Advertisement

Society Under Threat of Precarity of Employment

  • Vyacheslav BobkovEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Prekarisierung und soziale Entkopplung – transdisziplinäre Studien book series (PSETS)

Abstract

Precarity of employment is not only socio-economic consequence of global capitalism. It is also a threat to social and economic stability of live of population. The genesis of precarity of employment was rooted in destabilization of balance between capital and labour in the second half of XX century. As a result the whole human society was gradually transformed facing precarious conditions everywhere starting from labour markets to political and cultural spheres.

Keywords

Employment Socio-economic stability Global capitalism Precarity Capital&labour 

References

  1. Bauman, Z. (2005). Individualized society. Moscow: Logos.Google Scholar
  2. Beck, U. (2000). Brave new world of work. Cambridge: Malden: Blackwell Publishers; Polity Press.Google Scholar
  3. Blaug, M. (2004). Methodology of economic science or how do economists explain things. Moscow: NP “Journal of Problems of Economics”.Google Scholar
  4. Bobkov, V. (2017). Precarious employment in Russian Federation: Current Situation and Approaches to Reduction. In Precariy of employment: Global and Russian contexts of the future of work. Moscow: RealPrint.Google Scholar
  5. Bodei, R. (2010). The shared future or global uncertainty. International Letter, Milan, n. 106.Google Scholar
  6. Boltanksi, L., & Chiapello, E. (2011). New spirit of capitalism. Moscow: Novoye Literaturnoye Obozrenie.Google Scholar
  7. Brinkmann, U., Dörre, K., Rebenack, S. (2006). Prekäre Arbeit. Ursachen, Ausmaß, soziale Folgen und subjektive Verarbeitungsformen unsicherer Beschäftigungsverhältnisse (Precarious Work: Causes, Extent, Social Consequences and Subjective Coping with insecure employment). Bonn: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.Google Scholar
  8. De Sotto, J. U. (2007). Austrian Economic School: Market and business creativity. Chelyabinsk: Socium.Google Scholar
  9. Degryse, C. (2017). Shaping the world of work in the digital economy. ETUI, Foresight Unit, Brussels, 1. January.Google Scholar
  10. Durkheim, E. (2006). Sociology. Moscow: Kanon.Google Scholar
  11. Eichhorst, W., & Tobsch, V. (2017). Risk of precariousness: Results from European Working Conditions Survey 2010 and 2015. Brussels: Economy and Scientific Policy European Parliament. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2017/602025/IPOL_BRI(2017)602025_EN.pdf. Accessed 5 Oct 2018.
  12. Grimshaw, D., Johnson, M., Rubery, J., & Keizer A. (2016). Reducing Precarious Work Protective gaps and the role of social dialogue in Europe. UK European Work and Employment Research Centre, University of Manchester. http://www.research.mbs.ac.uk/ewerc/Portals/0/Documents/Comparative-Report-Reducing-Precarious-Work-v2.pdf. Accessed 5 Oct 2018.
  13. Hepp, R. (2017). Precarious conditions rooted in society. In V. Bobkov (Ed.), Precariy of employment: Global and Russian contexts of the future of work. Moscow: RealPrint.Google Scholar
  14. ILO. (2012a). From precarious work to decent work: outcome document to the workers’ symposium on policies and regulations to combat precarious employment/International Labour Office, Bureau for Workers’ Activities. Geneva: ILO. http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/—ed_dialogue/—actrav/documents/meetingdocument/wcms_179787.pdf. Accessed 5 Oct 2018.
  15. ILO. (2012b). Decent work indicators: concepts and definitions: ILO manual/International Labour Office (1st edn.) Geneva: ILO. http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/—dgreports/—stat/documents/publication/wcms_183859.pdf. Accessed 5 Oct 2018.
  16. ILO. (2015). The future of work centenary initiative. Report of Director General. In International labour conference 104th session.Google Scholar
  17. Jencks, C., & Peterson, P. (1991). The urban underclass. Washington DC: Brookings.Google Scholar
  18. Kalleberg, A. (2009). Precarious work, insecure workers: Employment relations in transition. American Sociological Review, 74, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ricceri, M., (2017). Value of labour in the context of digital economy. In: Precariy of employment: global and Russian contexts of the future of work. Moscow: RealPrint.Google Scholar
  20. Sennett, R. (1998). The corrosion of character—The personal consequences of work in the new capitalism. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  21. Sennett, R. (2006). The culture of the new capitalism. Bologna: Odoya.Google Scholar
  22. Shkaratan, O., Karacharovskiy, V., & Gasyukova, E. (2015). Precariat: Theory and empiric analysis (a case study of Russia. 1994–2013) [Шкapaтaн O.E., Кapaчapoвcкий B.B., Гacюкoвa E.H. Пpeкapиaт тeopия и эмпиpичecкий aнaлиз (нa мaтepиaлax oпpocoв в Poccии, 1994-2013)]; Socis, № 12.Google Scholar
  23. Standing, G. (2014). Precariat: New dangerous class. Moscow: Ad Marginem.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Toschenko, J. (2015). Precariat – New Social Class. [Toщeнкo Ж.T. Пpeкapиaт – нoвый coциaльный клacc]Socis, № 6.Google Scholar
  25. Vosko, L. (2006). Precarious employment: Towards an improved understanding of labour market insecurity. In Precarious employment: Understanding of labour market insecurity in Canada. London, Ithaca: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Russian University of EconomicsMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations