Advertisement

The Practice of Digital Religion

  • Heidi A. CampbellEmail author
  • Forrest Rule
Chapter
  • 151 Downloads

Abstract

The study of digital religion examines the influence religion and new media have upon one another. In recent decades, scholars of media and religion have paid increasing attention to the religious uses of new media. As the Internet has become embedded in our everyday lives, digital media increasingly informs the practice of religion, the things adherents do to enact their beliefs and express religious identity, the things adherents do to demonstrate their affiliation with a religion or religious community. This chapter examines the ways religious practice occurs within digital environments through the lens of religious ritual online. By considering the particular meanings and ways rituals are enacted through media, we identify how religious ritual highlights some of the common forms of religious practice found online.

Keywords

Digital religion Digital media Internet Online religion Religion online Ritual Spiritual network Worship space Missionary tool 

References

  1. Bell, Mark, and Taylor C. Boas, 2003. Falun Gong and the Internet: Evangelism, community, and struggle for survival. Nova Religio: The Journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions 6(2): 277–293.Google Scholar
  2. Campbell, Heidi. 2005. Spiritualising the Internet: Uncovering discourses and narratives of religious Internet usage. Heidelberg Journal of Religions on the Internet 01:1. http://www.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/archiv/5824. Accessed 21.08.2016.
  3. Campbell, Heidi. 2013. Introduction: The rise of the study of digital religion. In Digital religion, ed. Heidi Campbell, 1–22. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Cheong, Pauline Hope, and Charles Ess. 2012. Twitter of faith: Understanding social media networking and microblogging rituals as religious practices. In Digital religion, social media and culture: Perspectives, practices, futures, ed. Pauline Hope Cheong, Peter Fischer-Nielsen, Stephan Gelfgren, and Charles Ess, 191–206. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  5. Decker, Adrienne. 2014. Dashomancy, or curating the magical experience: Remediations of pagan spirituality and sacred space. Master’s project. Eugene: Randall V. Mills Archives of Northwest Folklore, University of Oregon.Google Scholar
  6. Durkheim, Emile. 1995. The elementary forms of religious life. New York: Free Press Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. Grieve, Gregory. 2010. Virtually embodying the field: Silent online meditation, immersion, and the Cardean ethnographic method. Heidelberg Journal of Religions on the Internet 4(1). http://www.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/archiv/11296. Accessed 21.08.2016.
  8. Grieve, Gregory, and Kevin Heston. 2011. Finding liquid salvation: Using the Cardean ethnographic method to document Second Life residents and religious cloud communities. In Virtual worlds, second life, and metaverse platforms: New communication and identity paradigms, ed. Nelson Zagalo, Leonel Morgado and Ana Boa-Ventura. Hershey: IGI Global.Google Scholar
  9. Gregory Price Grieve, and Daniel Veidlinger (eds.). 2015. Buddhism, the Internet, and digital media: The pixel in the lotus. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Grimes, Ronald. 2002. Ritual and the media. In Practicing religion in the age of the media: Explorations in media, religion and culture, ed. Stewart Hoover and Lynn Schofield Clark, 219–234. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Helland, Christopher. 2013. Ritual. In Digital religion, ed. Heidi Campbell, 25–41. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Homans, George. 1941. Anxiety and ritual: The theories of Malinowski and Radcliffe-Brown. American Anthropologist 43: 164–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hutchings, Tim. 2013. Considering religious community through online churches. In Digital religion, ed. Heidi Campbell, 164–172. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Jacobs, Stephen. 2007. Virtually sacred: The performance of asynchronous cyber‐rituals in online spaces. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication 12(3): 1103–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lövheim, Mia. 2004. Young people, religious identity and the Internet. In Religion online: finding faith on the Internet, ed. Lorne Dawson and Douglas Cowan, 59–73. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  16. MacWilliams, Marc. 2004. Virtual pilgrimage to Ireland’s Croagh Patrick. In Religion online: Finding faith on the Internet, ed. Lorne Dawson and Douglas Cowan, 223–238. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  17. O’Leary, Stephen. 1996. Cyberspace as sacred space: Communicating religion on computer networks. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 64: 781–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Smart, Ninian. 1996. Dimensions of the sacred: An anatomy of the world’s beliefs. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  19. Stamper, Amber. 2013. Witnessing the web: The rhetoric of American e-vangelism and persuasion online Theses and Dissertations, English. Lexington: University of Kentucky.Google Scholar
  20. Turner, Victor. 1972. Symbols in African ritual. Science 179: 1100–1105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Zaleski, Jeff. 1997. The soul of cyberspace: How technology is changing our spiritual lives. San Francisco: Harper.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of CommunicationTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations