Advertisement

Global und historisch Vergleichende Kapitalismusforschung und ihre Relevanz für sozioökonomische Bildung

  • Michael SchedelikEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Sozioökonomische Bildung und Wissenschaft book series (SOBIWI)

Zusammenfassung

Der Beitrag gibt Einblicke in das Forschungsprogramm der Vergleichenden Kapitalismusforschung, das in der Politischen Ökonomie mittlerweile geradezu kanonischen Status erlangt hat, und zeigt dessen Relevanz für sozioökonomische Bildung auf. Grundlegend wird argumentiert, dass eine solche interdisziplinäre, sozialwissenschaftliche Perspektive auf den Kapitalismus als Gesellschaftsform dessen Historizität und Sozialität in besonders geeigneter Weise zu erfassen vermag. Zunächst wird das Forschungsprogramm des Vergleichs kapitalistischer Gesellschaften vorgestellt, Bezüge zu ideengeschichtlichen Vorgängern hergestellt, konzeptionelle Weiterentwicklungen dargestellt und aktuelle Forschungsfragen diskutiert. Anhand des Beispiels der Eurokrise wird aufgezeigt, wie eine die strukturellen Gemeinsamkeiten und Unterschiede unterschiedlicher Kapitalismustypen in den Blick nehmende Perspektive einen wesentlichen Beitrag zum Verständnis tiefgreifender gesellschaftlicher (Krisen-)Phänomene leisten kann. Zuletzt werden Bezüge zu sozioökonomischer Bildung hergestellt.

Schlüsselbegriffe

Vergleichende Kapitalismusforschung Geschichte der Vergleichenden Kapitalismusforschung Varieties of Capitalism Growth Models Eurokrise sozioökonomische Bildung 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Aglietta, M. (1979). A Theory of Capitalist Regulation: The US Experience. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  2. Albert, M. (1992). Kapitalismus contra Kapitalismus. Frankfurt a. M.: Campus.Google Scholar
  3. Baccaro, L., & Pontusson, J. (2016). Rethinking Comparative Political Economy: The Growth Model Perspective. Politics & Society 44 (2), 175–207.Google Scholar
  4. Boyer, R. (1988). The Search for Labour Market Flexibility: The European Economies in Transition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  5. Amable, B. (2003). The Diversity of Modern Capitalism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Amable, B. (2016). Institutional Complementarities in the Dynamic Comparative Analysis of Capitalism. Journal of Institutional Economics 12 (1), 79–103.Google Scholar
  7. Becker, U. (2009). Open Varieties of Capitalism: Continuity, Change and Performances. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  8. Becker, U. (2013). The BRICs and Emerging Economies in Comparative Perspective: Political economy, liberalisation and institutional change. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Berger, S. D., & Dore, R. (1996). National Diversity and Global Capitalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bieling, H.-J. (2013). Vergleichende Kapitalismusanalyse aus der Perspektive einer neo-gramscianisch erweiterten Regulationstheorie. In I. Bruff, M. Ebenau, C. May, & A. Nölke (Hrsg.), Vergleichende Kapitalismusforschung: Stand, Perspektiven, Kritik (S. 178–193). Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.Google Scholar
  11. Bruff, I., Ebenau, M., May, C., & Nölke, A. (2013). Einleitung. In I. Bruff, M. Ebenau, C. May und A. Nölke (Hrsg.), Vergleichende Kapitalismusforschung: Stand, Perspektiven, Kritik (S. 9–20). Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.Google Scholar
  12. Bruff, I., Ebenau, M., & May, C. (2015). Fault and Fracture? The Impact of New Directions in Comparative Capitalisms Research on the Wider Field. In M. Ebenau, I. Bruff, & C. May (Hrsg.), New Directions in Comparative Capitalisms Research: Critical and Global Perspectives (S. 28–44). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  13. Buhr, D., & Frankenberger, R. (2014). Emerging varieties of incorporated capitalism: Theoretical considerations and empirical evidence. Business and Politics 16 (3), 393–427.Google Scholar
  14. Campbell, J. L., & Pedersen, O. K. (2007). The Varieties of Capitalism and Hybrid Success. Comparative Political Studies 40 (3), 307–332.Google Scholar
  15. Carney, R. W. (2016). Varieties of hierarchical capitalism: family and state market economies in East Asia. The Pacific Review 29 (2), 137–163.Google Scholar
  16. Clift, B. (2014). Comparative Political Economy: States, Markets, and Global Capitalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  17. Coates, D. (2015). Varieties of Capitalism and ‘the Great Moderation’. In M. Ebenau, I. Bruff, & C. May (Hrsg.), New Directions in Comparative Capitalisms Research: Critical and Global Perspectives (S. 11–27). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  18. Crouch, C. (2005). Capitalist Diversity and Change: Recombinant Governance and Institutional Entrepreneurs. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Crouch, C. (2010). Complementarity. In G. Morgan, J. L. Campell, C. Crouch, O. K. Pedersen, & R. Whitley (Hrsg.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Institutional Analysis (S. 117–137). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Crouch, C., & Streeck, W. (1997). Political Economy of Modern Capitalism: Mapping Convergence and Diversity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Crouch, C., & Voelzkow, H. (2009). Innovation in Local Economies: Germany in Comparative Context. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Deeg, R., & Jackson, G. (2007). Towards a more dynamic theory of capitalist variety. Socio-Economic Review 5 (1), 149–179.Google Scholar
  23. De Ville, F., & Vermeiren, M. (2016). The Eurozone crisis and the rise of China in the global monetary and trading system: The political economy of an asymmetric shock. Comparative European Politics 14 (5), 572–603.Google Scholar
  24. Dore, R. (1973). British Factory, Japanese Factory: The Origins of National Diversity in Industrial Relations. Berkely, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  25. Ebner, A. (2010). Varieties of Capitalism and the Limits of Entrepreneurship Policy: Institutional Reform in Germany’s Coordinated Market Economy. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade 10 (3-4), 319–341.Google Scholar
  26. Engartner, T., & Krisanthan, B. (2014). Ökonomische Bildung in Zeiten der Ökonomisierung – oder: Welchen Anforderungen muss sozio-ökonomische Bildung genügen? In A. Fischer, & B. Zurstrassen (Hrsg.), Sozioökonomische Bildung (S. 155–176). Bonn: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung.Google Scholar
  27. Gambarotto, F., & Solari, S. (2015). The Peripheralization of Southern European Capitalism within the EMU. Review of International Political Economy 22, 788–812.Google Scholar
  28. Hall, P. A. (2014). Varieties of Capitalism and the Euro Crisis. West European Politics 37 (6), 1223–1243.Google Scholar
  29. Hall, P. A., & Gingerich, D. W. (2009). Varieties of Capitalism and Institutional Complementarities in the Political Economy: An Empirical Analysis. British Journal of Political Science 39 (03), 449–482.Google Scholar
  30. Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (2001a). Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (2001b). An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism. In P. A. Hall, & D. Soskice (Hrsg.), Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage (S. 1–68). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Hall, P. A., & Thelen, K. (2009). Institutional Change in Varieties of Capitalism. Socio-Economic Review 7 (1), 7–34.Google Scholar
  33. Hancké, B., Rhodes M., & Thatcher M. (2007). Introduction: Beyond Varieties of Capitalism. In B. Hancké, M. Rhodes, & M. Thatcher (Hrsg.), Beyond Varieties of Capitalism: Conflict, Contradictions, and Complementarities in the European Economy (S. 3–38). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Hassel, A. (2014). Adjustments in the Eurozone: Varieties of Capitalism and the Crisis in Southern Europe. LEQS Paper No. 76/2014. London: London School of Economics.Google Scholar
  35. Hedtke, R.. (2014). Was ist sozio-ökonomische Bildung? In A. Fischer, & B. Zurstrassen (Hrsg.), Sozioökonomische Bildung (S. 81–127). Bonn: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung.Google Scholar
  36. Hessisches Kultusministerium (2016). Kerncurriculum gymnasiale Oberstufe: Politik und Wirtschaft. Wiesbaden: Hessisches Kultusministerium.Google Scholar
  37. Hollingsworth, J. R., & Boyer, R. (1997). Contemporary Capitalism: The Embeddedness of Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Höpner, M. (2005). What Connects Industrial Relations and Corporate Governance? Explaining Institutional Complementarity. Socio-Economic Review 3 (2), 331–358.Google Scholar
  39. Höpner, M., & Lutter M. (2017). The Diversity of Wage Regimes: Why the Eurozone Is Too Heterogeneous for the Euro. European Political Science Review, 1–26.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s1755773916000217.Google Scholar
  40. Howell, C. (2003). Varieties of Capitalism: And Then There Was One? Comparative Politics 36 (3), 102–124.Google Scholar
  41. Jackson, G., & Deeg, R. (2006). How Many Varieties of Capitalism? Comparing the Comparative Institutional Analyses of Capitalist Diversity. MPifG Discussion Paper 06/2, Köln: Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung.Google Scholar
  42. Kenworthy, L. (2006). Institutional Coherence and Macroeconomic Performance. Socio-Economic Review 4 (1), 69–91.Google Scholar
  43. Kocka, J. (2014). Geschichte des Kapitalismus. 2. Aufl. München: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
  44. Lobenstein, C. (2013). Die Ahnungslosen. ZeitOnline, 14. Februar 2013.Google Scholar
  45. May, C., & Nölke, A. (2015). Critical Institutionalism in Studies of Comparative Capitalisms: Conceptual Considerations and Research Programme. In M. Ebenau, I. Bruff, & C. May (Hrsg.), New Directions in Comparative Capitalisms Research: Critical and Global Perspectives (S. 83–100). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan,Google Scholar
  46. Milgrom, P., & Roberts J. (1992). Economics, Organization and Management. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  47. Molina, Ó., & Rhodes M. (2007). The Political Economy of Adjustment in Mixed Market Economies: A Study of Spain and Italy. In B. Hancké, M. Rhodes, & M. Thatcher (Hrsg.), Beyond Varieties of Capitalism: Conflict, Contradictions, and Complementarities in the European Economy (S. 223–252). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Nölke, A. (2016). Economic causes of the Eurozone crisis: the analytical contribution of Comparative Capitalism. Socio-Economic Review 14 (1), 141–161.Google Scholar
  49. Nölke, A., & May C. (2013). Vergleichende Kapitalismusforschung im Zeitalter der Krise der Finanzialisierung: Vom inter-nationalen zum inter-temporalen Studium ökonomischer Institutionen. Zeitschrift für Außen- und Sicherheitspolitik 6 (1), 51–70.Google Scholar
  50. Nölke, A., ten Brink, T., Claar S., & May C. (2015). Domestic structures, foreign economic policies and global economic order: Implications from the rise of large emerging economies. European Journal of International Relations 21 (3), 538–67.Google Scholar
  51. Nölke, A., & Vliegenthart A. (2009). Enlarging the Varieties of Capitalism: The Emergence of Dependent Market Economies in East Central Europe. World Politics 61 (4), 670–702.Google Scholar
  52. Peck, J., & Theodore N. (2007). Variegated Capitalism. Progress in Human Geography 31 (6), 731–772.Google Scholar
  53. Pies, I. (2017). Ökonomische Bildung 2.0: Eine ordonomische Perspektive. Diskussionspapier No. 201. Halle.Google Scholar
  54. Piore, M. J., & Sabel, C. F. (1984). The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  55. Pontusson, J. (2005). Varieties and Commonalities of Capitalism. In D. Coates (Hrsg.), Varieties of Capitalism, Varieties of Approaches (S. 163–188). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  56. Sablowski, T. (2013). Regulationstheorie. In J. Wullweber, A. Graf, & M. Behrens (Hrsg.), Theorien der Internationalen Politischen Ökonomie (S. 85–100). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
  57. Scharpf, F. W. (2017). Vom asymmetrischen Euro-Regime in die Transferunion – und was die deutsche Politik dagegen tun könnte. MPIfG Discussion Paper 17/15. Köln: Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung.Google Scholar
  58. Schmidt, V. A. (2003). French capitalism – transformed, yet still a third variety of capitalism. Economy and Society 32 (4), 526–554.Google Scholar
  59. Schmidt, V. A. (2009). Putting the Political Back into Political Economy by Bringing the State Back in Yet Again. World Politics 61 (3), 516–546.Google Scholar
  60. Schneider, B. R. (2013). Hierarchical Capitalism in Latin America: Business, Labor, and the Challenges of Equitable Development. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Schröder, M., & Voelzkow, H. (2016). Varieties of Regulation: How to Combine Sectoral, Regional and National Levels. Regional Studies 50 (1), 7–19.Google Scholar
  62. Shonfield, A. (1965). Modern Capitalism: The Changing Balance of Public and Private Power. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Sorge, A., & Streeck, W. (1988). Industrial Relations and Technical Change: The Case for an Extended Perspective. In R. Hyman, & W. Streeck (Hrsg.), New Technology and Industrial Relations (S. 19–47). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  64. Streeck, W. (1991). On the Institutional Conditions of Diversified Quality Production. In E. Matzner, & W. Streeck (Hrsg.), Beyond Keynesianism: The Socio-Economics of Production and Full Employment (S. 21–61). Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  65. Streeck, W. (2010). E Pluribus Unum? Varieties and Commonalities of Capitalism. MPIfG Discussion Paper 10/12. Köln: Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung.Google Scholar
  66. Streeck, W., & Thelen K. (2005). Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Teece, D. J., Pisano G., & Shuen A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal 18 (7), 509–533.Google Scholar
  68. Thelen, K. (2014). Varieties of Liberalization and the New Politics of Social Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Williamson, O. E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  70. Witt, M. A., & Jackson, G. (2016). Varieties of Capitalism and institutional comparative advantage: A test and reinterpretation. Journal of International Business Studies 47 (7), 778–806.Google Scholar
  71. Witt, M. A., & Redding, G. (2013). Asian Business Systems: Institutional Comparison, Clusters, and Implications for Varieties of Capitalism and Business Systems Theory. Socio-Economic Review 11 (2), 265–300.Google Scholar
  72. Wood, G., & Lane C. (2011). Capitalist Diversity and Diversity within Capitalism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Goethe University Frankfurt am MainFrankfurtDeutschland

Personalised recommendations