Advertisement

Income inequality, status decline and support for the radical right

  • Sarah EnglerEmail author
  • David Weisstanner
Chapter

Abstract

Support for the radical right has risen in most Western democracies. Globalization and modernization processes are usually seen as the source of this development, reshaping political conflicts and producing new groups of people that feel ‘left behind’. However, few studies test how the relatively common trends in globalization shape the variation in the timing and extent of radical right support across countries. Focusing on the economic dimension of the ‘losers of globalization’ theory, we argue that income inequality is a suitable indicator to measure the extent to which some groups have fallen behind and to capture the fear of decline in material well-being of people not (yet) at the bottom of the income distribution. The relative deterioration in material conditions, we argue further, translates into a lower subjective social status of vulnerable groups who then turn towards the radical right. By cultivating nativism and thus providing non-economic criteria of social status, the radical right becomes more attractive as societies become more unequal. We show evidence for our hypothesis by comparing vote shares for radical right parties in 20 Western democracies between 1980 and 2016. The findings indicate that rising income inequality substantially increases support for the radical right in the long run. In addition, rising inequality translates into lower subjective social status of nontertiary educated men and this process of status decline further contributes to radical right support. Hence, there are both material and non-material linkages between income inequality and radical right support.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. Anderson, Christopher J., and Pablo Beramendi. 2008. “Income Inequality and Electoral Participation.” In Democracy, Inequality, and Representation. A Comparative Perspective, edited by Christopher J. Anderson and Pablo Beramendi. New York: Russel Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Armingeon, Klaus, and Besir Ceka. 2014. “The Loss of Trust in the European Union during the Great Recession since 2007: The Role of Heuristics form the National Political System.” European Union Politics 15 (1): 82–107.Google Scholar
  3. Armingeon, Klaus, and Kai Guthmann. 2014. “Democracy in Crisis? The Declining Support for National Democracy in European Countries, 2007-2011.” European Journal of Political Research 53 (3): 423–42.Google Scholar
  4. Armingeon, Klaus, Kai Guthmann, and David Weisstanner. 2016. “How the Euro Divides the Union: The Effect of Economic Adjustment on Support for Democracy in Europe.” Socio-Economic Review 14 (1): 1–26.Google Scholar
  5. Armingeon, Klaus, and Lisa Schädel. 2015. “Social Inequality in Political Participation: The Dark Sides of Individualisation.” West European Politics 38 (1): 1–27.Google Scholar
  6. Armingeon, Klaus, Virginia Wenger, Fiona Wiedemeier, Christian Isler, Laura Knöpfel, David Weisstanner, and Sarah Engler. 2018. Comparative Political Data Set 1960-2016. Bern: Institute of Political Science, University of Bern.Google Scholar
  7. Arzheimer, Kai. 2009. “Contextual Factors and the Extreme Right Vote in Western Europe, 1980–2002.” American Journal of Political Science 53 (2): 259–75.Google Scholar
  8. Autor, David H. 2014. “Skills, Education, and the Rise of Earnings Inequality Among the ‘Other 99 Percent’.” Science 344 (6186): 843–51.Google Scholar
  9. Beck, Nathaniel, and Jonathan N. Katz. 2011. “Modeling Dynamics in Time-Series–Cross-Section Political Economy Data.” Annual Review of Political Science 14 (1): 331–52.Google Scholar
  10. Bélanger, Eric, and Kees Aarts. 2006. “Explaining the Rise of the LPF: Issues, Discontent, and the 2002 Dutch Election.” Acta Politica 41 (1): 4–20.Google Scholar
  11. Bornschier, Simon. 2010. Cleavage Politics and the Populist Right: The New Cultural Conflict in Western Europe. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Bornschier, Simon. 2018. “Globalization, Cleavages, and the Radical Right.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Radical Right, edited by Jens Rydgren, 212–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Bradley, David, Evelyne Huber, Stephanie Moller, François Nielsen, and John D. Stephens. 2003. “Distribution and Redistribution in Postindustrial Democracies.” World Politics 55 (2): 193–228.Google Scholar
  14. Burgoon, Brian, Sam van Noort, Matthijs Rooduijn, and Geoffrey Underhill. 2018. “Radical Right Populism and the Role of Positional Deprivation and Inequality.” Economic Policy, Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  15. Coffé, Hilde, Bruno Heyndels, and Jan Vermeir. 2007. “Fertile Grounds for Extreme Right-Wing Parties: Explaining the Vlaams Blok’s Electoral Success.” Electoral Studies 26 (1): 142–55.Google Scholar
  16. De Boef, Suzanna, and Luke Keele. 2008. “Taking Time Seriously.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (1): 184–200.Google Scholar
  17. Gest, Justin, Tyler Reny, and Jeremy Mayer. 2017. “Roots of the Radical Right: Nostalgic Deprivation in the United States and Britain.” Comparative Political Studies 51 (13): 1694-1719Google Scholar
  18. Gidron, Noam, and Peter Hall. 2017a. “Populism as a Problem of Social Integration.” Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, Septemer 1, 2017. Google Scholar
  19. Gidron, Noam, and Peter Hall. 2017b. “The Politics of Social Status: Economic and Cultural Roots of Populist Right.” British Journal of Sociology 68 (1): 57–84.Google Scholar
  20. Grande, Edgar, and Hanspeter Kriesi. 2012. “The Transformative Power of Globalization and the Structure of Political Conflict in Western Europe.” In Political Conflict in Western Europe, edited by Hanspeter Kriesi, Edgar Grande, Martin Dolezal, Marc Helbling, Dominic Höglinger, Swen Hutter, and Bruno Wüest, 3–35. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Han, Kyung Joon. 2016. “Income Inequality and Voting for Radical Right-Wing Parties.” Electoral Studies 42: 54–64.Google Scholar
  22. Hanushek, Eric A., Guido Schwerdt, Simon Wiederhold, and Ludger Woessmann. 2015. “Returns to Skills Around the World: Evidence from PIAAC.” European Economic Review 73 (C): 103–30.Google Scholar
  23. Huber, Evelyne, and John D. Stephens. 2014. “Income Inequality and Redistribution in Post-Industrial Democracies: Demographic, Economic and Political Determinants.” Socio-Economic Review 12 (2): 245–67.Google Scholar
  24. Jesuit, David K., Piotr R. Paradowski, and Vincent A. Mahler. 2009. “Electoral Support for Extreme Right-Wing Parties: A Sub-National Analysis of Western European Elections.” Electoral Studies 28 (2): 279–90.Google Scholar
  25. Karreth, Johannes, Jonathan Polk, and Christopher S. Allen. 2012. “Catchall or Catch and Release? The Electoral Consequences of Social Democratic Parties’ March to the Middle in Western Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 46 (7):791- 822.Google Scholar
  26. Kitschelt, Herbert. 1992. “The Formation of Party Systems in East Central Europe.” Politics & Society 20 (1): 7–50.Google Scholar
  27. Kitschelt, Herbert. 1994. The Transformation of European Social Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Kitschelt, Herbert. 1995. The Radical Right in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  29. Kitschelt, Herbert. 2018. “Party Systems and Radical Right-Wing Parties.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Radical Right, edited by Jens Rydgren, 167–199. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  30. Kriesi, Hanspeter, Edgar Grande, Romain Lachat, Martin Dolezal, Simon Bornschier, and Timotheus Frey, eds. 2008. West European Politics in the Age of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Kriesi, Hanspeter, and Takis S. Pappas. 2015. European Populism in the Shadow of the Great Recession. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
  32. Lachat, Romain, and Martin Dolezal. 2008. “Demand Side: Dealignment and Realignment of the Structural Political Potentials.” In West European Politics in the Age of Globalization, edited by Hanspeter Kriesi, Edgar Grande, Romain Lachat, Martin Dolezal, Simon Bornschier, and Timotheus Frey, 237–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Mair, Peter. 1997. Party System Change: Approaches and Interpretations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. March, Luke, and Charlotte Rommerskirchen. 2015. “Out of Left Field? Explaining the Variable Electoral Success of European Radical Left Parties.” Party Politics 21 (1): 40–53.Google Scholar
  35. Marks, Gary, Carole J. Wilson, and Leonard Ray. 2002. “National Political Parties and European Integration.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (3): 585–94.Google Scholar
  36. Marx, Paul, and Christoph Nguyen. 2018. “Anti-Elite Parties and Political Inequality: How Challenges to the Political Mainstream Reduce Income Gaps in Internal Efficacy.” European Journal of Political Research 57 (4): 919-940Google Scholar
  37. Mousteri, Victoria, Michael Daly, and Liam Delaney. 2018. “The Scarring Effect of Unemployment on Psychological Well-Being across Europe.” Social Science Research 72: 146–69.Google Scholar
  38. Mudde, Cas. 2007. Populist Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Mudde, Cas, and Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser. 2018. “Studying Populism in Comparative Perspective: Reflections on the Contemporary and Future Research Agenda.” Comparative Political Studies 51 (13): 1667-1693.Google Scholar
  40. OECD. 2011. Divided We Stand. Why Inequality Keeps Rising. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  41. Oesch, Daniel. 2006a. “Coming to Grips with a Changing Class Structure. An Analysis of Employment Stratification in Britain, Germany, Sweden and Switzerland.” International Sociology 21 (2): 263–88.Google Scholar
