Advertisement

Bringing more ‘school’ into our educational institutions. Reclaiming school as pedagogic form

  • Jan MasscheleinEmail author
  • Maarten Simons
Chapter

Zusammenfassung

Today the issue of ‘educational change’ is widely discussed. Such change, so we can hear, is needed because of increasing linguistic heterogeneity and cultural diversity, because of technological developments and because of the persisting correlation between social background and educational success. In this context ‘educational’ seems to refer to the institutional practice of the school. But what do we mean by school? In our contribution, we offer some elements of what we call an internal pedagogical perspective on school and on scholastic learning which clarifies its emancipatory potential as pedagogic form. This will allow us to address the issue of educational change differently and to substantiate a plea for bringing more ‘school’ into our educational institutions. We (1) distinguish between an internal perspective and various external perspectives on the school. We, than, (2) sketch the basic assumptions, operations and experiences of the school as pedagogic form emphasizing (3) that school is technically, pedagogically and practically composed and (4) indicating very briefly how school has and is been tamed. Finally (5) we suggest some challenges for making or reinventing school today, relating it briefly to the issue of teacher education.

Schlüsselwörter:

taming school pedagogic form scholastic learning school operations emancipation learning environments 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Apple, M. (1979). Ideology and curriculum. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  2. Arendt, H. (2006). The crisis in education (1958). In Arendt, H. (Ed.), Between Past and Future (pp. 170–193). New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  3. Bachelard, G. (1934/1967). La formation de l’esprit scientifique. Contribution à une psychanalyse de la connaissance objective. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
  4. Becker, G.S. (1976). The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Butler, J. (2015). Notes toward a performative theory of assembly. Cambridge/London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Esposito, R. (2015). Persons and Things. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  7. Flusser, V. (1999). The factory. In Flusser, V. (Ed.), The Shape of Things: A Philosophy of Design [Vom Stand der Dinge: Eine Kleine Philosophie des Design]. Trans. Anthony Mathews, 1993 (pp. 43–50). London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
  8. Foucault, M. (1975). Surveiller et punir. Naissance de la prison. Paris : Gallimard.Google Scholar
  9. Foucault, M. (2001). L’hermeneutique du sujet. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  10. Freire, P. (2005). Teachers as Cultural Workers. Letters to Those Who Dare Teach. (Expanded Edition). Cambridge: West View Press.Google Scholar
  11. Kohlberg, L., & R. Mayer (1972). Development as the aim of education. Harvard Educational Review, 42(4), 449–496.Google Scholar
  12. Lancy, David F. (2008). The Anthropology of Childhood: Cherubs, Chattel, Changelings. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Masschelein, J., & Simons, M. (2013). In defense of school. A public issue. Leuven: Education Culture and Society publishers.Google Scholar
  14. Masschelein, J., & Simons, M. (2015a). Lessons of/for Europe. Reclaiming the school and the university. In Gielen P. (Ed.), No culture, no Europe. On the foundation of politics (pp. 143-164). Amsterdam: Valiz.Google Scholar
  15. Masschelein, J. & M. Simons (2015b). Education in Times of Fast Learning: the Future of the School. Ethics and Education, 10(1), 84–95.Google Scholar
  16. Peschar, J., & Wesselingh, A. (Eds.). (1995). Onderwijssociologie, een inleiding. Groningen: Woltern-Noordhoff.Google Scholar
  17. Rancière, J. (1988). École, production, égalité. In Renou, X. (Ed.) L’école contre la démocratie (pp. 79–96). Paris: Edilig.Google Scholar
  18. Schultz, T. W. (1971). Investment in human capital: the role of education and of research. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  19. Simons, M. (2014). Governing through feedback: From national orientation towards global positioning. In Fenwick, T., Mangez, E., & Ozga, J. (Eds.), World Yearbook of Education 2014: Governing Knowledge: Comparison, Knowledge-Based Technologies and Expertise in the Regulation of Education (pp.155–171). London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Simons, M., & Masschelein, J. (2008). From schools to learning environments: The dark side of being exceptional. Journal of philosophy of education, 42 (3–4), 687–704.Google Scholar
  21. Simons, M., & Masschelein, J. (2017). De leerling centraal in het Onderwijs? Grenzen van personalisering. [Putting the learner central stage? Limits of personalization]. Leuven: ACCO.Google Scholar
  22. Sloterdijk, P. (2013). You must change your life. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  23. Stiegler, B. (2013) Die Aufklärung in the Age of Philosophical Engineering. In: Hildebrandt, M., O’Hara, K. & Waidner, M. (Eds), Digital Enlightenment Yearbook (pp. 29–39). Amsterdam/Berlin: IOS PressGoogle Scholar
  24. Verburgh, A., Simons M., Masschelein J., Janssen, R., Elen, J., & Cornelissen, G. (2016). School: Everyone can learn everything. In: Achten, V., Bouckaert, G., & Schokkaert, E. (Eds.), ’A truly golden handbook’: The scholarly quest for Utopia (pp. 263–271). Leuven: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory for Education and Society, Research Group Education, Culture & SocietyK.U.LeuvenLeuvenBelgien

Personalised recommendations