisis Situation.” Journal of European Integration 38 (5): 587–99.Google Scholar
  19. Featherstone, Kevin. 2016. “Conditionality, Democracy and Institutional Weakness: the Euro-crisis Trilemma.” Journal of Common Market Studies 54 (51): 48–64.Google Scholar
  20. Freire, Andre, Marco Lisi, Ioannis Andreadis, and José Manuel Leite Viegas. 2014. “Political Representation in Bailed-out Southern Europe: Greece and Portugal Compared.” South European Society and Politics 19 (4): 413–33.Google Scholar
  21. Grande, Edgar. 1996. “The State and Interest Groups in a Framework of Multi-Level Decision-Making: The Case of the European Union.” Journal of European Public Policy 3 (3): 318–38.Google Scholar
  22. Grimm, Dieter. 2015. “The Democratic Costs of Constitutionalization: The European Case.” European Law Journal 21 (4): 460–73.Google Scholar
  23. Habermas, Jürgen. 2015a. The Lure of Technocracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  24. Habermas, Jürgen. 2015b. “Democracy in Europe: Why the Development of the EU into a Transnational Democracy Is Necessary and How It Is Possible.” European Law Journal 21 (4): 546–57.Google Scholar
  25. Hix, Simon, and Björn Höyland. 2013. “Empowerment of the European Parliament.” Annual Review of Political Science 16:171–89.Google Scholar
  26. Högenauer, Anna-Lena, and David Howarth. 2016. “Unconventional Monetary Policies and the European Central Bank’s Problematic Democratic Legitimacy.” Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht 17 (2): 1–24.Google Scholar
  27. Hooghe, Liesbet, and Gary Marks. 2009. “A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus.” British Journal of Political Science 39 (1): 1–23.Google Scholar
  28. Joerges, Christian. 2016. “Integration through Law and the Crisis of Law in Europe’s Emergency.” In The End of the Eurocrats’ Dream. Adjusting to European Diversity, edited by Damian Chalmers, Markus Jachtenfuchs, and Christan Joerges, 299–338. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Kilpatrick, Claire. 2018. “Abnormal sources and institutional actions in the EU sovereign debt crisis: ECB crisis management and the sovereign debt loans.” In EU Legal Acts. Challenges and Transformations, edited by Marise Cremona and Claire Kilpatrick, 70–104. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Kriesi, Hanspeter, Edgar Grande, Martin Dolezal, Marc Helbling, Dominic Höglinger, Swen Hutter, and Bruno Wüest. 2012. Political Conflict in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Hutter, Swen, Hanspeter Kriesi, and Guillem Vidal. 2018. “Old versus New Politics: The Political spaces in Southern Europe in Times of Crisis.” Party Politics 24 (1): 10-22.Google Scholar
  32. Lacey, Joseph. 2017. Centripetal Democracy. Democratic Legitimacy and Political Identity in Belgium, Switzerland, and the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Majone, Giandomenico. 1998. “Europe’s Democratic Deficit: The Question of Standards.” European Law Journal 4 (1): 5–28.Google Scholar
  34. Majone, Giandomenico. 2014a. “From Regulatory State to a Democratic Default.” Journal of Common Market Studies 52 (6): 1216–23.Google Scholar
  35. Majone, Giandomenico. 2014b. Rethinking the Union of Europe Post-Crisis. Has Integration Gone Too Far? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Matthijs, Matthias. 2017. “Integration at What Price? The Erosion of National Democracy in the Euro Periphery.” Government and Opposition 52 (2): 266–94.Google Scholar
  37. Menéndez, Agustin José. 2013. “The Existential Crisis of the European Union.” German Law Journal 14 (5): 453– 526Google Scholar
  38. Mounck, Yasha. 2018. The People vs. Democracy. Why Our Freedom Is in Danger and How to Save It. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Novak, Stéphanie. 2013. “The Silence of Ministers. Consensus and Blame-Avoidance in the Council of the European Union.” Journal of Common Market Studies 51 (6): 1091–107.Google Scholar