  42. Oesch, Daniel. 2006b. Redrawing the Class Map: Stratification and Institutions in Britain, Germany, Sweden and Switzerland. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  43. Oesch, Daniel. 2008. “Explaining Workers’ Support for Right-Wing Populist Parties in Western Europe: Evidence from Austria, Belgium, France, Norway, and Switzerland.” International Political Science Review 29 (3): 349–73.Google Scholar
  44. Oesch, Daniel. 2013. Occupational Change in Europe. How Technology and Education Transform the Job Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Oesch, Daniel. 2015. “Occupational Structure and Labor Market Change in Western Europe since 1990.” In The Politics of Advanced Capitalism, edited by Pablo Beramendi, Silja Häusermann, Herbert Kitschelt, and Hanspeter Kriesi, 112–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Oesch, Daniel, and Line Rennwald. 2018. “Electoral competition in Europe’s new tripolar political space: Class voting for the left, centre-right and radical right.” European Journal of Political Research 57 (4): 783-807.Google Scholar
  47. Offe, Claus. 1991. “Capitalism by Democratic Design? Democratic Theory Facing the Triple Transition in East Central Europe.” Social Research 58 (4): 865–92.Google Scholar
  48. Plümper, Thomas, Vera E. Troeger, and Philip Manow. 2005. “Panel Data Analysis in Comparative Politics: Linking Method to Theory.” European Journal of Political Research 44 (2): 327–54.Google Scholar
  49. Pontusson, Jonas, and David Rueda. 2010. “The Politics of Inequality: Voter Mobilization and Left Parties in Advanced Industrial States.” Comparative Political Studies 43 (6): 675–705.Google Scholar
  50. Pontusson, Jonas, and David Weisstanner. 2018. “Macroeconomic Conditions, Inequality Shocks and the Politics of Redistribution, 1990–2013.” Journal of European Public Policy 25 (1): 31–58.Google Scholar
  51. Riphahn, Regina T. 2003. “Rational Poverty or Poor Rationality? The Take-up of Social Assistance Benefits.” Review of Income and Wealth 47 (3): 379–98.Google Scholar
  52. Rooduijn, Matthijs, and Brian Burgoon. 2017. “The Paradox of Well-being: Do Unfavorable Socioeconomic and Sociocultural Contexts Deepen or Dampen Radical Left and Right Voting Among the Less Well-Off?” Comparative Political Studies Online First.Google Scholar
  53. Runciman, Walter G. 1966. Relative Deprivation and Social Justice: A Study of Attitudes to Social Inequality in Twentieth-century England. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  54. Rydgren, Jens, ed. 2018. The Oxford Handbook of the Radical Right. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Scruggs, Lyle, Detlef Jahn, and Kati Kuitto. 2014. Comparative Welfare Entitlements Dataset 2. Version 2014-03: University of Connecticut & University of Greifswald.Google Scholar
  56. Solt, Frederick. 2008. “Economic Inequality and Democratic Political Engagement.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (1): 48–60.Google Scholar
  57. Solt, Frederick. 2016. “The Standardized World Income Inequality Database.” Social Science Quarterly 97 (5): 1267–81.Google Scholar
  58. Stubager, Rune. 2010. “The Development of the Education. Cleavage: Denmark as a Critical Case.” West European Politics 33 (3): 505–33.Google Scholar
  59. van der Brug, Wouter, Meindert Fennema, and Jean Tillie. 2000. “Anti-Immigrant Parties in Europe: Ideological or Protest Vote?” European Journal of Political Research 37 (1): 77–102.Google Scholar
  60. van der Brug, Wouter, Meindert Fennema, and Jean Tillie. 2005. “Why Some Anti-Immigrant Parties Fail and Others Succeed: A Two-Step Model of Aggregate Electoral Support.” Comparative Political Studies 38 (5): 537–573.Google Scholar
  61. van Heuvelen, Tom. 2018. “Within-Group Earnings Inequality in Cross-National Perspective.” European Sociological Review Online First: 1–18.Google Scholar
  62. van Oorschot, Wim. 2006. “Making the Difference in Social Europe: Deservingness Perceptions among Citizens of European Welfare States.” Journal of European Social Policy 16 (1): 23–42.Google Scholar
  63. Vlandas, Tim, and Daphne Halikiopoulou. 2018. “Does Unemployment Matter? Economic Insecurity, Labour Market Policies and the Far-right Vote in Europe.” European Political Science Online First.Google Scholar
  64. Weisstanner, David, and Klaus Armingeon. 2018. “How Redistributive Policies Reduce Market Inequality: Education Premiums in 22 OECD Countries.” Socio-Economic Review Online First.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwy018.
  65. Wulfgramm, Melike. 2014. “Life Satisfaction Effects of Unemployment in Europe: The Moderating Influence of Labour Market Policy.” Journal of European Social Policy 24 (3): 258–72.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universität ZürichBernSwitzerland
  2. 2.University of OxfordBernSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations