Advertisement

Resilience Constructions: How to Make the Differences Between Theoretical Concepts Visible?

  • Stefan BöschenEmail author
  • Claudia R. Binder
  • Andreas Rathgeber
Chapter

Abstract

The concept of resilience has performed an amazing career. Starting out in some selected disciplines, such as psychology and ecology, it has been applied in a vast variety of disciplines including natural sciences, humanities, and social sciences. Resilience deals with the characteristics of individuals, units—more abstractly: entities—that enable them to not only maintain their identity in face of unusual or critical situations, but to potentially even emerge strengthened from such stressful situations.

Notes

Acknowledgements

First, we want to thank Benedikt Gleich, Herbert Mayer, Holger Sauter for their support in data collection and all colleagues from the research consortium ForChange for their cooperation and constructive criticism. Special thanks go to our colleagues Susan Mühlemeier, Romano Wyss and Thorsten Schilling for active discussion, valuable suggestions and notes on compilation of the essay. We also thank the Bavarian State Ministry for Science, Research and Art, which subsidised the projects in the scope of the Bavarian research association ForChange.

References

  1. Adger, N. (2000). Social and ecological resilience. Progress in Human Geography 24, 347–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barrett, C. & Constas, M. (2014). Toward a theory of resilience for international development applications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 111, 14625–14630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Binder, C. R., Mühlemeier, S. & Wyss, R. (2017). An indicator-based approach for analyzing the resilience of transitions for energy regions. Part I: Theoretical and conceptual considerations. Energies 10 (36).  https://doi.org/10.3390/en10010036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Biggs, R., Schlüter, M., Biggs, D. et al. (2012). Toward principles for enhancing the resilience of ecosystem services. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 37, 421–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bobar, A. & Winder, G. (2017). Conceptualizing resilience in transformation processes. Working with context resilience and specifying interrelated systems in Bavaria’s forest and wood use systems. GAIA 26 (S1), 191–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Böschen, S., Binder, C. & Rathgeber A. (2017). Resilienzkonstruktionen: Divergenz und Konvergenz von Theoriemodellen – eine konzeptionell-empirische Analyse. GAIA 26 (S1), 216–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brand, F., Hoheisel, D. & Kirchhoff, T. (2011). Der Resilienz-Ansatz auf dem Prüfstand: Herausforderungen, Probleme, Perspektiven. In Bayerischen Akademie für Naturschutz und Landschaftspflege (ed.), Landschaftsökologie. Grundlagen, Methoden, Anwendungen (pp. 78–83). Laufen: Bayerische Akademie für Naturschutz und Landschaftspflege.Google Scholar
  8. Braun, C., Gralke, V. M. & Nieding, G. (2018). Medien und gesellschaftlicher Wandel – Eine empirische Studie zu der Frage, ob Medienkompetenz im Jugend- und frühen Erwachsenenalter einen Resilienzfaktor darstellt. In M. Karidi, R. Gutwald & M. Schneider (eds.), Resilienz. Interdisziplinäre Perspektiven zu Wandel und Transformation (pp. 177–202). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
  9. Connor, K. M. & Davidson, J. R. T. (2003). Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depression and Anxiety 18 (2), 76–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dunteman, G. H. (1989). Principal component analysis. London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Endress, M. & Maurer, A. (eds.). (2015). Resilienz im Sozialen. Theoretische und empirische Analysen. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
  12. Folke, C., Carpenter, S. R., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Chapin, T., Rockström, J. (2010). Resilience thinking: integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecology and Society 15 (4), art. 20. http:// www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art20/.
  13. ForChange. (2017). Forschungsverbund Fit for Change. Abschlussbericht. Forschungszeitraum Juni 2013 – August 2017. Augsburg etc.Google Scholar
  14. Frensch, R. (2015). External liberalization, specialization, and institutional change in times of globalization: The case of Central, East and Southeast Europe. IOS Policy Paper, No. 6.Google Scholar
  15. Gabriel, T. (2005). Resilienz – Kritik und Perspektiven. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik 51, 208–218.Google Scholar
  16. Gailing, L. & Röhring, A. (2016). Is it all about collaborative governance? Alternative ways of understanding the success of energy regions. Utilities Policy 41, 237–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gralke, V. M., Braun, C. & Nieding, G. (2017a). Can media literacy foster interest in politics in adolescents and young adults? Würzburg: Würzburg University Working Paper.Google Scholar
  18. Gralke, V. M., Braun, C. & Nieding, G. (2017b). The impact of media literacy on young people’s academic attainment and abilities. Würzburg: Würzburg University Working Paper.Google Scholar
