Advertisement

The dilemma between bilateral agreements and immigration control: How would Swiss voters decide?

  • Pascal SciariniEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter analyzes the dilemma that Swiss citizens face between the reintroduction of some form of immigration control and the continuation of the bilateral agreements with the European Union (EU). More specifically, the purpose of the chapter is to shed light on the sociodemographic and political characteristics of the pivotal group of voters who supported the initiative against mass immigration in 2014 but, when asked about the dilemma, say they would give priority to the continuation of the bilateral agreements over immigration control. To that end, I pool data from three different opinion surveys conducted in 2014, 2015 and 2016 and I estimate logistic regression models. The results highlight the importance of age, trust in government, left-right orientation, support to Swiss traditions and political interest as determinants of individual attitudes towards bilateral treaties and immigration control.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Armingeon, Klaus. 1998. “Es gibt sie doch, die Schweizer Wahlen!” In Schweizer Wahlen 1995, edited by Hanspeter Kriesi, Wolf Linder, and Ulrich Klöti, 273-295. Bern: Haupt.Google Scholar
  2. Armingeon, Klaus. 2000. “Ökonomische Erklärungen des Verhaltens bei aussenpolitischen Abstimungen: Eine Kritik der Analyse von Aymo Brunetti, Markus Jaggi und Rolf Weder.” Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Volkswirtschaft und Statistik 136 (2): 207-221.Google Scholar
  3. Armingeon, Klaus. 2003. Le Système de Partis de la Suisse en Comparaison Internationale. Une Étude à l’Appui des Résultats des Élections au Conseil National 1971-1999. Neuchâtel: Office fédéral de la statistique.Google Scholar
  4. Armingeon, Klaus, and Philipp Lutz. 2018. “Switzerland, the EU and the Initiative Against Mass Immigration. Elite Discourse and Reactions by Citizens.” Annual conference of the Swiss political science association, Geneva (unpublished paper)Google Scholar
  5. Dupont, Cédric, and Pascal Sciarini. 2001. “Switzerland and the European Integration Process: Engagement without Marriage.” West European Politics 24 (2): 211-232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dupont, Cédric, and Pascal Sciarini. 2007. “Back to the Future: The First Round of Bilateral Talks with the EU.” In Switzerland and the European Union: A Close, Contradictory and Misunderstood Relationship, edited by Clive Church, 202-214. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Kriesi, Hanspeter, Linder, Wolf, and Ulrich Klöti, eds. 1998. Schweizer Wahlen 1995.Google Scholar
  8. Bern: Haupt. Sciarini, Pascal, Alexandra Feddersen, and Simon Lanz. 2016. Analyse de la Votation Fédérale du 28 Février 2016. Genève/Berne: Université de Genève/gfs.bern.Google Scholar
  9. Sciarini, Pascal, Simon Lanz, and Alessandro Nai. 2015. “Till Immigration Do Us Part? Public Opinion and the Dilemma between Immigration Control and Bilateral Agreements.” Swiss Political Science Review 21 (2): 271-286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Sciarini, Pascal, Alessandro Naï, and Anke Tresch. 2014. Analyse de la Votation Fédérale du 9 Février 2014. Genève/Berne: Université de Genève/gfs.bern.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Université de GenèveGenevaSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations