Advertisement

Social investment, active labour market policies and migration

  • Giuliano BonoliEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Over the last few years, social investment has been at the centre of the debate on how to deal with the crisis of the European social model. The notion of social investment is based on the idea that social problems can be dealt with and inequality can be counteracted by investing in the human capital of disadvantaged individuals and groups. Against this background, the objective of this contribution is to assess the adequacy of the social investment strategy in facing the challenges posed by a multicultural society, by looking at the example of active labour market policies. Relying on meta-analytical research, it shows that access biases to policy measures as well as labour market discrimination severely limit the potential of a social investment strategy to deal with the problem of mainlining social cohesion in increasingly diverse societies. The chapter concludes by arguing that social investment and particularly active labour market policies must be adapted to the emerging European multiethnic societies, otherwise they will fail to deliver on the promise of maintaining social cohesion.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abrassart, Aurélien, and Giuliano Bonoli. 2015. “Availability, Cost or Culture? Obstacles to Childcare Services for Low Income Families.” Journal of social policy 44 (4): 787-806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akerlof, George A. 1970. “Market for Lemons - Quality Uncertainty and Market Mechanism.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 84 (3): 488-500.Google Scholar
  3. Armingeon, Klaus. 2007. “Active Labour Market Policy, International Organizations and Domestic Politics.” Journal of European Public Policy 14 (6): 905-932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Armingeon, Klaus, and Giuliano Bonoli, eds. 2006. The Politics of Postindustrial Wefare States. Adapting Post-War Social Policies to New Social Risks. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Barbier, Jean-Claude. 2001. Welfare to Work Policies in Europe. The Current Challenges of Activation Policies. Paris: Centre d’études de l’emploi.Google Scholar
  6. Barbier, Jean-Claude. 2004. “Systems of Social Protection in Europe: Two Contrasted Paths to Activation, and maybe a Third.” In Labour and Employment Regulation in Europe, edited by Jens Lind, Herman Knudsen, and Henning Jørgensen, 233-254. Brussels: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  7. Barbier, Jean-Claude, and Wolfgang Ludwig-Mayerhofer. 2004. “Introduction: The Many Worlds of Activation.” European Societies 6 (4): 424-436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barrett, Alan, and Bertrand Maître. 2013. “Immigrant Welfare Receipt across Europe.” International Journal of Manpower 34 (1): 8-23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barrett, Alan, and Yvonne McCarthy. 2008. “Immigrants and Welfare Programmes: Exploring the Interactions between Immigrant Characteristics, Immigrant Welfare Dependence, and Welfare Policy.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 24 (3): 542-559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Becker, Gary S. (1971[1957]). The Economics of Discrimination. Chicago: Chicago University Press. Behaghel,Google Scholar
  11. Luc, Bruno Crépon, and Thomas Le Barbanchon. 2014. Unintended Effects of Anonymous Resumes. Bonn: IZA, DP No. 8517.Google Scholar
  12. Bernhard, Sarah, Hermann Gartner, and Gesine Stephan. 2008. Wage Subsidies for Needy Job-Seekers and Their Effect on Individual Labour Market Outcomes after the German Reforms. Nürnberg: IAB-Discussion Paper No. 21/2008.Google Scholar
  13. Bertrand, Marianne, and Esther Duflo. 2017. “Field Experiments on Discrimination.” In Handbook of Economic Field Experiments, edited by Abhijit V. Banerjee and Esther Duflo, 309-393. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
  14. Bonoli, Giuliano. 2010. “The Political Economy of Active Labour Market Policies.” Politics & Society 38 (4): 435-457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bonoli, Giuliano. 2013. The Origins of Active Social Policy. Active Labour Market Policy and Childcare in a Comparative Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Bonoli, Giuliano, Bea Cantillon, and Wim van Lancker. 2017. “Social Investment and the Matthew effect.” In The Uses of Social Investment, edited by Anton Hemerijck, 66-76. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Bonoli, Giuliano, and Fabienne Liechti. 2018. “Good Intentions and Matthew Effects: Access Biases in Participation in Active Labour Market Policies.” Journal of European Public Policy 25 (6): 894-911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Butschek, Sebastain, and Thomas Walter. 2014. “What Active Labour Market Programmes Work for Immigrants in Europe? A Meta-Analysis of the Evaluation Literature.” IZA Journal of Migration 3 (1).Google Scholar
  19. Cantillon, Bea. 2011. “The Paradox of the Social Investment State: Growth, Employment and Poverty in the Lisbon Era.” Journal of European Social Policy 21(5): 432-449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Clasen, Jochen. 2000. “Motives, Means and Opportunities: Reforming Unemployment Compensation in the 1990s.” In Recasting European Welfare States, edited by Mauriziio Ferrera and Martin Rhodes, 89-112. London: Frank Cass.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Clegg, Daniel. 2005. Activating the Multi-Tiered Welfare State: Social Governance, Welfare Politics and Unemployment Policies in France and the United Kingdom. Florence: European University Institute, PhD Thesis.Google Scholar
  22. Deleeck, Herman, J. Huybrechs, and Bea Cantillon. 1983. Het Mattüseffect. Antwerpen: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  23. Enjolras, Bernard, Jean Louis Laville, Laurent Fraisse, and Heather Trickey. 2001. “Between Subsidiarity and Social Assistance. The French Republican Route to Activation.” In An Offer You can’t Refuse: Workfare in International Perspective, edited by Ivar Lødemel and Heather Trickey, 71-104. Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
  24. Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 2009. The Incomplete Revolution. Adapting to Women’s New Roles. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  25. Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. ed. 2002. Why We Need a New Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Ferrera, Maurizio, Anton Hemerijck, and Martin Rhodes. 2000. The Future of Social Europe. Recasting Work and Welfare in the New Economy. Oeiras: Portuguese Ministry of Labour and Solidarity/Celta Editora.Google Scholar
  27. Filges, Trine, Geir Smedslund, Due Knudsen, and Anne-Marie K. Jørgensen. 2015. “Active Labour Market Programme Participation for Unemployment Insurance Recipients: A Systematic Review.” Campbell Systematic Reviews 2.Google Scholar
  28. Gal, John. 1998. “Formulating the Matthew Principle: On the Role of the Middle Classes in the Welfare State.” Scandinavian Journal of Social Welfare 7 (1): 42-55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Guryan, Jonathan, and Kerwin K. Charles. 2013. “Taste‐based or Statistical Discrimination: The Economics of Discrimination Returns to its Roots.” The Economic Journal 123 (572): F417-F432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Heckman, James J., and Jeffrey A. Smith. 2004. “The Determinants of Participation in a Social Program: Evidence from a Prototypical Job Training Program.” Journal of Labor Economics 22 (2): 243-298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hemerijck, Anton. 2012. Changing welfare states. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Hemerijck, Anton. 2017. “Social Investment and its Critics.” In The Uses of Social Investment, edited by Anton Hemerijck, 3-42. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Jenson, Jane. 2002. From Ford to Lego: Redesigning Welfare Regimes. Boston: Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
  34. Jenson, Jane. 2009. “Redesigning Citizenship Regimes after Neoliberalism. Moving Towards Social Investment.” In What future for social investment?, edited by Nathalie Morel, Bruno Palier, and Joakim Palme, 27-44. Stockholm: Institute for Future Studies.Google Scholar
  35. Jenson, Jane, and Denis Saint-Martin. 2006. “Building Blocks for a New Social Architecture: the LEGO (TM) Paradigm of an Active Society.” Policy and Politics 34 (3): 429-451.Google Scholar
  36. King, Desmond. 1995. Actively Seeking Work? The Politics of Unemployment and Welfare Policy in the United States and Great Britain. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  37. Krause, Annabelle, Ulf Rinne, and Klaus F. Zimmermann. 2012. “Anonymous Job Applications in Europe.” IZA Journal of European Labor Studies 1 (5).Google Scholar
  38. Le Grand, Julian. 1982. The Strategy of Equality: Redistribution and the Social Services. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  39. Marx, Ive. 2001. “Job Subsidies and Cuts in Employers’ Social Security Contributions: The Verdict of Empirical Evaluation Studies.” International Labour Review 140 (1): 69-83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nannestad, Peter. 2007. “Immigration and Welfare States: A Survey of 15 Years of Research.” European Journal of Political Economy 23 (2): 512-532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nolan, Brian. 2013. “What Use Is ‘Social Investment’?” Journal of European Social Policy 23 (5): 459-468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pavolini, Emmanuel, and Wim Van Lancker. 2018. “The Matthew Effect in Childcare Use: A Matter of Policies or Preferences?” Journal of European Public Policy 25 (6): 878-893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Peck, Jamie. 2001. Workfare States. New York: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
  44. Pierson, Paul. 2001. “Coping with Permanent Austerity: Welfare State Restructuring in Affluent Democracies.” In The New Politics of the Welfare State, edited by Paul Pierson, 410-456. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Quillian, Lincoln, Devah Pager, Ole Hexel, and Arnfinn H. Midtboen. 2017. “Meta-Analysis of Field Experiments Shows No Change in Racial Discrimination in Hiring Over Time.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 114 (41): 10870-10875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Saraceno, Chiara. 2017. “Family Relationships and Gender Equality in the Social Investment Discourse.” In The uses of social investment, edited by Anton Hemerijck, 59-65. Oxford: Oxford University press.Google Scholar
  47. Spence, Michael. 1973. “Job Market Signaling.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 87 (3): 355-374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Swenson, Peter A. 2002. Capitalists against Markets: The Making of Labor Markets and Welfare States in the United States and Sweden. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Torfing, Jacob. 1999. “Workfare with Welfare: Recent Reforms of the Danish Welfare State.” Journal of European social Policy 9 (1): 5-28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Van Lancker, Wim. 2013. “Putting the Child-Centered Strategy to the Test: Evidence for the EU 27.” European Journal of Social Security 15 (1): 4-27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Vandenbroucke, Frank, Anton Hemerijck, and Bruno Palier. 2011. The EU Needs a Social Investment Pact. Brussles: OSE, Opinion paper No. 5.Google Scholar
  52. Viebrock, Elke, and Jochen Clasen. 2009. “Flexicurity and Welfare Reform: A Review.” Socio-Economic Review 7 (2): 305-331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Welters, Riccardo, and Joan Muysken. 2006. “Employer Search and Employment Subsidies.” Applied Economics 38 (12): 1435-1448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zschirnt, Eva, and Didier Ruedin. 2016. “Ethnic Discrimination in Hiring Decisions: A Meta-Analysis of Correspondence Tests 1990–2015.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 42 (7): 1-19.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Université de LausanneLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations