Advertisement

Exit oder Voice? Die Wahlbeteiligung politisch Unzufriedener

  • Anja HeidelbergerEmail author
  • Marlène Gerber
  • Marc Bühlmann
Chapter

Abstract

This contribution examines voter turnout among individuals dissatisfied with democracy. Specifically, we ask under which conditions dissatisfied citizens make use of their right to vote, and how this manifests itself in their voter preference. The results of our analysis of 21 European countries identify party affiliation as the most important determinant for the decision of dissatisfied individuals to participate in elections altogether. In general, a majority of displeased individuals does participate in elections, and hence do not express their alienation by abstaining from voting. However, we do not find any evidence that dissatisfied voters primarily vote for protest parties. Only when a protest party has already reached a respectable size are dissatisfied voters more likely to affiliate with them than with a classical opposition party – however, not significantly more likely than dissatisfied individuals with an affiliation to a government party. Our results thus support the conclusion that voter turnout of dissatisfied voters does not lead to the destabilization of the political system.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alber, Jens und Ulrich Kohler. 2007. “Die Ungleichheit der Wahlbeteiligung in Europa und den USA und die politische Integrationskraft des Sozialstaats.” Leviathan 35 (4): 510–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aldrich, John H. 1993. “Rational Choice and Turnout.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (1): 246-78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, Christopher J. und Christine Guillory. 1997. “Political Institutions and Satisfaction with Democracy: A Cross-National Analysis of Consensus and Majoritarian Systems.” American Political Science Review 91 (1): 66–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, Christopher J. und Silvia M. Mendes. 2005. “Learning to Lose: Election Outcomes, Democratic Experience and Political Protest Potential.” British Journal of Political Science 36 (1): 91–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Armingeon, Klaus. 1994. “Gründe und Folgen geringer Wahlbeteiligung.” Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 46 (1): 43–64.Google Scholar
  6. Armingeon, Klaus, Virginia Wenger, Fiona Wiedemeier, Christian Isler, Laura Knöpfel, David Weisstanner und Sarah Engler. 2018a. Comparative Political Data Set 1960-2016. Bern: Institute of Political Science, University of Berne.Google Scholar
  7. Armingeon, Klaus, Virginia Wenger, Fiona Wiedemeier, Christian Isler, Laura Knöpfel und David Weisstanner. 2018b. Supplement to the Comparative Political Data Set – Government Composition 1960-2016. Bern: Institute of Political Science, University of Berne.Google Scholar
  8. Bakker, Ryan, Erica Edwards, Liesbet Hooghe, Seth Jolly, Gary Marks, Jonathan Polk, Jan Rovny, Marco Steenbergen und Milada Vachudova. 2015. 2014 Chapel Hill Expert Survey. Version 2015.1. www.chesdata.eu. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina.
  9. Bélanger, Éric und Kees Aarts. 2006. “Explaining the Rise of the LPF: Issues, Discontent, and the 2002 Dutch Election.” Acta Politica 41 (1): 420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Betz, Hans-Georg. 1994. Radical Right-Wing Populism in Western Europe. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  11. Bühlmann, Marc. 2006. Politische Partizipation im kommunalen Kontext: Der Einfluss lokaler Kontexteigenschaften auf individuelles politisches Partizipationsverhalten. Bern: Haupt.Google Scholar
  12. Bühlmann, Marc. 2013. “Geringe Wahlbeteiligung als Gefahr für die Demokratie? Quantität, Egalität und Qualität elektoraler Partizipation in der Schweiz.” In Politische Partizipation: Idee und Wirklichkeit von der Antike bis in die Gegenwart, herausgegeben von Jürgen von Ungern-Sternberg und Hansjörg Reinau, 337–366. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  13. Bühlmann, Marc, Markus Freitag und Adrian Vatter. 2003. “Die schweigende Mehrheit: Eine Typologie der Schweizer Nichtwählerschaft.” In Schweizer Wahlen 1999: Swiss Electoral Studies, herausgegeben vonGoogle Scholar