  40. Offe, Claus. 2016. Europe Entrapped. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  41. Olsen, Johan P. 2010. Governing through Institution Building: Institutional Theory and Recent European Experiments in Democratic Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Papadopoulos, Yannis. 2005. “Implementing (and Radicalizing) art. I-47.4 of the Constitution: Is the Addition of Some (semi-) Direct Democracy to the Nascent Consociational European Federation just Swiss Folklore?” Journal of European Public Policy 12 (3): 448–67.Google Scholar
  43. Papadopoulos, Yannis. 2013. Democracy in Crisis? Politics, Governance and Policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  44. Puetter, Uwe. 2012. “Europe’s Deliberate Intergovernmentalism: The Role of the Council and the European Council in EU Economic Governance.” Journal of European Public Policy 19 (2): 161–78.Google Scholar
  45. Reh, Christine. 2014. “Is Informal Politics Undemocratic? Trilogues, Early Agreements and the Selection Model of Representation.” Journal of European Public Policy 21 (6): 822–41.Google Scholar
  46. Ruiz-Ruffino, Rubén and Sonia Alonso. 2017. “Democracy without choice: Citizens’ perceptions of government autonomy during the Eurozone crisis.” European Journal of Political Research 56 (2): 320–45.Google Scholar
  47. Sanchez-Cuenca, Ignacio. 2017. “From a Deficit of Democracy to a Technocratic Order: The Postcrisis Debate on Europe,” Annual Review of Political Science 20: 351–69.Google Scholar
  48. Savage, James D., and Amy Verdun. 2015. “Strengthening the European Commission’s budgetary and economic surveillance capacity since Greece and the euro area crisis: a study of five Directorates-General.” Journal of European Public Policy 23 (1): 101–18.Google Scholar
  49. Scharpf, Fritz W. 2011. “Monetary Union, Fiscal Crisis and the Preemption of Democracy.” Zeitschrift für Staatsund Europawissenschaft 9 (2):163–98.Google Scholar
  50. Scharpf, Fritz W. 2012. “Legitimacy Intermediation in the Multilevel European Polity and Its Collapse in the Euro Crisis.” MPIfG Discussion Paper 12/6.Google Scholar
  51. Scharpf, Fritz W. 2013. “Monetary Union, Fiscal Crisis and the Disabling of Democratic Accountability.” In Politics in the Age of Austerity, edited by Armin Schäfer and Wolfgang Streeck, 108–42. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  52. Scharpf, Fritz W. 2015. “After the Crash: A Perspective on Multilevel European Democracy.” European Law Journal 21 (3): 384–405.Google Scholar
  53. Scharpf, Fritz W. 2016. “De-constitutionalization and Majority Rule: A Democratic Vision for Europe.” MPIfG Discussion Paper 16/14.Google Scholar
  54. Schimmelfennig, Frank. 2015. “Liberal Intergovernmentalism and the Euro Area Crisis.” Journal of European Public Policy 22 (2): 177–95.Google Scholar
  55. Streeck, Wolfgang. 2014. “How Will Capitalism End.” New Left Review 87: 35–64.Google Scholar
  56. Teixeira, Conceicao Pequito, Emmanouil Tsatsanis, and Ana Maria Belchior. 2014. “Support for Democracy in Times of Crisis: Diffuse and Specific Regime Support in Portugal and Greece.” South European Society and Politics 19 (4): 501–18.Google Scholar
  57. Vibert, Frank. 2007. The Rise of the Unelected. Democracy and the New Separation of Powers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Weiler, Joseph H. H., Ulrich R. Haltern, and Franz C. Mayer. 1995. “European Democracy and its Critique.” West European Politics 18 (3): 4–39.Google Scholar
  59. White, Jonathan. 2015a. “Authority after Emergency Rule.” The Modern Law Review 78 (4): 585–610.Google Scholar
  60. White, Jonathan. 2015b. “Politicizing Europe: The Challenge of Executive Discretion.” In Democratic Politics in a European Union Under Stress, edited by Olaf Cramme and Sara B. Hobolt, 87–102. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Université de LausanneLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations