Advertisement

Videobasierte Instrumente zur Testung und videobasierte Trainings zur Förderung von Kompetenzen bei Lehrkräften

  • Anna F. Altmann
  • Celia Kändler
Chapter

Zusammenfassung

In diesem Kapitel soll die Verwendung von Videomethoden in der empirischen Bildungsforschung zusammengetragen werden. Dabei lässt sich die Verwendung von Videos in zwei Bereiche einteilen: Videos und Videovignetten als Testinstrument und Videos zum Zwecke der Aus- und Fortbildung von Lehrkräften.

Im ersten Teilkapitel werden Studien vorgestellt, die sich mit unterschiedlichen Herangehensweisen der videobasierten Testung von Kompetenzen beschäftigen. Diese Studien haben z. B. einen Fokus auf die reine Entwicklung von videobasierten Testinstrumenten oder auf das Erfassen von spezifischen Kompetenzen und deren Veränderungsprozesse oder auf die Gütekriterien der Testinstrumente.

Im zweiten Teilkapitel zum Thema Videos als Trainingsmethode werden zunächst Forschungsbefunde zu unterschiedlichen Arten von Videomaterial, welche verschiedenen Lernzielen dienlich sind, vorgestellt. Anschließend werden Studien zusammenfassend dargestellt, um den aktuellen Forschungsstand zu videobasierten Trainingskonzepten zu skizzieren. Es wird dabei der Frage nachgegangen, wie sich Videos gezielt in der Lehrerbildung einsetzen lassen.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Admiraal, W., Hoeksma, M., van de Kamp, M.-T., & van Duin, G. (2011). Assessment of teacher competence using video portfolios: Reliability, construct validity, and consequential validity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(6), 1019–1028.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.04.002Google Scholar
  2. Altmann, A. F., Herppich, S., Wittwer, W., & Nückles, M. (2016). Rose-colored glasses or red pen? Preservice and inservice teachers’ interpretation of formative assessment strategies in a teacher-student-dialogue. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  3. Bakker, M. E. J., Roelofs, E. C., Beijaard, D., Sanders, P. F., Tigelaar, D. E. H., & Verloop, N. (2011). Video portfolios. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(2-3), 123–133.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.04.007Google Scholar
  4. Ball, D. L. & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In G. Sykes, & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3-32). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  5. Bannink, A. (2009). How to capture growth? – Video narratives as an instrument for assessment in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(2), 244–250.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.11.009Google Scholar
  6. Beck, E., Baer, M., Guldimann, T., Bischoff, S., Brühwiler, C., Müller, P., & Vogt, F. (2008). Adaptive Lehrkompetenz. Analyse und Struktur, Veränderung und Wirkung handlungssteuernden Lehrerwissens. (D. H. Rost, Ed.). Münster: Waxmann. Retrieved from http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=VVKKAwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Adaptive+Lehrkompetenz&ots=cHqSXMGdAm&sig=Z4Nu5IQtIl-8YRMT0I7Osr5JrDQ
  7. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1985). Cognitive coping strategies and the problem of „inert knowledge“. In S. F. Chipman, J. W. Segal, & R. Glaser (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills: Research and open questions (Vol. 2, pp. 65-80). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  8. Berliner, D. C. (1991). Perceptions of student behavior as a function of expertise. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 26(1), 1-8.Google Scholar
  9. Biaggi, S., Krammer, K. & Hugener, I. (2013). Vorgehen zur Förderung der Analysekompetenz in der Lehrerbildung mit Hilfe von Unterrichtsvideos – Erfahrungen aus dem ersten Studienjahr. SEMINAR, 19 (2), 26-34.Google Scholar
  10. Blomberg, G., Stürmer, K., & Seidel, T. (2011a). How pre-service teachers observe teaching on video: Effects of viewers’ teaching subjects and the subject of the video. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(7), 1131–1140.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.04.008Google Scholar
  11. Blomberg, G., Stürmer, K., & Seidel, T. (2011b). How pre-service teachers observe teaching on video: Effects of viewers’ teaching subjects and the subject of the video. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(7), 1131–1140.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.04.008Google Scholar
  12. Blomberg, G., Renkl, A., Sherin, M. G., Borko, H., & Seidel, T. (2013). Five research-based heuristics for using video in pre-service teacher education. Journal for Educational Research Online, 5(1), 90–114.Google Scholar
  13. Blomberg, G., Stürmer, K., & Seidel, T. (2011). How pre-service teachers observe teaching on video: Effects of viewers’ teaching subjects and the subject of the video. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(7), 1131-1140.Google Scholar
  14. Borko, H. (2004). Professional Development and Teacher Learning: Mapping the Terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3-15.Google Scholar
  15. Borko, H., Jacobs, J., Eiteljorg, E., & Pittman, M. E. (2008). Video as a tool for fostering productive discussions in mathematics professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 417-436.Google Scholar
  16. Brouwer, N. (April 2011). Imaging teacher learning: A literature review on the use of digital video for preservice teacher education and professional development. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American educational research association, New Orleans.Google Scholar
  17. Brophy, J. (Ed.) (2004). Advances in research on teaching: Using video in teacher education (Vol. 10). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  18. Butler, M., Lee, S., & Tippins, D. (2006). Case-based methodology as an instructional strategy for understanding diversity: Preservice teachers’ perceptions. Multicultural Education, 13(3), 20-6.Google Scholar
  19. Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Peterson, P. L., Chiang, C. P., & Loef, M. (1989). Using knowledge of children’s mathematics thinking in classroom teaching. An experimental study. American Educational Research Journal, 4, 499-531.Google Scholar
  20. Chi, M. T. H. (1996). Constructing self-explanations and scaffolded explanations in tutoring. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10(7), 33–49. Retrieved from http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199611)10:7<33::AID-ACP436>3.0.CO;2-EGoogle Scholar
  21. Chi, M. T. H., Siler, S. A., Jeong, H., Yamauchi, T., & Hausmann, R. (2001). Learning from human tutoring. Cognitive Science, 25(4), 471–533. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0364021301000441Google Scholar
  22. Clarke, D. J., Mesiti, C., O’Keefe, C., Xu, L. H., Jablonka, E., & Mok, I. A. C. (2008). Addressing the challenge of legitimate international comparisons of classroom practice. International Journal of Educational Research, 46(5), 280-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2007.10.009Google Scholar
  23. Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Assessing teacher education: The usefulness of multiple measures for assessing program outcomes. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(2), 120-138.Google Scholar
  24. Elliott, R., & Kazemi, E. (2007, October). Researching mathematics leader learning: Investigating the mediation of math knowledge for teaching on leaders’ collective work in mathematics. In T. de Silva Lamberg, & L. R. Wiest (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty ninth annual meeting North American chapter of the International Group of the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Lake Tahoe, NV: University of Nevada, Reno.Google Scholar
  25. Fishman, B. J., Marx, R. W, Best, S., & Tal, R. T. (2003). Linking teacher and student learning to improve professional development in systemic reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 643-658.Google Scholar
  26. Gold, B., Förster, S., & Holodynski, M. (2013). Evaluation eines videobasierten Trainingsseminars zur Förderung der professionellen Wahrnehmung von Klassenführung im Grundschulunterricht. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 27(3), 141-155.Google Scholar
  27. Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606-633.Google Scholar
  28. Greeno, J. G. (2003). Situative research relevant to standards for school mathematics. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin, & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to Principles and Standards for School mathematics (pp. 304-332). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  29. Grossman, P., Wineburg, S., & Woolworth, S. (2001). Toward a theory of teacher community. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 942-1012.Google Scholar
  30. Hellmann, K., & Nückles, M. (2013). Expert blind spot in pre-service and in-service mathematics teachers: Task design moderates overestimation of novices’ performance. In M. Knauff, M. Pauen, N.Sebanz, & I. Wachsmuth (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2518-2523). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
  31. Helmke, A. (2009). Unterrichtsqualität und Lehrerprofessionalität: Diagnose, Evaluation und Verbesserung des Unterrichts. Seelze-Velber: Kallmeyer.Google Scholar
  32. Helmke, A., Hosenfeld, I., & Schrader, F.-W. (2004). Vergleichsarbeiten als Instrument zur Verbesserung der Diagnosekompetenz von Lehrkräften. In R. Arnold & C. Griese (Eds.), Schulleitung und Schulentwicklung (pp. 119-144). Hohengehren: Schneider.Google Scholar
  33. Helmke, T., Helmke, A., Schrader, F.-W., Wagner, W., Nold, G., & Schröder, K. (2008). Die Videostudie des Englischunterrichts. In DESI-Konsortium (Ed.), Unterricht und Kompetenzerwerb in Deutsch und Englisch. Ergebnisse der DESI-Studie. (pp. 345–363). Weinheim: Beltz.Google Scholar
  34. Herppich, S., Wittwer, J., Nückles, M., & Renkl, A. (2014). Addressing Knowledge Deficits in Tutoring and the Role of Teaching Experience: Benefits for Learning and Summative Assessment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(2), 1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036076Google Scholar
  35. Janík, T., Janikova, M., Knecht, P., Kubiatko, M., Najvar, P., Najvarová, V., & Sebestová, S. (2009). Exploring different ways of using video in teaching education: Examples from CPV video web. In T., Janik, & T., Seidel (Hrsg.), The power of video studies in investigating teaching and learning in the classroom (S. 207-224). Münster, Westf: Waxmann.Google Scholar
  36. Jay, J. (2004). Variations on the use of cases in social work and teacher education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(1), 35-52.Google Scholar
  37. Kaendler, C., Wiedmann, M., Leuders, T., Rummel, N., & Spada, H. (2016). Monitoring student interaction during collaborative learning: Design and evaluation of a training program for perservice teachers. Manuscript accepted for publication.Google Scholar
  38. Kersting, N. (2008). Using Video Clips of Mathematics Classroom Instruction as Item Prompts to Measure Teachers’ Knowledge of Teaching Mathematics. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68(5), 845–861.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164407313369Google Scholar
  39. Kersting, N. B., Givvin, K. B., Sotelo, F. L., & Stigler, J. W. (2009). Teachers’ analyses of classroom video predict student learning of mathematics: Further explorations of a novel measure of teacher knowledge. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1-2), 172–181.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109347875Google Scholar
  40. Kersting, N. B., Givvin, K. B., Thompson, B. J., Santagata, R., & Stigler, J. W. (2012). Measuring Usable Knowledge: Teachers’ Analyses of Mathematics Classroom Videos Predict Teaching Quality and Student Learning. American Educational Research Journal, 49(3), 568–589.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831212437853Google Scholar
  41. Kleinknecht, M., & Schneider, J. (2013). What do teachers think and how do they feel when they analyze videos of themselves teaching and of other teachers teaching? Teaching and Teacher Education, 33, 13-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.02.002Google Scholar
  42. Klieme, E., & Hartig, J. (2008). Kompetenzkonzepte in den Sozialwissenschaften und im erziehungswissenschaftlichen Diskurs. In M. Prenzel, I. Gogolin, & H.-H. Krüger (Hrsg.), Kompetenzdiagnostik, Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft – Sonderheft, Band 8/2007 (S. 11-29). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  43. Klieme, E., & Leutner, D. (2006). Kompetenzmodelle zur Erfassung individueller Lernergebnisse und zur Bilanzierung von Bildungsprozessen: Beschreibung eines neu eingerichteten Schwerpunktprogramms der DFG [Competency models for measuring individual learning and for evaluating education processes: description of a newly-established Priority Program of the DFG]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 52(6), 876-903.Google Scholar
  44. Knievel, I., Lindmeier, A., & Heinze, A. (2014). Erfassung aktionsbezogener Kompetenzen von Mathematiklehrkräften in der Grundschule mit videobasierten Items. In J. Roth & J. Ames (Eds.), Beiträge zum Mathematikunterricht 2014 (Vol. 2014, pp. 623–626). Münster: WTMVertag.Google Scholar
  45. Koc, Y., Peker, D., & Osmanoglu, A. (2009). Supporting teacher professional development through online video case study discussions: An assemblage of preservice and inservice teachers and the case teacher. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(8), 1158-1168.Google Scholar
  46. Koehler, M. J., Yadav, A., Phillips, M. M., & Cavazos-Kottke, S. C. (2005). What is video good for? Examining how media and story genre interact. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 14(3), 249e272.Google Scholar
  47. Koeppen, K., Hartig, J., Klieme, E., & Leutner, D. (2008). Current issues in competence modeling and assessment. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 216(2), 61–73.  https://doi.org/10.1027/0044-3409.216.2.61Google Scholar
  48. Korthagen, F. A. J., & Kessels, J. P. A. M. (1999). Linking theory and practice: Changing the pedagogy of teacher education. Educational Researcher, 28(4), 4-17.Google Scholar
  49. König, J., Blömeke, S., Klein, P., Suhl, U., Busse, A., & Kaiser, G. (2014). Is teachers’ general pedagogical knowledge a premise for noticing and interpreting classroom situations? A videobased assessment approach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 38, 76–88.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.11.004Google Scholar
  50. König, J., Blomeke, S., Paine, L., Schmidt, W. H., & Hsieh, F.-J. (2011). General Pedagogical Knowledge of Future Middle School Teachers: On the Complex Ecology of Teacher Education in the United States, Germany, and Taiwan. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(2), 188–201.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487110388664Google Scholar
  51. Krammer, K., Hugener, I. & Biaggi, S. (2012). Unterrichtsvideos als Medium des beruflichen Lernens in der Lehrerinnen- und Lehrerbildung – Formen und Erfahrungen. Beiträge zur Lehrerbildung, 261-272.Google Scholar
  52. Krammer, K., Schnetzler, C.L., Ratzka, N., Reusser, K., Pauli, C., Lipowsky, F., & Klieme, E. (2008). Lernen mit Unterrichtsvideos: Konzeption und Ergebnisse eines netzgestützten Weiterbildungsprojekts mit Mathematiklehrpersonen aus Deutschland und der Schweiz. Beiträge zur Lehrerbildung, 26(2), 178-197.Google Scholar
  53. Kucan, L., Palincsar, A. S., Khasnabis, D., & Chang, C.-I. (2009). The Video Viewing Task: A source of information for assessing and addressing teacher understanding of text-based discussion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(3), 415–423.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.09.003Google Scholar
  54. Kunter, M., Baumert, J., Blum, W., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., Neubrand, M., & SpringerLink. (2013). Cognitive Activation in the Mathematics Classroom and Professional Competence of Teachers Results from the COACTIV Project. Mathematics Teacher Education ;8 (p. VI, 378 p. 31 illus.). Springer US : Imprint: Springer. Langfeldt, H. P. (2006). Psychologie für die Schule. Beltz.Google Scholar
  55. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Lindmeier, A. (2011). Modeling and measuring knowledge and competencies of teachers. A threefold domain-specific structure model for Mathematics. Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
  57. Lundeberg, M. A. (1999). Discovering teaching and learning through cases. In M. A. Lundeberg, B. B. Levin, & H. L. Harrington (Eds.), Who learns what from cases and how? The research base for teaching and learning with cases (pp. 3-24). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  58. Masingila, J. O., & Doerr, H. M. (2002). Understanding pre-service teachers’ emerging practices through their analyses of a multimedia case study of practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5, 235-263.Google Scholar