  14. Pascal Sciarini, Sibylle Hardmeier und Adrian Vatter, 27–58. Bern, Stuttgart, Wien: Haupt.Google Scholar
  15. Crozier, Michael, Samuel P. Huntington und Joji Watanuki. 1975. The Crisis of Democracy: Report on the Governability of Democracies to the Trilateral Commission. New York: University Press.Google Scholar
  16. De Vries, Catherine E. und Sara B. Hobolt. 2012. “When Dimensions Collide: The Electoral Success of Issue Entrepreneurs.” European Union Politics 13 (2): 246–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Döring, Holger und Philip Manow. 2018. Parliaments and Governments Database (ParlGov): Information on Parties, Elections and Cabinets in Modern Democracies. Development version. www.parlgov.org.
  18. Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
  19. Easton, David. 1975. “A Re-Assessment of the Concept of Political Support.” British Journal of Political Science 5 (4): 435–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. European Social Survey. 2016. ESS Round 8 Data. Data file edition 2.1. NSD – Norwegian Centre for Research Data, Norway. Data Archive and distributor of ESS data for ESS ERIC.Google Scholar
  21. Feist, Ursula. 1994. Die Macht der Nichtwähler. Wie die Wähler den Volksparteien davonlaufen. München: Knaur.Google Scholar
  22. Fennema, Meindert. 2004. “Populist Parties of the Right.” In Movements of Exclusion: Radical Right-Wing Populism, herausgegeben von Jens Rydgren, 1–25. Dartmouth: Nova Scotia Publishers.Google Scholar
  23. Fuchs, Dieter und Hans-Dieter Klingemann. 1995. “Citizens and the State: A Changing Relationship?” In Citizens and the State, herausgegeben von Hans-Dieter Klingemann und Dieter Fuchs, 1–21. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Geissel, Brigitte. 2006. “Kritische Bürgerinnen und Bürger – eine Gefahr für Demokratien?” Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte 2006 (12): 3–9.Google Scholar
  25. Havlik, Vlastimil und Petr Voda. 2018. “Cleavages, Protest or Voting for Hope? The Rise of Centrist Populist Parties in the Czech Republic.” Swiss Political Science Review 24 (2): 161–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Heidelberger, Anja. 2018. Die Abstimmungsbeteiligung in der Schweiz. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  27. Hirschman, Albert O. 1970. Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations and States. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  28. IDEA, International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance. 2018. “Compulsory Voting.” Letzter Zugriff am 15. August 2018. https://www.idea.int/data-tools/data/voter-turnout/compulsory-voting.
  29. Ignazi, Piero. 1996. “The Crisis of Parties and the Rise of New Political Parties.” Party Politics 2 (4): 549–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jackman, Robert W. 1987. “Political Institutions and Voter Turnout in the Industrial Democracies.” American Political Science Review 81 (2): 405–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kang, Won-Taek. 2004. “Protest Voting and Abstention under Plurality Rule Elections.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 16 (1): 79–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Key, Valdimer. O. 1964. Politics, Parties & Pressure Groups. Binghamton: Vail-Ballou Press.Google Scholar
  33. Kitschelt, Herbert. 1988. “Left-Libertarian Parties: Explaining Innovation in Competitive Party Systems.” World Politics 40 (2): 194–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kitschelt, Herbert. 1995. The Radical Right in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  35. Kriesi, Hanspeter. 1999. “Movements of the Left, Movements of the Right: Putting the Mobilization of Two New Types of Social Movements into Political Context.” In Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism, herausgegeben von Herbert Kitschelt, Peter Lange, Gary Marks und John D. Stephens, 398–426. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Kriesi, Hanspeter. 2005. Direct Democratic Choice. Langham: Lexington.Google Scholar
