Advertisement

Image-Based Detection of MRI Hardware Failures

  • Bhavya JainEmail author
  • Nadine Kuhnert
  • André deOliveira
  • Andreas Maier
Conference paper
Part of the Informatik aktuell book series (INFORMAT)

Zusammenfassung

Currently in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) systems, most hardware failures are only detected after a component has stopped functioning properly. In many cases, this results in a downtime of the system. Moreover, sometimes defective parts are not identified correctly, which may result in more parts than necessary being replaced, causing extra costs. Often in MRI systems, hardware related problems have an impact on image quality. Given an imaging protocol and a well-functioning MRI system, certain image quality metrics have a normal range in a given patient population. Thus, such metrics will present a measurable behavior change in case of a hardware problem. We identified such simple and powerful metrics for signal-to-noise ratio, noise variance and symmetry in images for hardware failures related to Shimming and Local RF coils in this work. To be able to calculate these metrics with every MRI image during the clinical workflow, another constraint is the computation time. With the performance of quality metrics on machine learning algorithms and computation time, we are able to identify the failing MRI components with an accuracy of up to 0.96 AUROC.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. 1.
    Kuhnert N, Lindenmayr O, Maier A. Classification of body regions based on MRI log files. Proc CORES. 2017; p. 102–109.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lorch B, Vaillant G, Baumgartner C, et al. Automated detection of motion artefacts in MR imaging using decision forests. J Med Eng. 2017;2017(4501647):1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Peltonen JI, Mäkelä T, Salli E. MRI quality assurance based on 3D FLAIR brain images. Magn Reson Mater Phys Biol Med. 2018;.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Immerkaer J. Fast noise variance estimation. Comput Vis Image Underst. 1996;64(2):300 – 302.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mehan WA, González RG, Buchbinder BR, et al. Optimal brain MRI protocol for new neurological complaint. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(10):e110803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bhavya Jain
    • 1
    Email author
  • Nadine Kuhnert
    • 1
    • 2
  • André deOliveira
    • 1
  • Andreas Maier
    • 2
  1. 1.Siemens HealthineersErlangenDeutschland
  2. 2.Fakultät für Pattern RecognitionFAU Erlangen-NürnbergNürnbergDeutschland

Personalised recommendations