  59. Mayo, J. A. (2002). Case-based instruction: A technique for increasing conceptual application in introductory psychology. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 15(1), 65-74.Google Scholar
  60. Mayo, J. A. (2004). Using case-based instruction to bridge the gap between theory and practice in psychology of adjustment. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 17(2), 137-146.Google Scholar
  61. Mumme, J., & Seago, N. (2003, April). Examining teachers’ development in representing and conceptualizing linear relationships within teaching practice. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
  62. Nelson, T. H. (2009). Teachers’ collaborative inquiry and professional growth: Should we be optimistic? Science Education, 93, 548-580.Google Scholar
  63. Oser, F., Heinzer, S. & Salzmann, P. (2010). Die Messung der Qualität von professionellen Kompetenzprofilen von Lehrpersonen mit Hilfe der Einschätzung von Filmvignetten. Chancen und Grenzen des advokatorischen Ansatzes. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 38(1), 5-28.Google Scholar
  64. Pianta, R. C., & Hambre, B. K. (2009). Conceptualization, measurement, and improvement of classroom processes: standardized observation can leverage capacity. Educational Researcher, 38(2), 109–119.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x09332374Google Scholar
  65. Putnam, R. (1987). Structuring and adjusting content for students: A study of live and simulated tutoring of addition. American Educational Research Journal, 24(1), 13–48. Retrieved from http://aer.sagepub.com/content/24/1/13.shortGoogle Scholar
  66. Reeve, J. (2009). Why Teachers Adopt a Controlling Motivating Style Toward Students and How They Can Become More Autonomy Supportive. Educational Psychologist, 44(3), 159–175.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520903028990Google Scholar
  67. Renkl, A., Mandl, H., & Gruber, H. (1996). Inert knowledge: Analyses and remedies. Educational Psychologist, 31, 115-121.Google Scholar
  68. Reusser, K. (2005). Situiertes Lernen mit Unterrichtsvideos. Journal für Lehrerinnen- und Lehrerbildung, 2, 8-18.Google Scholar
  69. Roscoe, R. D., & Chi, M. T. H. (2007). Understanding Tutor Learning: Knowledge-Building and Knowledge-Telling in Peer Tutors’ Explanations and Questions. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 534–574.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307309920Google Scholar
  70. Ruiz-Primo, M. A. (2011). Informal formative assessment: The role of instructional dialogues in assessing students’ learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 15–24.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.04.003Google Scholar
  71. Sabers, D. S., Cushing, K. S., & Berliner, D. C. (1991). Difference among teachers in a task characterized by simultaneity, multidimensionality, and immediacy. American Educational Research Journal, 28(1), 63-88.Google Scholar
  72. Santagata, R., & Guarino, J. (2011). Using video to teach future teachers to learn from teaching. ZDM Mathematics Education, 43(1), 133-145.Google Scholar
  73. Santagata, R., Zannoni, C., & Stigler, J. (2007). The role of lesson analysis in preservice teacher education: An empirical investigation of teacher learning from a virtual video-based field experience. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10(2), 123-140. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10857-007-9029-9Google Scholar
  74. Seidel, T., Blomberg, G., & Renkl, A. (2013). Instructional strategies for using video in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 34, 56-65.Google Scholar
  75. Seidel, T., Prenzel, M., Schwindt, K., Stürmer, K., Blomberg, G., & Kobarg, M. (2009). LUV and observe: Two projects using video to diagnose teachers’ competence. In T. Janík & T. Seidel (Eds.), The power of video studies in investigating teaching and learning in the classroom (pp. 243–258). Münster: Waxman. Retrieved from http://books.google.de/books?hl=de&lr=&id=pbUTAQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA8&dq=the+power+of+video+studies&ots=fYIqjQ7NXR&sig=Mjzq0OPbJ6fwe7u3TH1IrUcUJho
  76. Seidel, T., Stürmer, K., Blomberg, G., Kobarg, M., & Schwindt, K. (2011). Teacher learning from analysis of videotaped classroom situations. Does it make a difference whether teachers observe their own teaching or that of others? Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 259-267.Google Scholar
  77. Sherin, M. G. (2001). Developing a professional vision of classroom events. In T. Wood, B. S. Nelson, & J. Warfield (Eds.), Beyond classical pedagogy: Teaching elementary school mathematics (pp. 75-93). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  78. Sherin, M. G. (2002). When teaching becomes learning. Cognition and Instruction, 20(2), 119-150.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2002_1.Google Scholar
  79. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher 15(2), 4-14.Google Scholar
  80. Shulman, L. S. (1992). Toward a pedagogy of cases. In J. H. Shulman (Ed.), Case methods in teacher education (pp. 1-30). New York & London: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  81. Spinath, B. (2005). Akkuratheit der Einschätzung von Schülermerkmalen durch Lehrer und das Konstrukt der diagnostischen Kompetenz. Zeitschrift Für Pädagogische Psychologie, 19(1-2), 85–95.  https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652.19.1.85
  82. Tillema, H., & Smith, K. (2007). Portfolio appraisal: In search of criteria. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(4), 442-456.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.12.005Google Scholar
  83. Tribelhorn, T. (2007). Situiertes Lernen in der Weiterbildung. Konzeption praxis- und problemorientierter Kurse für Hochschullehrende. In S. Wehr, & H. Ertel (Hrsg.), Aufbruch in der Hochschullehre. Kompetenzen und Lernende im Zentrum. Beiträge aus der hochschuldidaktischen Praxis (S. 31-75). Bern: Haupt Verlag.Google Scholar
  84. Tripp, T. R., & Rich, P. J. (2012). The influence of video analysis on the process of teacher change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(5), 728-739.Google Scholar
  85. Van Es, E. A. (2010). A framework for facilitating productive discussions in video clubs. Educational Technology Magazine, L(1), 8-12.Google Scholar
  86. Van Es, E. A. (2012). Examining the development of a teacher learning community: The case of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(2), 182-192.Google Scholar
  87. Van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2002). Learning to notice: Scaffolding new teachers’ interpretations of classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(4), 571–596.Google Scholar
  88. Van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2008). Mathematics teachers „learning to notice“ in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 244-276.Google Scholar
  89. Wahl, D. (1995). Grundkonzeption. In D. Wahl, W. Wölfing, G. Rapp & D. Heger (Hrsg.), Erwachsenenbildung konkretes mehrphasiges Dozententraining. Eine neue Form erwachsendidaktischer Ausbildung von Referenten und Dozenten (4. Aufl., S. 58-103). Weinheim: Dt. Studien-Verlag.Google Scholar
  90. Weinert, F. E. (1996). Lerntheorien und Instruktionsmodelle. In F. E. Weinert (Hrsg.), Enzyklopädie der Psychologie, Bd. 2. Psychologie des Lernens und der Instruktion (S. 1–48). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  91. Weinert, F. E. (2001). Concept of competence: A conceptual clarification. In D. S. Rychen & L. H. Salga, (Eds.), Defining and selecting key competencies (pp. 45–65). Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber Publishing.Google Scholar
  92. Wiens, P. D., Hessberg, K., LoCasale-Crouch, J., & DeCoster, J. (2013). Using a standardized video-based assessment in a university teacher education program to examine preservice teachers knowledge related to effective teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 33, 24–33.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.01.010Google Scholar
  93. Zhang, M., Lundeberg, M. A., Koehler, M. J., & Eberhardt, J. (2011). Understanding affordances and challenges of three types of video for teacher professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 454-462.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna F. Altmann
    • 1
  • Celia Kändler
    • 1
  1. 1.Albert-Ludwigs-Universität FreiburgFreiburgDeutschland

Personalised recommendations