Advertisement

Das Recht der Anderen

Rechtsethnologie zwischen Pluralität, Indigenität und Alterität
  • Judith BeyerEmail author
Chapter

Zusammenfassung

Die Rechtswissenschaft und die Ethnologie haben denselben Forschungsgegenstand – die Ordnung des menschlichen Zusammenlebens. Sie nähern sich ihm nur aus unterschiedlichen Richtungen: In der Rechtswissenschaft wird der Mensch seit dem 19. Jahrhundert mit seiner Geburt als Rechtssubjekt und Träger von Rechten und Pflichten betrachtet.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Adam, L. (1937). Ethnologische Rechtsforschung. In K. T. Preuss (Hrsg.), Lehrbuch für Völkerkunde (S. 280–306). Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke.Google Scholar
  2. Bachofen, J. J. (1861). Mutterrecht. Stuttgart: Krais und Hoffmann.Google Scholar
  3. Benda-Beckmann, F. v., & Benda-Beckmann, K. v. (2007). Gesellschaftliche Wirkung von Recht. Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar
  4. Benda-Beckmann, F. v., Benda-Beckmann, K. v., & Griffiths, A. (Hrsg.). (2009). The Power of Law in a Transnational World. Anthropological Inquiries. Oxford & New York: Berghahn.Google Scholar
  5. Beyer, J. (2016). The Force of Custom. Law and the Ordering of Everyday Life in Kyrgyzstan. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
  6. Beyer, J., & Girke, F. (2015). Practicing Harmony Ideology. Ethnographic Reflections on Community and Coercion. Common Knowledge. In J. Perl (Hrsg.). Sonderband: Peace by Other Means. Symposium on the Role of Ethnography and the Humanities in the Understanding, Prevention, and Resolution of Enmity. Part 3. 21, 2, S. 196–235.Google Scholar
  7. Birrell, K. (2016). Indigeneity. Before and beyond the law. Milton Park & New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blumer, H. (1954). What’s Wrong with Social Ttheory? American Sociological Review, 19, 1, S. 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bohannan, P. (1957). Justice and Judgment Among the Tiv. London & New York: Oxford University Press.Bohannan, P., & Van der Elst, D. (1998). Asking and Listening. Ethnography as Personal Adaptation. Prospect Heights: Waveland.Google Scholar
  10. Brown, A. R. (1952). Structure and Function in Primitive Society. London: Cohen & West.Google Scholar
  11. Buffon, G.-C. L. (1750–1774). Allgemeine Naturgeschichte. Troppau: Traßler & Kompanie.Google Scholar
  12. Carrithers, M., Matei, C., Sykes, K., Holbraad, M., & Venkatesan, S. (2010). Ontology is just Another Word for Culture. Motion Tabled at the 2008 Meeting of the Group for Debates in Anthropological Theory, University of Manchester. Critique of Anthropology, 30, 2, S. 152–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Charlesworth, H., & Larking, E. (Hrsg.). (2015). Human Rights and the Universal Periodic Review. Rituals and Ritualism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Clifford, J. (2013). Returns. Becoming Indigenous in the Twenty-first Century. Cambridge, Massachusetts & London, England: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Comaroff, John, & Comaroff, Jean. (2009). Ethnicity, Inc. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. De Lauri, A. (Hrsg.). (2015). The Politics of Human Rights. Security, Aid and the Hidden Agendas of Humanitarianism. London: I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  17. Donovan, J. (2008). Legal Anthropology. An Introduction. Lanham & Plymouth: AltaMira.Google Scholar
  18. Ellingson, T. (2001). The Myth of the Noble Savage. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  19. Elwert, G., Feuchtwang, S., & Neubert, D. (Hrsg.). (1999). Dynamics of Violence. Processes of Escalation and De-escalation in Violent Group Conflicts. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
  20. Epstein, A. L. (1973). The Reasonable Man Revisited. Some Problems in the Anthropology of Law. Law and Society Review, 7, 4, S. 643–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fassin, D. (2013). Enforcing Order. An Ethnography of Urban Policing. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  22. Fassin, D. (2017). Writing the World of Policing. The Difference Ethnography Makes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  23. Garriott, W. (Hrsg.). (2013). Policing and Contemporary Governance. The Anthropology of Police in Practice. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  24. Gluckman, M. (1955). The Judicial Process Among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Graeber, D. (2015). Radical Alterity is just Another Way of Saying ‘Reality’. A Reply to Eduardo Viveiros de Castro. HAU, 5, 2.  https://doi.org/10.14318/hau5.2.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Green, N. (2000). Chasing an Identity. An Aboriginal Perspective on Aboriginality. In K. Reed-Gilbert (Hrsg.), The Strength of Us as Women: Black Women Speak. (S. 47–53). Chamwood: Ginninderra Press.Google Scholar
  27. Green, S. (2013). Borders and the Relocation of Europe. Annual Review of Anthropology, 42, S. 345–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Grünberger, M. (2016). Transnationales Recht als responsiver Rechtspluralismus? Der Staat, 55:1, S. 117–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gulliver, P. H. (1963). Social Control in an African Society: A Study of the Arusha: Agricultural Masia of Northern Tanganyika. Boston: Boston University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Gupta, A. (2012). Red Tape. Bureaucracy, Structural Violence, and Poverty in India. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Halme-Tuomisaari, M. (2010). Human Rights in Action. Learning Expert Knowledge. Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Heraklit, Fragmente, B 12.Google Scholar
  33. Hetherington, G. (2011). Guerilla Auditors. The Politics of Transparency in Neoliberal Paraguay. Durham NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Hume, D. (1738). Traktat über die menschliche Natur.Google Scholar
  35. Ingold, T., & Palsson, G. (Hrsg.). (2013). Biosocial Becomings. Integrating Social and Biological Anthropology. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Kohl, K.-H. (2012). Ureinwohner. Zur Geschichte und Kritik einer aktuellen politischen Kategorie. In M. Ott & T. Döring (Hrsg.), Urworte. Zur Geschichte und Funktion erstbegründender Begriffe (S. 77–91). Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar
  37. Kohler, J. (1897). Das Recht der Australneger. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Rechtswissenschaft, 7, S. 321–368.Google Scholar
  38. Kuper, A. (2003). The Return of the Native. Current Anthropology, 44, 3, S. 389–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lafitau, J. (1724). Sauvages Américains comparées aux moeurs des premiers temps. Paris: Saugrain l’aîné.Google Scholar
  40. Latour, B. (2007). Eine neue Soziologie für eine neue Gesellschaft. Einführung in die Akteur-Netzwerk-Theorie. Aus dem Englischen von G. Roßler. Suhrkamp: Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
  41. Lescarbot, M. (1609). Histoire de la nouvelle France. Paris. Archive Org https://archive.org/details/histoiredelanouv00lesc_2. Zugegriffen: 19. Juni 2017.
  42. Llewellyn, K., & Adamson Hoebel, E. (1941). The Cheyenne Way. Conflict and Case Law in Primitive Jurisprudence. Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
  43. Maine, H. S. (1861). Ancient Law. London: John Murray.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Malinowski, B. (1926). Crime and Custom in Savage Society. London: K. Paul.Google Scholar
  45. Malinowski, B. (1942). A New Instrument for the Interpretation of Law – Especially Primitive. The Yale Law Journal, 51, 8, S. 1237–1254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mauss, M. (1990 [1923/24]). Die Gabe. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  47. Merry, S. E. (1993). Legal Pluralism and Transnational Culture. The Ka Ho’Okolokolonui Kanaka Maoli Tribunal, Hawai’i. In R. A. Wilson (Hrsg.), Human Rights, Culture and Context. Anthropological Perspectives (S. 28–48). Chicago: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  48. Michaels, R. (2009). Global Legal Pluralism. Annual Review of Law & Social Science, 5, S. 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Montesquieu, C. S. (1748). L’esprit de loi. Genf: Barrillot & Fils.Google Scholar
  50. Moore, S. F. (2005). Certainties Undone. Fifty Turbulent Years of Legal Anthropology, 1949–1999. In S. F. Moore (Hrsg.), Law and Anthropology. A Reader (S. 346–367). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  51. Morgan, L. H. (1877). Ancient Society. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  52. Müller, G. F. (2010). Ethnographische Schriften I. Bearbeitet von W. Hintzsche & A. C. Elert. Bd. VIII. Halle: Verlag der Franckeschen Stiftungen zu Halle.Google Scholar
  53. Nader, L. (1965). The Anthropological Study of Law. American Anthropologist, 67, 6, S. 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Niezen, R. (2003). Culture and the Judiciary. The Meaning of the Culture Concept as a Source of Aboriginal Rights in Canada. Canadian Journal of Law and Society / La Revue Canadienne Droit et Societé, 18, 2, S. 1–26.Google Scholar
  55. Niezen, R., & Sapignoli, M. (Hrsg.). (2016). Palaces of Hope. The Anthropology of Global Organizations. New York et al.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Pirie, F., & Scheele, J. (Hrsg.). (2014). Legalism. Community and Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Pospisil, L. (1958). The Kapauku Papuans of West New Guinea. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  58. Post, A. (1890). Grundriss der ethnologischen Jurisprudenz. Oldenburg & Leipzig: Schulzesche Hof-Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
  59. Povinelli, E. (2002). The Cunning of Recognition. Indigenous Alterities and the Making of Australian Multiculturalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Radcliffe-Brown, A. (2012). Structure and function in primitive society essays and addresses. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  61. Randeria, S. (2008). Legal Pluralism, Social Movements and the Post-colonial State in India. Fractured Sovereignty and Differential Citizenship Rights. In B. de Sousa Santos (Hrsg.), Another Knowledge Is possible. Beyond Northern Epistemologies, 3 (S. 41–74). London: Verso.Google Scholar
  62. Reeves, M. (2014). Border Work. Spatial Lives of the Sstate in Rural Central Asia. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Roberts, S. (1998). Against Legal Pluralism. Some Reflections on the Contemporary Enlargement of the Legal Domain. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law. 30, 42, S. 95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rouland, N. (1994). Legal Anthropology. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Rousseau, J. (1755). Discours sur l’origine et les fondements de l’inégalité parmi les hommes. Amsterdam: Marc-Michel Rey.Google Scholar
  66. Sahlins, M. (1972). Stone age economics. Chicago, Ill.: Aldine/Atherton.Google Scholar
  67. Schapera, I. (1938). A Handbook of Tswana Law and Custom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Schott, R. (1982). Main Trends in German Ethnological Jurisprudence and Legal Ethnology. Journal of Legal Pluralism, 20, S. 37–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Seinecke, R. (2015). Das Recht des Rechtspluralismus. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
  70. Sharma, A., & Gupta, A. (2006). The Anthropology of the State. A Reader. Malden & Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  71. Smith, P. C. (2009). Everything You Know About Indians is Wrong. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  72. Smith, W. J. (2014). The War on Humans. Seattle: Discovery Institute Press.Google Scholar
  73. Spivak, G. C. (1993). Outside in the Teaching Machine. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  74. Starr, J., & Collier, J. (1998). History and Power in the Study of Law. New Directions in Legal Anthropology. Ithaca & London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Strathern, Marilyn (1988). The Gender of the Gift: Problems with Women and Problems with Society in Melanesia. Berkeley, California: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  76. Tamanaha, B. (1993). The Folly of the ‚Social Scientific’ Concept of Legal Pluralism. Journal of Law and Society, 20, 2, S. 192–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Teubner, G. (1996). Global Bukowina. Zur Emergenz eines transnationalen Rechtspluralismus. Rechtshistorisches Journal, 15, S. 253–290.Google Scholar
  78. Tsing, A. (2012). Unruly Edges. Mushrooms as Companion Species. Environmental Humanities, 1,1, S. 141–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Vanderlinen, J. (1971). Le pluralisme juridique. Essai de synthèse. In J. Gilissen (Hrsg.), Le pluralisme juridique (S. 19–56). Brüssel: Université Libre de Bruxelles.Google Scholar
  80. Vermeulen, H. (2015). Before Boas. The Genesis of Ethnography and Ethnology in the German Enlightenment. Lincoln & London: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  81. Wesel, U. (2001). Geschichte des Rechts. Von den Frühformen bis zur Gegenwart. 2. Aufl., München: Beck.Google Scholar
  82. Zippelius, R. (1994). Rechtsphilosophie. Ein Studienbuch. 3. Aufl., München: Beck.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.KonstanzDeutschland

Personalised recommendations