Advertisement

The Phenomenon of Touch: A Trinitarian Reduction

  • Fernando MurilloEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Phänomenologische Erziehungswissenschaft book series (PHE, volume 8)

Schlüsselwörter

Phänomenologie Berühren Eros Bildung Phänomenologische Reduktion Psychoanalyse 

Abstract

In this chapter, I posit the erotic and the body in close relation to the universality of touch, in an attempt to show their proximity in formative experience. To do this, I work through an essay by Ignacio Martín-Baró called “La Psicología de la Caricia” [the psychology of a caress] (1970). As Martín-Baró compellingly shows, there is a subtle dialectic through which touch and the human being shape each other. In discussing the phenomenality of this dialectic in touch, I draw both from the phenomenological tradition represented in the lineage of Husserl, Heidegger, and Marion, as well as from psychoanalytic theory. Methodologically, the study is organized in three moments of phenomenological reductions, operationalizing a “trinitarian lens”. The chapter then offers a discussion on the Freudian perspective on the drives, as lending an understanding of the phenomenality of touch by positing Eros as “the ultimate cause of all activity”, particularly including educational activity.

Keywords

Phenomenology Touch Eros Formation Phenomenological reduction Psychoanalysis 

References

  1. Brinkmann, M., and S. S. Rödel. 2018. Pädagogisch-phänomenologische Videographie. Zeigen, Aufmerken, Interattentionalität. In Handbuch qualitativer Videoanalyse. Method(olog)ische Herausforderungen – forschungspraktische Perspektiven, eds. C. Moritz and M. Corsten. 521–547, Wiesbaden: Springer VS.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Britzman, Deborah. 2010. Freud and Education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Freud, Sigmund. 1949. An Outline of Psychoanalysis. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  4. Kenklies, Karsten (in press). Minima Educationum, or: Can there be a Post-Human/ist Education?Google Scholar
  5. Lacan, Jacques. 2006. Écrits. New York: Norton & Company, Inc.Google Scholar
  6. Marion, J. L. 2002. Being Given: Toward a Phenomenology of Giveness. Standford University.Google Scholar
  7. Marion, Jean-Luc. 2003. The Event, the Phenomenon, and the Revealed. In Transcendence in philosophy and religion, ed. James Faulconer, 87–105. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Martín Baró, Ignacio. 1970. La Psicología de la Caricia. ECA 25, 264: 496–498.Google Scholar
  9. Musil, Robert. 2013. The Confusions of Young Master Torless. Alma Classics.Google Scholar
  10. Pinar, William. 2006. Literary Study as Educational Research: “more than a pungent school story”. In Doing Educational Research, eds. K. Tobin and Joe L. Kincheloe. 347–377, Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  11. Plato. 1951. The Symposium. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  12. Rocha, Sam. 2015. Folk Phenomenology: Education, Study and the Human Person. Eugene (OR): Pickwick Publications.Google Scholar
  13. Wyneken, Gustav. 1921. Eros. Lauenburg: Adolf Saal. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations