Advertisement

Selbstlimitierung im Automatenspiel – ein Überblick

  • Tanja StrohäkerEmail author
Chapter

Zusammenfassung

Die Selbstlimitierung stellt als Methode zur Selbstregulierung eine wichtige Möglichkeit des Spielerschutzes dar. Dieser Beitrag bietet eine Übersicht zu Limits generell und ihrer Anwendung im Automatenspiel im Speziellen. Die Evaluation bereits etablierter Programme deutet darauf hin, dass Limits ein geeignetes Mittel zur Schadensminimierung darstellen.

Schlüsselwörter

Automatenspiel Spielerschutz Selbstlimitierung Selbstregulierung Schadensminimierung 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Becker, T. (2012). Regulierung durch Spielhallengesetze. Stuttgart: Vortrag auf dem Workshop „Spielhallen und Regulierung“ der Universität Hohenheim. Abgerufen von https://gluecksspiel.unihohenheim.de/fileadmin/einrichtungen/gluecksspiel/Workshop/Vortrag_Becker.pdf
  2. Bernhard, B. J., Lucas, A., Jang, D., & Kim, J. (2006). Responsible Gaming Device Research Report, 1–56.Google Scholar
  3. Blaszczynski, A., Ladouceur, R., & Moodie, C. (2008). The Sydney Laval Universities Gambling Screen: Preliminary data. Addiction Research and Theory, 16(4), 401–411.  https://doi.org/10.1080/16066350701699031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blaszczynski, A., Parke, A., Parke, J., & Rigbye, J. (2014). Facilitating Player Control in Gambling. The Journal of Gambling Business and Economics, 8(3), 36–51.Google Scholar
  5. Blaszczynski, A., Sharpe, L., Walker, M., Shannon, K., & Coughlan, M.-J. (2005). Structural Characteristics of Electronic Gaming Machines and Satisfaction of Play Among Recreational and Problem Gamblers. International Gambling Studies, 5(2), 187–198.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14459790500303378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bundesministerium für Finanzen. (2014). Zweiter Bericht an den Nationalrat über eine betreiberunabhängige Spielerkarte. Abgerufen von https://www.parlament.gv.at/PAKT/VHG/XXV/III/III_00132/fname_380246.pdf
  7. Delfabbro, P. H. (2012). Evaluation of the Maxetag Budget [Limit] Setting Feature. Report prepared for the Responsible Gambling Working Party.Google Scholar
  8. Delfabbro, P. H., & Winefield, A. H. (1999). Poker-machine gambling: An analysis of within session characteristics. British Journal of Psychology, 90(3), 425–439.  https://doi.org/10.1348/000712699161503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dowling, N., Smith, D., & Thomas, T. (2005). Electronic gaming machines: are they the ‘crackcocaine’ of gambling? Addiction, 100(1), 33–45.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.00962.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Focal Research. (2010). Evaluating the Impact of the “ MyPlay ” System in Nova Scotia: Phase 1: Regular VL Benchmark Survey. Abgerufen von https://www.focalresearch.com/sites/default/files/publications/Technical Report Phase 1 My-Play Benchmark Final _Focal_ Jan 282011_0.pdf
  11. Gainsbury, S. (2011). Player account-based gambling: Potentials for behaviour-based research methodologies. International Gambling Studies, 11(2), 153–171.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14459795.2011.571217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Griffiths, M. D., Wood, R. T. A., & Parke, J. (2009). Social Responsibility Tools in Online Gambling: A Survey of Attitudes and Behavior among Internet Gamblers. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(4), 413–421.  https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2009.0062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gupta, R., & Derevensky, J. L. (2004). A Treatment Approach for Adolescents with Gambling Problems. In J. L. Derevensky & R. Gupta (Eds.), Gambling Problems in Youth: Theoretical and Applied Perspectives. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
  14. Hoffmann, B. H. (2012). The Norwegian story - with a happy ending? Talk prepared for: Discovery 2012, Responsible Gambling Council.Google Scholar
  15. Hoffmann, B. H. (2014). Norsk Tippings Responsible Gambling Platform. Helsinki: 10th European Conference on Gambling Studies and Policy Issues.Google Scholar
  16. Kim, H. S., Wohl, M. J. A., Stewart, M. J., Sztainert, T., & Gainsbury, S. M. (2014). Limit your time, gamble responsibly: Setting a time limit (via pop-up message) on an electronic gaming machine reduces time on device. International Gambling Studies, 14(2), 266–278.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14459795.2014.910244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ladouceur, R., Blaszczynski, A., & Lalande, D. R. (2012). Pre-commitment in gambling: A review of the empirical evidence. International Gambling Studies, 12(2), 215–230.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14459795.2012.658078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lalande, D. R., & Ladouceur, R. (2011). Can cybernetics inspire gambling research? A limit-based conceptualization of self-control. International Gambling Studies, 11(2), 237–252.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14459795.2011.598540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Livingstone, C., Rintoul, A., & Francis, L. (2014). What is the evidence for harm minimisation measures in gambling venues? Evidence Base, 2014(2), 1–24.  https://doi.org/10.21307/eb-2014-002
  20. McDonnell-Phillips Pty Ltd. (2006). Analysis of gambler precommitment behaviour. Report prepared for Gambling Research Australia. Abgerufen von http://jogoexcessivo.jogoremoto.pt/wpcontent/uploads/2012/08/Analysis-of-Gambler-Pre-commitment-Behaviour-2006-PDF.pdf
  21. Nower, L., & Blaszczynski, A. (2010). Gambling Motivations, Money-Limiting Strategies, and Precommitment Preferences of Problem Versus Non-Problem Gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26(3), 361–372.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-009-9170-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Polatschek, A., Wadden, L., & Gwynn, M. (2013). My- Play : Nova Scotia ’ s Experience with a Responsible Gambling System for VLT ’ s. Paper presented at the National Association of Gambling Studies, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
  23. Productivity Commission. (2010). Gambling, Report No. 50 (Vol. 1). Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
  24. Puhm, A., & Uhl, A. (2016). Novelle des Glücksspielgesetzes 2010: Evaluation der Umsetzung im Bereich Spielerschutz. Wien: Gesundheit Österreich GmbH. Abgerufen von https://www.bmf.gv.at/steuern/gluecksspiel-spielerschutz/inoesterreich/Studie_zur_Evaluation_der_GSpG_Novelle_2010_Spielerschutz_3.pdf?67ry6d
  25. Rintoul, A., & Thomas, A. (2017). Pre-commitment systems for electronic gambling machines Preventing harm and improving consumer protection. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies (AIFS). Abgerufen von http://apo.org.au/system/files/105516/apo-nid105516-425136.pdf
  26. Schottler Consulting. (2006). Factors that Influence Gambler Adherence to Pre-Commitment Decisions. Report prepared for Gambling Research Australia.Google Scholar
  27. Schottler Consulting. (2016). An exploratory study examining pre-commitment in New Zealand. Report prepared for the New Zealand Ministry of Health.Google Scholar
  28. Svenska Spel. (2015). Gaming shall be enjoyed by all ! Annual Report 2015. Abgerufen von https://om.svenskaspel.se/AnnualReport/2015/eng/pdf/SvenskaSpel_AR2015_ENG.pdf
  29. Thomas, A., Rintoul, A., Deblaquiere, J., Armstrong, A., Thomas, A., Rintoul, A., Christensen, D. (2016). Review of electronic gaming machine pre-commitment features - Limit Setting. Melbourne: Australian Insitute of Family Studies (AIFS). Abgerufen von https://aifs.gov.au/agrc/sites/default/files/publication-documents/agrc-precommitment-transaction-history
  30. Williams, R. J. (2010). Pre-Commitment As a Strategy for Minimizing Gambling-Related Harm. Edmonton: Alberta Gaming Research Institute. Abgerufen von https://www.uleth.ca/dspace/handle/10133/1287
  31. Williams, R. J., West, B. L., & Simpson, R. I. (2012). Prevention of Problem Gambling: A Comprehensive Review of the Evidence, and Identified Best Practices. Report prepared for the Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre and the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-009-9141-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wood, R. T. A., & Griffiths, M. D. (2010). Social responsibility in online gambling : voluntary limit setting. World Online Gambling Law Report, 9(11), 10–11.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fachgebiet Agrarmärkte und Agrarmarketing (420B)Universität HohenheimStuttgartDeutschland

Personalised recommendations