Advertisement

Design principles in design research: A commentary

  • Arthur BakkerEmail author
Chapter

Zusammenfassung

In the context of this book, innovation is about achieving desirable goals in domain- specific education. The various contributions to the second part of the book provide knowledge about how to achieve something worthwhile in a particular domain, and all do so in the form of design principles as a result from design research. Such principles are popular in design research and other approaches to innovate educational practice, but education and educational research would benefit from further reflection on what they are and how they are grounded in research and practice. My commentary therefore reflects on design principles in design research. For the various chapters, I analyze whether the design principles as formulated are values, criteria, predictions, advice, or heuristics. I argue that design research would benefit from more clarity of the nature of design principles, and what counts as empirical support. Moreover, I reflect on how design principles could be communicated in a succinct form so that they can inspire others to use them wisely in educational practice.

Schlüsselwörter:

design principles conjecture mapping design-based research 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Argyris, C. (1996). Actionable knowledge: Design causality in the service of consequential theory. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 32(4), 390–406.Google Scholar
  2. Bakker, A. (2018). Design research in education: A practical guide for early career researchers. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Bakker, A., & Smit, J. (2018). Using hypothetical learning trajectories in design research In A. Bakker (Ed.), Design research in education: A practical guide for early career researchers (pp. 256–272). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Biesta, G. J. J. (2009). Good education in an age of measurement: On the need to reconnect with the question of purpose in education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 33–46.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, A. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141–178.Google Scholar
  6. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages. https://www.coe.int/en/web/lang-migrants/linguistic-and-cultural-mediation [29.04.2018].
  7. Collins, A. (1990). Toward a design science of education. Technical report. New York, NY: Center for Technology in Education.Google Scholar
  8. Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15–42.Google Scholar
  9. Cremers, P. H. M., Wals, A. E., Wesselink, R., & Mulder, M. (2017). Utilization of design principles for hybrid learning configurations by interprofessional design teams. Instructional Science, 45(2), 289–309.Google Scholar
  10. Cviko, A., McKenney, S., & Voogt, J. (2014). Teacher roles in designing technology-rich learning activities for early literacy: A cross-case analysis. Computers & Education, 72, 68–79.Google Scholar
  11. Edelson, D. C. (2002). Design research: What we learn when we engage in design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(1), 105–121.Google Scholar
  12. Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting mathematics education: China lectures. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  13. Fullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Gravemeijer, K. (1998). Developmental research as a research method. In J. Kilpatrick & A. Sierpinska (Eds.), Mathematics education as a research domain: A search for identity (An ICMI Study) (pp. 277–295). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  15. Greeno, J. G. (2016). Cultural-Historical Activity Theory/Design-based research in Pasteur’s Quadrant. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(4), 634–639.Google Scholar
  16. Kali, Y. (2008). The design principles database as means for promoting design-based research. In A. E. Kelly, R. A. Lesh, & J. Y. Baek (Eds.), Handbook of design research methods in education: Innovations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics learning and teaching (pp. 423–438). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  17. Mintrop, R. (2016). Design-based school improvement: A practical guide for education leaders. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
  18. Moll, L. C., & Diaz, S. (1987). Change as the goal of educational research. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 18(4), 300–311.Google Scholar
  19. Phillips, D. C., & Dolle, J. R. (2006). From Plato to Brown and beyond: Theory, practice, and the promise of design experiments. In L. Verschaffel, F. Dochy, M. Boekaerts, & S. Vosniadou (Eds.), Instructional psychology: Past, present and future trends. Sixteen essays in honour of Erik De Corte (pp. 277–292). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  20. Plomp, T., & Nieveen, N. (2013). Educational design research: Introduction and illustrative cases. Enschede: SLO.Google Scholar
  21. Prediger, S. (2015). Theorien und Theoriebildung in didaktischer Forschung und Entwicklung. In R. Bruder, L. Hefendehl-Hebeker, B. Schmidt-Thieme & H.-G. Weigand (Hrsg.). Handbuch der Mathematikdidaktik (pp. 643–662). Heidelberg: Springer Spektrum.Google Scholar
  22. Reinking, D., & Bradley, B. (2004). Connecting research and practice using formative and design experiments. In N. Duke & M. Mallette (Eds.), Literacy research methodologies (2nd ed., pp. 149–169). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  23. Russell, T. L. (1999). The no significant difference phenomenon: As reported in 355 research reports, summaries and papers. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University.Google Scholar
  24. Sandoval, W. A. (2014). Conjecture mapping: An approach to systematic educational design research. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(1), 18–36.Google Scholar
  25. Schwartz, D. L., Chang, J., & Martin, L. (2008). Instrumentation and innovation in design experiments: Taking the turn towards efficiency. In A. E. Kelly, R. A. Lesh, & J. Y. Baek (Eds.), Handbook of design research methods in education: Innovations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics learning and teaching (pp. 47– 67). London: Routledge.Simon, M. A. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(2), 114–145.Google Scholar
  26. The Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8.Google Scholar
  27. Van den Akker, J. (1999). Principles and methods of development research Design approaches and tools in education and training (pp. 1–14): Springer.Google Scholar
  28. Van den Akker, J. (2013). Curricular development research as specimen of educational design research. In T. Plomp & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research. Part A: An introduction (pp. 53–70). Enschede, the Netherlands: SLO.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Freudenthal InstituteUtrecht UniversityUtrechtNetherlands

Personalised recommendations