  37. Kriesi, Hanspeter, Edgar Grande, Romain Lachat, Martin Dolezal, Simon Bornschier und Timotheos Frey. 2008. West European Politics in the Age of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Kuechler, Manfred. 1991. “The Dynamics of Mass Political Support in Western Europe: Methodological Problems and Preliminary Findings.” In Eurobarometer: The Dynamics of European Public Opinion, Essays in Honor of Jacques-René Rabier, herausgegeben von Karlheinz Reif und Ronald Inglehart, 275–293. New York: St. Martin’s.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1959. Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. Garden City: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  40. Lubbers, Marcel und Peer Scheepers. 2000. “Individual and Contextual Characteristics of the German Extreme Right Vote in the 1990s.” European Journal of Political Research 38 (1): 63–94.Google Scholar
  41. Lubbers, Marcel, Mérove Gijsberts und Peer Scheepers. 2002. “Extreme Right-Wing Voting in Western Europe.” European Journal of Political Research 41 (3): 345–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Merkel, Wolfgang und Daniel Bochsler, Karima Bousbah, Marc Bühlmann, Heiko Giebler, Miriam Hänni, Lea Heyne, Lisa Müller, Saskia Ruth, Bernhard Weßels. 2016. Democracy Barometer. Aarau: Zentrum für Demokratie.Google Scholar
  43. Miller, Arthur H. und Ola Listhaug. 1990. “Political Parties and Confidence in Government: A Comparison of Norway, Sweden and the United States.” British Journal of Political Science 20 (3): 357386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Milic, Thomas, Bianca Rousselot und Adrian Vatter. 2014. Handbuch der Abstimmungsforschung. Zürich: Verlag Neue Zürcher Zeitung.Google Scholar
  45. Mudde, Cas. 2007. Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Mudde, Cas und Joop van Holsteyn. 2000. “The Netherlands: Explaining the Limited Success of the Extreme Right.” In The Politics of the Extreme Right: From the Margins to the Mainstream, herausgegeben von Paul Hainsworth, 144–171. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  47. Müller-Rommel, Ferdinand. 1982. “Parteien neuen Typs in West-Europa: Eine vergleichende Analyse.” Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 13 (3): 369–390.Google Scholar
  48. Nassmacher, Hiltrud. 1989. “Auf- und Abstieg von Parteien: Ansätze zur vergleichenden Betrachtung von Etablierung und Niedergang von Parteien im Wettbewerb.” Zeitschrift für Politik 36 (2): 169–190.Google Scholar
  49. Niedermayer, Oskar. 2010. “Von der Zweiparteiendominanz zum Pluralismus: Die Entwicklung des deutschen Parteiensystems im westeuropäischen Vergleich.” Politische Vierteljahresschrift 51 (1): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Norris, Pippa. 1999. Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Passarelli, Gianluca und Dario Tuorto. 2018. “The Five Star Movement: Purely a Matter of Protest? The Rise of a New Party between Political Discontent and Reasoned Voting.” Party Politics 24 (2): 120–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Roth, Dieter. 1992. “Sinkende Wahlbeteiligung – eher Normalisierung als Krisensymptom.” In Protestwähler und Wahlverweigerer: Krise der Demokratie? herausgegeben von Karl Starzacher, Konrad Schacht, Bernd Friedrich und Thomas Leif, 58–68. Köln: Bund.Google Scholar
  53. Sabato, Larry. 1988. The Party’s Just Begun. Boston, Glenwood: Scott, Foresman.Google Scholar
  54. Schwarzbözl, Tobias und Matthias Fatke. 2016. “Außer Protesten nichts gewesen? Das politische Potenzial der AfD.” Politische Vierteljahresschrift 57 (2): 276–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Van der Brug, Wouter, Meindert Fennema und Jean Tillie. 2000. “Anti-Immigrant Parties in Europe: Ideological or Protest Vote?” European Journal of Political Research 37 (1): 77–102.Google Scholar
  56. Van der Eijk, Cees, Mark Franklin und Michael Marsh. 1996. “What Voters Teach us About European Elections: What European Elections Teach us About Voters.” Electoral Studies 15 (2): 149–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Verba, Sidney, Kay Lehman Schlozman und Henry E. Brady. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  58. World Bank. 2017. World Development Indicators 2017. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/26447

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anja Heidelberger
    • 1
    Email author
  • Marlène Gerber
    • 1
  • Marc Bühlmann
    • 1
  1. 1.Année Politique SuisseBernSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations