Advertisement

OEM oder Serviceanbieter?

Wie Toyota mit e-Palette die Automobilindustrie revolutioniert
  • Katharina HölckEmail author
  • Sebastian Höflich
  • Jan Wehinger
Chapter

Zusammenfassung

Unser Alltag ist ein wiederkehrendes Wechselspiel zwischen Tätigkeiten, die an einem bestimmten Ort erbracht werden müssen oder möchten, und Mobilität, d. h. das Erreichen dieser Tätigkeitsstätten. Im digitalen Automobilzeitalter kann dieses Wechselspiel neu organisiert werden. Dieses Potential hat auch Toyota frühzeitig erkannt. Der Automobilhersteller stellte auf der CES 2018 die Vision „e-Palette“ vor, ein revolutionäres Plattformsystem für autonome Mobilitätslösungen in Partnerschaft mit den Technologiegiganten Amazon, Microsoft und Uber.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Ballon, P. (2009). Control and value in mobile communications. A political economy of the reconfiguration of business models in the European mobile industry (PhD Theses, VUB, Bussels, Belgium).Google Scholar
  2. Bauer, J. M. (2014). The evolution of the European regulatory framework for electronic communication. IBEI working papers Telefonica chair series.Google Scholar
  3. Caillaud, B. & Jullien, B. (2003). Chicken, & Egg: Competition among intermediation service providers. RAND Journal of Economics, 34, 309–328.Google Scholar
  4. Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. (2007). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Cusumano, M. A. & Gawer, A. (2002). The elements of platform leadership. MIT Sloan Management Review.Google Scholar
  6. Eisenmann, T. R., Parker, G. G., & Van Alstyne, M. W. (2009). Opening platforms: How, when and why? In A. Gawer (Ed.), Platforms, Markets, and Innovation (pp. 131–164). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  7. Eisenmann, T. R., Parker, G. G., & Van Alstyne, M. W. (2011). Platform envelopment. Strategic Management Journal, 32(12), 1270–1285.Google Scholar
  8. Evans, D. S. & Schmalensee, R. (2007). Industrial organization of markets with two-sided platforms. Competition Policy International, 3(1), 151–179.Google Scholar
  9. Hagiu, A. (2007). Merchant or two-sided platform? Review of Network Economics, 6(2), 115–133.Google Scholar
  10. Hagiu, A. (2009). Two-Sided Platforms: Product Variety and Pricing Structures. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 18(4), 1011–1043.Google Scholar
  11. Hagiu, A. (2012). Software Platforms. In M. Peitz & J. Waldfogel (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the digital economy (pp. 59–82). Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hagiu, A. & Jullien, B. [Bruno]. (2014). Search diversion and platform competition. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 33, 48–60.Google Scholar
  13. Hagiu, A. & Wright, J. (2015). Multi-sided platforms. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 43, 162–174. RGoogle Scholar
  14. Hölck, K. (2016). Beyond the Single Platform: An Assessment of the Functioning and Regulatory Challenges of Multi-Layered Platform Systems in the Media and Communications Sector. PhD Dissertation, Vrije Universität Brussel.Google Scholar
  15. Hölck, K., Cremer, S., & Ballon, P. (2016). Cross-platform effects: Towards a measure for platform integration benefit. 4th annual open and user innovation conference (OUI). Harvard Business School, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  16. Armstrong, M. (2006). Competition in two-sided markets. The RAND Journal of Economics, 37(3), 668–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rochet, J.-C. & Tirole, J. (2003). Platform competition in two-sided markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(4), 990–1029.Google Scholar
  18. Rochet, J.-C. & Tirole, J. (2006). Two-sided markets: A progress report. RAND Journal of Economics, 37(3), 645–667.Google Scholar
  19. Parker, G. G. & Van Alstyne, M. W. (2005). Two-Sided Network Effects: A Theory of Information Product Design. Management Science, 51(10), 1494–1504.Google Scholar
  20. Parker, G. G., Van Alstyne, M. W., & Choudary, S. P. (2016). Platform revolution: How networked markets are transforming the economy and how to make them work for you. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  21. Roson, R. (2005). Two-sided markets: A tentative survey. Review of Network Economics, 4(2), 142–160.Google Scholar
  22. Schlesinger, P. & Doyle, G. (2015). From organizational crisis to multi-platform salvation? Creative destruction and the recomposition of news media. Journalism, 16(3), 305–323.Google Scholar
  23. Spengler, J. J. (1950). Vertical integration and antitrust policy. The Journal of Political Economy, 58(4), 347–352. JSTOR:  https://doi.org/10.2307/1828887
  24. Treacy, M. & Wiersema, F. (1993). Costumer intimacy and other value disciplines. Havard Business Review, 71(1), 84–94.Google Scholar
  25. Van Maanen, J. (1988). Tales of the Field. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Weyl, E. G. (2008). Double marginalisation in two-sided markets. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1324412
  27. Yin, R. K. (2012). Applications of Case Study Research (3rd Ed.). Los Angeles, London, New Delhi: SAGE.Google Scholar
  28. Yin, R. K. (2014). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (5th Ed.). Los Angeles, London, New Delhi: SAGE.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katharina Hölck
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sebastian Höflich
    • 1
  • Jan Wehinger
    • 1
  1. 1.MHP Management- und IT-Beratung GmbHMunichDeutschland

Personalised recommendations