  19. Gunderson, L., Allen, C. & Holling, C. S. (eds.). (2010). Foundations of ecological resilience. Washington: Island Press.Google Scholar
  20. Günther, E. (2009). Klimawandel und Resilience Management. Interdisziplinäre Konzeption eines entscheidungsorientierten Ansatzes. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hartung, J. & Elpelt, B. (2007). Multivariate Statistik. 7. ed. Munich and Vienna: Oldenbourg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hecher, M., Vilsmaier, U., Akhavan, R. & Binder, C. R. (2016). An integrative analysis of energy transitions in energy regions: A case study of ökoEnergieland in Austria. Ecological Economics 121, 40–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hurtienne, J., Stilijanow, U. & Junghanns, G. (2014). Time and work pressure in current working life. In C. Korunka & P. Hoonakker (eds.), The impact of ICT on quality of working life (pp. 63–85). Dordrecht: Springer VS.Google Scholar
  25. Kaiser, H. F. (1958). The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika 23, 187–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Keck, M. & Sakdapolrak, P. (2013). What is social resilience? Lessons learned and ways forward. Erdkunde 67, 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Klagge, B., Schmole, H., Seidl, I. & Schön, S. (2016). Zukunft der deutschen Energiegenossenschaften: Herausforderungen und Chancen aus einer Innovationsperspektive. Raumforschung und Raumordnung 74 (3), 243–258.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13147-016-0398-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kunze, C. (2013). Die Energiewende und ihre geographische Diffusion. In L. Gailing & M. Leibenath (eds.), Neue Energielandschaften – neue Perspektiven der Landschaftsforschung (pp. 33–43). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lebel, L., Anderies, J. M., Campbell, B., Folke, C., Hatfield-Dodds, S., Hughes, T. P. & Wilson, J. (2006). Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society 11 (1), art. 19. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art19/.
  30. Luthe, T. & Wyss, R. (2015). Introducing adaptive waves as a concept to inform mental models of resilience. Sustainability Science 10, 673–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mergenthaler, A. (2012). Gesundheitliche Resilienz. Konzept und Empirie zur Reduzierung gesundheitlicher Ungleichheit im Alter. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Meyen, M., Thieroff, M. & Strenger, S. (2014). Mass media logic and the mediatization of politics. Journalism Studies 15, 271–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Müller, J. R., Dornoik, D., Flieger, B., Holstenkamp, L., Mey, F. & Radtke, J. (2015). Energy cooperatives: the success story needs new dynamics. GAIA 24 (2), 96–101.Google Scholar
  34. Nöker, M. & Petermann, F. (2008). Resilienz: Funktionale Adaptation an widrige Umgebungsbedingungen. Zeitschrift für Psychiatrie, Psychologie und Psychotherapie 56, 255–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ohlhorst, D. (2016). Germany’s energy transition policy between national targets and decentralized responsibilities. In K. Jörgensen, A. Jogesh & A. Mishra (eds.), Special issue ‘subnational climate policy’, Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences 12 (4), 303–322.Google Scholar
  36. Olsson, P., Galaz, V. & Boonstra, W. J. (2014). Sustainability transformations: a resilience perspective. Ecology and Society 19. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-06799-19040.
  37. Schneider, M. & Vogt, M. (2017). Responsible resilience: Rekonstruktion der Normativität von Resilienz auf Basis einer responsiven Ethik. GAIA 26 (S1), 174–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Thomas, W. I & Thomas, D. S. (1928). The child in America: Behavior problems and programs. New York: A. A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  39. Walker, B, Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S. R. & Kinzig, A. (2004). Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systems. Ecology and Society 9 (2), art. 5. https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art5/.
  40. WBGU (2011). Word in transition. A social contract for sustainability. Berlin: WGBU. https://www.wbgu.de/fileadmin/user_upload/wbgu.de/templates/dateien/veroeffentlichungen/hauptgutachten/jg2011/wbgu_jg2011_en.pdf.
  41. Walker, B., Gunderson, L., Kinzig, A., Folke, C., Carpenter, S. & Schultz, L. (2006). A handful of heuristics and some propositions for understanding resilience in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society 11, art. 13. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art13.
  42. Werner, E. E., Bierman, J. M. & French, F. E. (1971). The children of Kauai: A longitudinal study from the prenatal period to age ten. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  43. Wink, R. (ed.). (2016). Multidisziplinäre Perspektiven der Resilienzforschung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefan Böschen
    • 1
    Email author
  • Claudia R. Binder
    • 2
  • Andreas Rathgeber
    • 3
  1. 1.Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule AachenAachenGermany
  2. 2.École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), ENAC/HERUSLausanneSwitzerland
  3. 3.Universität AugsburgAugsburgGermany

Personalised recommendations