Foreign NGOs in Israel: An Anthropological Perspective

  • Dani Kranz
Part of the Edition ZfAS book series (EDZFAS)


This paper adopts an anthropological approach by looking at the role, work and influence of foreign NGOs—German political foundations and others—in Israel and the Palestinian Territories. It includes observations of all three major groups—Israelis, Palestinians as well as “internationals”—and their different perspectives and motivations. Nevertheless, the focus lies on the much-discussed Israeli perspective and its conflictual and multifaceted positions, which have been discussed at length both in Israel and in Europe.


  1. Anderson, B. (2013). Us & Them? the dangerous politics of immigration control. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ghanem, A. (2011). The expanding ethnocracy: Judaization of the public sphere. Israel Studies Review, 26(1), 21–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hagemann, S., & Nathanson, R. (2015). Deutschland und Israel heute: Verbindende Vergangenheit, trennende Gegenwart? Bertelsmann Stiftung.
  4. IfD Allensbach. (2016). „Generation Mitte” 2016—Die Studienergebnisse im Überblick. September 8, 2016.
  5. Kranz, D. (2016a). Quasi-ethnic capital vs. quasi–citizenship capital: Access to Israeli citizenship. Migration Letters, 13(1), 64–83.
  6. Kranz, D. (2016b). Forget Israel—The future is in Berlin! Local Jews, Russian immigrants and Israeli Jews in Berlin and across Germany. Shofar, 34(4), 1–24.Google Scholar
  7. Kranz, D. (forthcoming a). Almost Jew: Children of foreign, Non-Jewish mothers and Israeli Jewish fathers. In R. Lipshitz & H. Zubida (Eds.), Borders. Tel Aviv: Yediot (Hebrew).Google Scholar
  8. Kranz, D. (forthcoming b). Ein Plädoyer für den Alloismus: Historische Kontinuitäten, Zeitgeist und transkultureller Antisemitismus. In O. Decker (Ed.), Mitte-Studien 2018. Leipzig: Leipzig University.Google Scholar
  9. Kranz, D., & Zubida, H. (forthcoming). Working hand or humans? Temporary migrants in Israel and Germany: Between acceptance and rejection in the social and legal spheres. In A. Kewes et al. (Eds.), Citizenship between inclusion and exclusion. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  10. Lustick, I. S. (2016). The changing holocaust in Israeli political culture: Effects of the ‘Template for Jewish Life’ construction on Israeli foreign policy. Paper delivered at the EAIS Conference. London. September 6, 2016.Google Scholar
  11. Masri, M. (2013). Love suspended: Demography, comparative law and Palestinian couples in the Israeli supreme court. Social & Legal Studies, 22(3), 309–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nathan, G. (2012). The OECD Expert Group on Migration (SOPEMI) Report, Immigration in Israel 2011–2012. Retrieved from Jerusalem.
  13. Olesker, R. (2014). Law-making and the Securitization of the Jewish Identity in Israel. Ethnopolitics, 13(2), 105–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pew Research Center (2016). Israel’s Religiously Divided Society. March 8, 2016.
  15. Smith, R. M. (2015). The questions facing citizenship in the twenty-first century. In R. Marback & M. W. Kruman (Eds.), The meaning of citizenship (pp. 12–13). Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Yiftachel, O. (2006). Ethnocracy: Land and identity politics in Israel/Palestine. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  17. Yurdakul, G. (2016). Jews, Muslims and the ritual male circumcision debate: Religious diversity and social inclusion in Germany. Social Inclusion, 4(2), 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dani Kranz
    • 1
  1. 1.Two Fox ConsultingBergheimDeutschland

Personalised recommendations