Advertisement

Technology-supported classrooms: New opportunities for communication and development of mathematical understanding

  • Lynda BallEmail author
  • Kaye Stacey
Chapter

Zusammenfassung

This chapter provides an overview of some themes which have emerged over two decades of Bärbel Barzel’s work related to the teaching and learning of school mathematics with technology. The themes which are discussed include technology supporting mathematical communication, technology supporting cognitive activities and technology supporting an open classroom. Overall, the focus is on the potential for technology-supported classrooms to promote students’ understanding in secondary school mathematics. Four papers are used to illustrate Barzel’s contribution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Arcavi, A. (1994). Symbol sense: Informal sense-making in formal mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(3), 24–35.Google Scholar
  2. Artigue, M. (2002). Learning mathematics in a CAS environment: The genesis of a reflection about instrumentation and the dialectics between technical and conceptual work. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 7(3), 245–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ball, L., & Barzel, B. (2018). Communication when learning and teaching mathematics with technology. In L. Ball, P. Drijvers, S. Ladel, H.-S. Siller, M. Tabach, & C. Vale (Eds.), Uses of Technology in Primary and Secondary Mathematics Education: Tools, Topics and Trends (S. 227–244). Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  4. Ball, L., Drijvers, P., Ladel, S., Siller, H-S., Tabach, M., & Vale, C. (Eds.) (2018). Uses of Technology in Primary and Secondary Mathematics Education: Tools, Topics and Trends. Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  5. Barzel, B. (2007). “New technology? New Ways of Teaching - No time left for that!”. The International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 14(2), 77–86.Google Scholar
  6. Barzel, B., & Möller, R. (2001). About the use of the TI-92 for an Open Learning Approach to power Functions. A Teaching Study. ZDM, 33(1), 1–5.Google Scholar
  7. Berry, J., Monaghan, J., Kronfellner, M., & Kutzler, B. (Eds.) (1997). The state of computer algebra in mathematics education. Lund, Sweden: Chartwell-Bratt.Google Scholar
  8. Blume, G. W., & Heid, M. K. (Eds.) (2008). Research on Technology and the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics: Vol. 2. Cases and Perspectives. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.Google Scholar
  9. Fuglestad, A. B. (2009). ICT for inquiry in mathematics: A developmental research approach. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 28(2), 191–202.Google Scholar
  10. Hoyles, C., & Lagrange, J-b (Eds.) (2010). Mathematics education and technology – Rethinking the terrain, The 17th ICMI study. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Pierce, R., & Stacey, K. (2010). Mapping pedagogical opportunities provided by mathematics analysis software. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 15, 1–20.Google Scholar
  12. Trouche, L. (2004). Managing the complexity of human/machine interactions in computerized learning environments: Guiding students’ command process through instrumental orchestration. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 9, 281–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Yackel, E. (2002). What we can learn from analyzing the teacher’s role in collective argumentation. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21, 423–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 458–477.Google Scholar
  15. Zbiek, R. M., Heid, M. K., Blume, G. W., & Dick, T. P. (2007). Research on technology in mathematics education: A perspective of constructs. In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (S. 1169–1207). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  16. Zeller, M., & Barzel, B. (2010): Influences of CAS and GC in early algebra. ZDM Mathematics Education, 42(7), 775–788.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.MGSE, The University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralien

Personalised recommendations