Advertisement

Genderstereotype bei Lehrkräften: Ein Review

  • Miriam Nürnberger
  • Josef Nerb
Chapter

Zusammenfassung

Trotz des in den letzten Jahrzehnten zunehmenden Engagements von Frauen im Bereich der Mathematik, Informatik, Naturwissenschaften und Technik bleiben Geschlechtsunterschiede beim Interesse und der Berufs- und Studienwahlen bestehen. Die zahlreichen Theorien über die Ursachen dieser Geschlechtsunterschiede lassen sich in den meisten Fällen entweder in einer biologischen oder in einer soziokulturellen Position verorten. Insbesondere wurde auch der Einfluss von sogenannten Sozialisationsinstanzen, wie der Lehrkräfte, vielfach diskutiert. Im vorliegenden Literaturüberblick werden zunächst Leistungs-, Interessens- und Motivationsdisparitäten zwischen Schülerinnen und Schülern in der Mathematik skizziert und Befunde zu vorhandenen Genderstereotypen, stereotypen Erwartungen und stereotypem Verhalten der Lehrkräfte erörtert. Des Weiteren wird die Rolle von impliziten Genderstereotypen erörtert und mögliche Mechanismen der Übertragung von Stereotypen dargestellt.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Oxford England: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  2. Ambady, N., Shih, M., Kim, A., & Pittinsky, T. L. (2001). Stereotype Susceptibility in Children: Effects of Identity Activation on Quantitative Performance. Psychological Science, 12(5), 385–390.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Babad, E. (1993). Pygmalion-25 years after interpersonal expectations in the classroom. In P. D. Blanck (Ed.), Studies in emotion and social interaction. Interpersonal expectations. Theory, research, and applications (pp. 125–153). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bargh, J. A. (1994). The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition. Vol. 1: Basic processes (pp. 1–40). Hillsdale, NJ England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  5. Beilock, S. L., Gunderson, E. A., Ramirez, G., & Levine, S. C. (2010). Female teachers’ math anxiety affects girls’ math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(5), 1860–1863.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910967107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bigler, R. S. (1995). The role of classification skill in moderating environmental influences on children’s gender stereotyping: A study of the functional use of gender in the classroom. Child Development, 66(4), 1072–1087.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1131799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brophy, J. (1985). Interactions of male and female students with male and female teachers. In L. C. Wilkinson & C. B. Marrett (Eds.), Educational psychology. Gender influences in classroom interaction (pp. 115–166). Orlando: Academic PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brophy, J. E. (1983). Research on the self-fulfilling prophecy and teacher expectations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(5), 631–661.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.75.5.631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Budde, J. (2008). Bildungs(miss)erfolge von Jungen und Berufswahlverhalten bei Jungen. Berlin.Google Scholar
  10. Budde, J. (2009). Mathematikunterricht und Geschlecht. Bonn, Berlin: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF)Google Scholar
  11. Burgner, D., & Hewstone, M. (1993). Young children’s causal attributions for success and failure: ‘Self-enhancing’ boys and ‘self-derogating’ girls. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 11(2), 125–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1984). Influence of gender constancy and social power on sex-linked modeling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(6), 1292–1302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Castelli, L., Zogmaister, C., & Tomelleri, S. (2009). The transmission of racial attitudes within the family. Developmental Psychology, 45(2), 586–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ceci, S. J., Williams, W. M., & Barnett, S. M. (2009). Women’s underrepresentation in science: Sociocultural and biological considerations. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 218–261.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cimpian, A., Arce, H.-M. C., Markman, E. M., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Subtle Linguistic Cues Affect Children’s Motivation. Psychological Science, 18(4), 314–316.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01896.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Correll, S. J. (2001). Gender and the career choice process: The role of biased self-assessments. American Journal of Sociology, 106(6), 1691–1730.  https://doi.org/10.1086/321299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cvencek, D., Meltzoff, A. N., & Greenwald, A. G. (2011). Math-gender stereotypes in elementary school children. Child Development, 82(3), 766–779.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01529.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Davies, P. G., Spencer, S. J., Quinn, D. M., & Gerhardstein, R. (2002). Consuming images: How television commercials that elicit stereotype threat can restrain women academically and professionally. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(12), 1615–1628.  https://doi.org/10.1177/014616702237644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Devine, P. G., Monteith, M. J., Zuwerink, J. R., & Elliot, A. J. (1991). Prejudice with and without compunction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(6), 817–830.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.6.817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dickhäuser, O., & Stiensmeier-Pelster, J. (2003). Wahrgenommene Lehrereinschätzungen und das Fähigkeitsselbstkonzept von Jungen und Mädchen in der Grundschule. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 50(2), 182–190.Google Scholar
  21. Dovidio, J. F. (2009). Racial bias: Unspoken but heard. Science, 326(5960), 1641–1642.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1184231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Duffy, J., Warren, K., & Walsh, M. (2001). Classroom Interactions: Gender of Teacher, Gender of Student, and Classroom Subject. Sex Roles, 45(9-10), 579-593.  https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1014892408105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Eccles, J. S. (2007). Where Are All the Women? Gender Differences in Participation in Physical Science and Engineering. In S. J. Ceci & W. M. Williams (Eds.), Why aren’t more women in science: Top researchers debate the evidence, pp. 199–210. Washington, DC US: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  24. Eccles, J. S., & Jacobs, J. E. (1986). Social forces shape math attitudes and performance. Signs, 11(2), 367–380.  https://doi.org/10.1086/494229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Eccles, J. S., Jacobs, J. E., & Harold, R. D. (1990). Gender Role Stereotypes, Expectancy Effects, and Parents’ Socialization of Gender Differences. Journal of Social Issues, 46(2), 183–201.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1990.tb01929.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ehrlinger, J., & Dunning, D. (2003). How chronic self-views influence (and potentially mislead) estimates of performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 5–17.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Else-Quest, N. M., Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (2010). Cross-national patterns of gender differences in mathematics: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(1), 103–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fennema, E., Peterson, P. L., Carpenter, T. P., & Lubinski, C. A. (1990). Teachers’ attributions and beliefs about girls, boys, and mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 21(1), 55–69.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00311015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Finegan, J.-A. K., Niccols, G. A., & Sitarenios, G. (1992). Relations between prenatal testosterone levels and cognitive abilities at 4 years. Developmental Psychology, 28(6), 1075–1089.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.28.6.1075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fluck, S., Harrigan, J., & Brindley, J. (2001). Children and Young Adults’ Recognition of Anxiety. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 25(2), 127-146.  https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1010701828701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Furnham, A. (1986). Response bias, social desirability and dissimulation. Personality and Individual Differences, 7(3), 385–400.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(86)90014-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 692–731.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gawronski, B., & Conrey, F. R. (2004). Der Implizite Assoziationstest als Maß automatisch aktivierter Assoziationen: Reichweite und Grenzen. Psychologische Rundschau, 55(3), 118–126.  https://doi.org/10.1037/t03782-000
  34. Gelman, S. A., Taylor, M. G., & Nguyen, S. P. (2004). Mother-child conversations about gender: Understanding the acquisition of essentialist beliefs. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 69(1).  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5834.2004.06901001.x
  35. Glock, S., Kneer, J., & Kovacs, C. (2013). Preservice teachers’ implicit attitudes toward students with and without immigration background: A pilot study. Studies in Educational Evaluation.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.09.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gonzales, P., Guzmán, J. C., Partelow, L., Pahlke, E., Jocelyn, L., Kastberg, D., & Williams, T. (2004). Highlights From the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) 2003 (NCES 2005–005). Washington, DC: U.S.: Government Printing OfficeGoogle Scholar
  37. Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102(1), 4–27.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.102.1.4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Greenwald, A. G., Banaji, M. R., Rudman, L. A., Farnham, S. D., Nosek, B. A., & Mellott, D. S. (2002). A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. Psychological Review, 109(1), 3–25.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.109.1.3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464–1480.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gunderson, E. A., Ramirez, G., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2011). The Role of Parents and Teachers in the Development of Gender-Related Math Attitudes. Sex Roles.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9996-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gur, R. C., Turetsky, B. I., Matsui, M., Yan, M., Bilker, W., Hughett, P., & Gur, R. E. (1999). Sex differences in brain gray and white matter in healthy young adults: Correlations with cognitive performance. The Journal of Neuroscience, 19(10), 4065–4072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Halpern, D. F., Benbow, C. P., Geary, D. C., Gur, R. C., Hyde, J. S., & Gernsbache, M. A. (2007). The science of sex differences in science and mathematics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8(1), 1–51.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2007.00032.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Halpern, D. F., Wai, J., & Saw, A. (2005). A Psychobiosocial Model: Why Females Are Sometimes Greater Than and Sometimes Less Than Males in Math Achievement. In A. M. Gallagher & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Gender differences in mathematics: An integrative psychological approach (pp. 48–72). New York, NY, US: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  44. Hannover, B., & Bettge, S. (1993). Mädchen und Technik. Göttingen: HogrefeGoogle Scholar
  45. Hannover, B., & Kessels, U. (2004). Self-to-prototype matching as a strategy for making academic choices. Why high school students do not like math and science. Learning and Instruction, 14(1), 51–67.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2003.10.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hechtman, S. B., & Rosenthal, R. (1991). Teacher gender and nonverbal behavior in the teaching of gender-stereotyped materials. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21(6), 446–459.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1991.tb00530.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Higgins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133–168). New York, NY US: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  48. Hill, C., Corbett, C., & St. Rose, A. (2010). Why So Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Washington, DC: AAUW.Google Scholar
  49. Hornstra, L., Denessen, E., Bakker, J., van den Bergh, L., & Voeten, M. (2010). Teacher attitudes toward dyslexia: Effects on teacher expectations and the academic achievement of students with dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43(6), 515–529.  https://doi.org/10.1037/t03873-000;
  50. Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., Ryan, M., & Frost, L. A. (1990). Gender comparisons of mathematics attitudes and affect: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 14(3), 299–324.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1990.tb00022.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hyde, J. S., Lindberg, S. M., Linn, M. C., Ellis, A. B., & Williams, C. C. (2008). Gender Similarities Characterize Math Performance. Science, 321(5888), 494–495.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1160364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Jacobs, J. E. (1991). Influence of gender stereotypes on parent and child mathematics attitudes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(4), 518–527.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.4.518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Jacobs, J. E. (2005). Twenty-five years of research on gender and ethnic differences in math and science career choices: What have we learned? New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2005(110), 85–94.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Jacobs, J. E., & Eccles, J. S. (1992). The impact of mothers’ gender-role stereotypic beliefs on mothers’ and children’s ability perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(6), 932–944.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.6.932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Jones, S. M., & Dindia, K. (2004). A Meta-Analytic Perspective on Sex Equity in the Classroom. Review of Educational Research, 74(4), 443–471.  https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074004443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Jussim, L., Eccles, J., & Madon, S. (1996). Social perception, social stereotypes, and teacher expectations: Accuracy and the quest for the powerful self-fulfilling prophecy. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 28 (pp. 281–388). San Diego, CA US: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  57. Keller, C. (1997). Geschlechterdifferenzen: Trägt die Schule dazu bei? In U. Moser, E. Ramseier, C. Keller, & M. Huber (Eds.), Schule auf dem Prüfstand. Eine Evaluation der Sekundarstufe I auf der Grundlage der „Third international mathematics and science study“ (1st ed., pp. 137–179). Chur, Zürich: Rüegger.Google Scholar
  58. Keller, C. (2001). Effect of teachers’ stereotyping on students’ stereotyping of mathematics as a male domain. The Journal of Social Psychology, 141(2), 165–173.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540109600544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Keller, J., & Molix, L. (2008). When women can’t do math: The interplay of self-construal, group identification, and stereotypic performance standards. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(2), 437–444.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2007.01.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Kelly, A., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2013). Implicit attitudes towards children with autism versus normally developing children as predictors of professional burnout and psychopathology. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(1), 17–28.  https://doi.org/10.1037/t05514-000;
  61. Kiefer, A. K., & Sekaquaptewa, D. (2007a). Implicit stereotypes and women’s math performance: How implicit gender-math stereotypes influence women’s susceptibility to stereotype threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(5), 825–832.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2006.08.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Kiefer, A. K., & Sekaquaptewa, D. (2007b). Implicit Stereotypes, Gender Identification, and Math-Related Outcomes: A Prospective Study of Female College Students. Psychological Science, 18(1), 13–18.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01841.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Kompetenzzentrum Technik-Diversity-Chancengleichheit e. V. (2014). Daten + Fakten. URL: www.kompetenzz.de (Stand 07.11.2014).
  64. Lane, K. A. (2012). Being narrow while being broad: The importance of construct specificity and theoretical generality. Sex Roles, 66(3-4), 167–174.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0077-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Lane, K. A., Goh, J. X., & Driver-Linn, E. (2012). Implicit science stereotypes mediate the relationship between gender and academic participation. Sex Roles, 66(3-4), 220–234.  https://doi.org/10.1037/t03782-000
  66. Leinhardt, G., Seewald, A. M., & Engel, M. (1979). Learning what’s taught: Sex differences in instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(4), 432–439.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.71.4.432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Levins, T., Bornholt, L., & Lennon, B. (2005). Teachers’ experience, attitudes, feelings and behavioural intentions towards children with special educational needs. Social Psychology of Education, 8(3), 329–343.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-005-3020-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Li, Q. (1999). Teachers’ beliefs and gender differences in mathematics: a review. Educational Research, 41(1), 63–76.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0013188990410106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Ma, X., & Kishor, N. (1997). Attitude toward self, social factors, and achievement in mathematics: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychology Review, 9(2), 89–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Madon, S., Jussim, L., & Eccles, J. (1997). In search of the powerful self-fulfilling prophecy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(4), 791–809.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022- 3514.72.4.791
  71. McIntyre, R. B., Lord, C. G., Gresky, D. M., Eyck, L. L. ten, Jay Frye, G. D., & Bond, C. F. (2005). A Social Impact Trend in the Effects of Role Models on Alleviating Women’s Mathematics Stereotype Threat. Current Research in Social Psychology, 10(9).Google Scholar
  72. McKown, C., & Weinstein, R. S. (2008). Teacher expectations, classroom context, and the achievement gap. Journal of School Psychology, 46(3), 235–261.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2007.05.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Merton, R. K. (1948). The self-fulfilling prophecy. The Antioch Review, 193–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2012). Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(41), 16474–16479.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211286109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Muzzatti, B., & Agnoli, F. (2007). Gender and mathematics: Attitudes and stereotype threat susceptibility in Italian children. Developmental Psychology, 43(3), 747–759.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.3.747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84(3), 231–259.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.84.3.231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration web site. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6(1), 101–115.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.6.1.101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). Math = male, me = female, therefore math ≠ me. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(1), 44–59.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.1.44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Nosek, B. A., & Smyth, F. L. (2011). Implicit social cognitions predict sex differences in math engagement and achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 48(5), 1125–1156.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831211410683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Sriram, N., Lindner, N. M., Devos, T., Ayala, A., … Greenwald, A. G. (2009). National differences in gender-science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(26), 10593–10597.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0809921106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Nürnberger, M., Nerb, J., Schmitz, F., Keller, J. & Sütterlin, S. (2016). Implicit Gender Stereotypes and Essentialist Beliefs Predict Preservice Teachers’ Tracking Recommendations. The Journal of Experimental Education, 84(1), 152-174,  https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2015.1027807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Patterson, M. M., & Bigler, R. S. (2006). Preschool Children’s Attention to Environmental Messages About Groups: Social Categorization and the Origins of Intergroup Bias. Child Development, 77(4), 847–860.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00906.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Ramm, M., & Bargel, T. (2005). Frauen im Studium. Langzeitstudie 1983-2004. Bonn: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung.Google Scholar
  84. Robinson, J. P., & Lubienski, S. T. (2011). The Development of Gender Achievement Gaps in Mathematics and Reading During Elementary and Middle School: Examining Direct Cognitive Assessments and Teacher Ratings. American Educational Research Journal, 48(2), 268–302.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831210372249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom: Teacher expectation and pupils’ intellectual development. New York, NY US: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  86. Rustemeyer, R. (1999). Geschlechtstypische Erwartungen zukünftiger Lehrkräfte bezügl. des Unterrichtsfaches Mathematik und korrespondierende (Selbst-)Einschätzungen von Schülerinnen und Schülern. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 46(3), 187–200.Google Scholar
  87. Sadker, M., Sadker, D., & Klein, S. (1991). The issue of gender in elementary and secondary education. Review of Research in Education, (17), 269–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Sax, L. J. (1994). Predicting gender and major-field differences in mathematical self-concept during college. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 1(4), 291–307.  https://doi.org/10.1615/jwomenminorscieneng.v1.i4.30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Schmader, T., Johns, M., & Barquissau, M. (2004). The Costs of Accepting Gender Differences: The Role of Stereotype Endorsement in Women’s Experience in the Math Domain. Sex Roles, 50(11/12), 835–850.  https://doi.org/10.1023/b:sers.0000029101.74557.a0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Schraudner, M., & Best, K. (2014). Wer macht wirklich MINT? Wissenschaftskarrieren in der retrospektiven Verlaufsanalyse. Forschung & Lehre, 10, 826–827.Google Scholar
  91. Shapiro, J. R., & Williams, A. M. (2012). The role of stereotype threats in undermining girls’ and women’s performance and interest in STEM fields. Sex Roles, 66(3-4), 175–183.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0051-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Shih, M., Pittinsky, T. L., & Ambady, N. (1999). Stereotype susceptibility: Identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance. Psychological Science, 10(1), 80–83.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype Threat and Women’s Math Performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35(1), 4–28.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1998.1373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Stangor, C. (2009). The Study of Stereotyping, Prejudice, and Discrimination Within Social Psychology: A Quick History of Theory and Research. In T. D. Nelson (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 1–22). New York, NY US: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  95. Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 797–811.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Steele, J. (2003). Children’s Gender Stereotypes About Math: The Role of Stereotype Stratification. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(12), 2587–2606.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb02782.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Steffens, M. C., & Jelenec, P. (2011). Separating implicit gender stereotypes regarding math and language: Implicit ability stereotypes are self-serving for boys and men, but not for girls and women. Sex Roles, 64(5-6), 324–335.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9924-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Steffens, M. C., Jelenec, P., & Noack, P. (2010). On the leaky math pipeline: Comparing implicit math-gender stereotypes and math withdrawal in female and male children and adolescents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 947–963.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Strack, F. (1994). Response processes in social judgment. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition. Vol. 1: Basic processes (pp. 287–322). Hillsdale, NJ England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  100. Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and Impulsive Determinants of Social Behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(3), 220–247.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Stumpf, H., & Klieme, E. (1989). Sex-related differences in spatial ability: More evidence for convergence. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 69(3, Pt 1), 915–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Tiedemann, J. (1995). Geschlechtstypische Erwartungen von Lehrkräften im Mathematikunterricht der Grundschule. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie/German Journal of Educational Psychology, 9(3-4), 153–161.Google Scholar
  103. Tiedemann, J. (2000a). Gender-related beliefs of teachers in elementary school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41(2), 191–207.  https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1003953801526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Tiedemann, J. (2000b). Parents’ gender stereotypes and teachers’ beliefs as predictors of children’s concept of their mathematical ability in elementary school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 144–151.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.1.144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Tiedemann, J. (2002). Teachers’ gender stereotypes as determinants of teacher perceptions in elementary school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 50(1), 49–62.  https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1020518104346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Tiedemann, J., & Faber, G. (1994). Mädchen und Grundschulmathematik: Ergebnisse einer vierjährigen Längsschnittuntersuchung zu ausgewählten geschlechtsbezogenen Unterschieden in der Leistungsentwicklung. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 26(2), 101–111.Google Scholar
  107. U.S. Department of Education. (2012). The Condition of Education 2012: National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
  108. van den Bergh, L., Denessen, E., Hornstra, L., Voeten, M., & Holland, R. W. (2010). The implicit prejudiced attitudes of teachers: Relations to teacher expectations and the ethnic achievement gap. American Educational Research Journal, 47(2), 497–527.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209353594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Vezzali, L., Giovannini, D., & Capozza, D. (2012). Social antecedents of children’s implicit prejudice: Direct contact, extended contact, explicit and implicit teachers’ prejudice. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(5), 569–581.  https://doi.org/10.1037/t03782-000;
  110. Walther, G., Schwippert, K., Lankes, E.-M., & Stubbe, T. C. (2008). Können Mädchen doch rechnen? Vertiefende Analysen zu Geschlechtsdifferenzen im Bereich Mathematik auf Basis der Internationalen Grundschul-Lese-Untersuchung IGLU. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 11(1), 30–46.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-008-0002-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Weisbuch, M., Pauker, K., & Ambady, N. (2009). The subtle transmission of race bias via televised nonverbal behavior. Science, 326(5960), 1711–1714. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1178358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Wenninger, G. (. (2000). Lexikon der Psychologie: In fünf Bänden. Heidelberg: Spektrum.Google Scholar
  113. Yee, D. K., & Eccles, J. S. (1988). Parent perceptions and attributions for children’s math achievement. Sex Roles, 19(5-6), 317–333.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00289840CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Miriam Nürnberger
    • 1
  • Josef Nerb
    • 1
  1. 1.Pädagogische Hochschule FreiburgFreiburgDeutschland

Personalised recommendations