Advertisement

Social concertation in Europe during the Great Recession: A fsQCA-study of social partner involvement

  • Benedikt BenderEmail author
  • Bernhard Ebbinghausp
Chapter

Abstract

The Great Recession, following the financial market crash of 2008, has been a major challenge not only to governments dealing with the crisis but also for state-society relations between government and social partners across Europe. This chapter addresses the question of why some governments engage in tripartite social concertation between governments, employer organizations and trade unions as part of crisis management, while others choose to unilaterally pursue their agendas. Drawing on an extensive dataset of 29 European countries (EU-27 plus Norway and Switzerland), we use fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) to assess which factors can be identified as necessary or sufficient conditions for concertation efforts during the first five years since the crash. Specifically, the analysis studies whether economic pressure, governmental desire for political legitimacy, interest groups’ power resources, institutional context and corporatist legacy promote or prevent tripartite interest mediation. The main findings indicate that labour relations and political factors seem to dominate the overall pattern of including social partners in crisis management since 2008.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abbott, Andrew. 1988. “Transcending General Linear Reality.” Sociological Theory 6 (2): 169-186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Afonso, Alexandre. 2014. “How to Please Voters Without Alienating Friends? Parties, Organised Interests and Advocacy Coalitions in Swiss Immigration Policy.” Comparative European Politics 12 (6): 568–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Afonso, Alexandre. 2013. Social Concertation in Times of Austerity. European Integration and the Politics of Labour Market Reforms in Austria and Switzerland. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Afonso, Alexandre, and Yannis Papadopoulos. 2013. “Europeanization or Party Politics? Explaining Government Choice for Corporatist Concertation.” Governance 26 (1): 5-29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alvarez, R. Michael, Geoffrey Garrett, and Peter Lange. 1991. “Government Partisanship, Labor Organization, and Macroeconomic Performance.” American Political Science Review 85 (2): 539-56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Armingeon, Klaus. 1983. Neo-korporatistische Einkommenspolitik. Eine vergleichende Untersuchung von Einkommenspolitiken in westeuropäischen Ländern in den 70er Jahren. Frankfurt: Haag & Herchen.Google Scholar
  7. Armingeon, Klaus. 1986. “Formation and Stability of Neo-corporatist Incomes Policies: A Comparative Analysis.” European Sociological Review 2 (2): 138-47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Avdagic, Sabina. 2010. “When Are Concerted Reforms Feasible? Explaining the Emergence of Social Pacts in Western Europe.” Comparative Political Studies, 43 (5): 628-657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Avdagic, Sabina. 2011. “The Emergence of Social Pacts: Analysing Negotiation Process and Bargaining Outcomes.” In Social Pacts in Europe: Emergence, Evolution, and Institutionalization, edited by Sabina Avdagic, Martin Rhodes, and Jelle Visser, 45-60. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Avdagic, Sabina, Martin Rhodes, and Jelle Visser, eds. 2011. Social Pacts in Europe: Emergence, Evolution, and Institutionalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Baccaro, Lucio, and Marco Simoni. 2008. “Policy Concertation in Europe: Understanding Government Choice.” Comparative Political Studies 41 (10): 1323-1348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Baumgartner, Michael, and Alrik Thiem. 2017. “Often Trusted but Never (Properly) Tested: Evaluating Qualitative Comparative Analysis.” Sociological Methods & Research, online first, DOI  https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124117701487.
  13. Berg-Schlosser, Dirk, Gisèle de Meur, Charles Ragin, and Benoît Rihoux. 2008. “Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) as an Approach.” In Configurational Comparative Methods. Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques, edited by Benoît Rihoux and Charles Ragin, 1-18. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Berger, Stefan, and Hugh Compston, eds. 2002. Policy Concertation and Social Partnership in Western Europe: Lessons for the 21st Century. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  15. Culpepper, Pepper D., and Aidan Regan. 2014. “Why Don’t Governments Need Trade Unions Anymore? The Death of Social Pacts in Ireland and Italy.” Socio-Economic Review 12 (4): 723-45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Crouch, Colin. 1993. Industrial Relations and European State Traditions. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  17. CPDS. 2018. Comparative Political Data Set 1960-2016 (CPDS) by Klaus Armingeon, Virginia Wenger, Fiona Wiedemeier, Christian Isler, Laura Knöpfel, David Weisstanner, and Sarah Engler. Institute of Political Science, University of Berne, http://www.cpds-data.org/.
  18. Duşa, Adrian 2019. QCA with R: A Comprehensive Resource. Cham: Springer Nature.Google Scholar
  19. Ebbinghaus, Bernhard. 2010. “Reforming Bismarckian Corporatism: The Changing Role of Social Partnership in Continental Europe.” In A Goodbye to Bismarck? The Politics of Welfare Reforms in Continental Europe, edited by Bruno Palier, 255-278. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Ebbinghaus, Bernhard, and Jelle Visser. 2000. Trade Unions in Western Europe since 1945. London: Palgrave/Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1990. Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Eurofound 2012. Social Dialogue in Times of Global Economic Crisis. Irland: Dublin.Google Scholar
  23. Eurofound 2013. Industrial Relations and Working Conditions Developments in Europe 2012. Irland Dublin. Eurostat. Eurostat database, various statistics.Google Scholar
  24. Fajertag, Giuseppe, and Philippe Pochet, eds. 2000. Social Pacts in Europe: New Dynamics. Brussels: ETUI.Google Scholar
  25. Grote, Jürgen R., and Philippe C. Schmitter. 1999. “The Renaissance of National Corporatism: Unintended Sideeffect of European Economic and Monetary Union or Calculated Response to the Absence of European Social Policy?” Transfer 5 (1-2): 24-63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Guardiancich, Igor, and Oscar Molina, eds. 2017. Talking Through the Crisis: Social Dialogue and Industrial Relations Trends in Selected EU Countries. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
  27. Guyet, Rachel, David Tarren, and Claude-Emmanuel Triomphe. 2012. Social Dialogue in Times of Global Economic Crisis. Dublin: Eurofound.Google Scholar
  28. Hall, Peter A., and Daniel W. Gingerich. 2009. “Varieties of Capitalism and Institutional Complementarities in the Political Economy.” British Journal of Political Science 39 (3): 449-482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hall, Peter A., and David Soskice, eds. 2001. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Hassel, Anke. 2006. Wage Setting, Social Pacts and the Euro: A New Role for the State. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Hicks, Alexander. 1988. “Social Democratic Corporatism and Economic Growth.” Journal of Politics 50 (3): 677- 704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. ICTWSS Database, version 5.0. Amsterdam: Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Labour Studies (AIAS).http://www.uva-aias.net/en/ictwss.
  33. ILO. Various Years. ILOSTAT Database. http://www.ilo.org/ilostat.
  34. Jahn, Detlef. 2016. “Changing of the Guard: Trends in Corporatist Arrangements in 42 Highly Industrialized Societies from 1960 to 2010.” Socio-Economic Review 14 (1), 47–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jahn, Detlef. 2017. “Distribution Regimes and Redistribution Effects During Retrenchment and Crisis: A Cui Bono Analysis of Unemployment Replacement Rates of Various Income Categories in 31 Welfare States.” Journal of European Social Policy. Online first.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928717739249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kenworthy, Lane. 2003. “Quantitative Indicators of Corporatism: A Survey and Assessment.” International Journal of Sociology 33 (3): 10-40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Korpi, Walter. 1983. The Democratic Class Struggle. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  38. Lehmbruch, Gerhard. 1967. Proporzdemokratie. Politisches System und politische Kultur in der Schweiz und in Österreich. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr.Google Scholar
  39. Lehmbruch, Gerhard, and Schmitter, Philippe C., eds. 1982. Patterns of Corporatist Policy-Making. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  40. Lindstrom, Nicole 2015. “Wither Diversity of Post-Socialist Welfare Capitalist Cultures? Crisis and Change in Estonia and Slovenia.” European Journal of Sociology 56 (1): 119-139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. OECD. Various Years. Employment and Labour Market Statistics. Paris: OECD. http://Stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx.
  42. O’Donnell, Rory, Maura Adshead, and Damian Thomas. 2011. “Ireland: Two Trajectories of Institutionalization.” In Social Pacts in Europe, edited by Sabine Avdagic, Martin Rhodes and Jelle Visser, 89-119. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ragin, Charles C. 1987. The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  44. Ragin, Charles C. 2008a. Measurement Versus Calibration: A Set Theoretic Approach. In The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology, edited by Janet M. Box-Steffensmeier, Henry E. Brady and David Collier, 174- 198. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Ragin, Charles C. 2008b. Redesigning Social Inquiry. Fuzzy Sets and Beyond. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  46. Regan, Aidan. 2017. “Rethinking Social Pacts in Europe: Prime Ministerial Power in Ireland and Italy.” European Journal of Industrial Relations 23 (2): 117–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Regini, Marino. 2003. “Tripartite Concertation and Varieties of Capitalism.” European Journal of Industrial Relations 9 (3): 251-263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rhodes, Martin. 1997. Globalization, Labour Markets and Welfare States. A Future of ‘Competitive Corporatism’? Florence: European University Institute.Google Scholar
  49. Scharpf, Fritz W. 1991. Crisis and Choice in European Social Democracy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Schmitter, Philippe C. 1974. “Still the Century of Corporatism?” Revue of Politics 36 (1): 85-131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schmitter, Philippe C., and Gerhard Lehmbruch, eds. 1981. Trends Toward Corporatist Intermediation. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  52. Schmitter, Philippe C., and Wolfgang Streeck. 1999. “The Organization of Business Interests. Studying the Associative Action of Business in Advanced Industrial Societies.” MPIfG Discussion Paper 99 (1).Google Scholar
  53. Schneider, Carsten Q., and Claudius Wagemann. 2010. “Standards of Good Practice in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Fuzz-Sets.” Comparative Sociology 9 (3): 397-418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schneider, Carsten Q., and Claudius Wagemann. 2012. Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences. A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Siaroff, Alan. 1999. “Corporatism in 24 Industrial Democracies: Meaning and Measurement.” European Journal of Political Research 36 (2): 175-205.Google Scholar
  56. Thiem, Alrik. 2018. Advanced Functionality for Performing and Evaluating Qualitative Comparative Analysis. R Package Version 1.1-2.Google Scholar
  57. Traxler, Franz, Sabine Blaschke, and Bernhard Kittel. 2001. National Labour Relations in Internationalized Markets: A Comparative Study of Institutions, Change, and Performance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Vaughan-Whitehead, Daniel, ed. 2015. The European Social Model in Crisis: Is Europe Losing Its Soul? Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  59. Vaughan-Whitehead, Daniel, ed. 2018. Reducing Inequalities in Europe: How Industrial Relations and Labour Policies Can Close the Gap. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  60. Vis, Barbara. 2011. “Under Which Conditions Does Spending on Active Labor Market Policies Increase? An fsQCA Analysis of 53 Governments between 1985 and 2003.” European Political Science Review 3 (2): 229-252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Visser, Jelle. 1987. In Search of Inclusive Unionism. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universität MannheimMannheimGermany
  2. 2.University of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations