Advertisement

Digital Piracy

  • Joe KaraganisEmail author
Chapter
  • 123 Downloads

Abstract

The growth of digital culture has been inseparable from the growth of capacities to copy and share its products. Because cultural markets have tended to be organized around legal and practical obstacles to copying (notably via copyright law), this growth has been accompanied by continuous debate about the implications and permissible scope of those capacities, and by efforts to draw coherent and enforceable lines around unauthorized practices or ‘piracy’. This contribution outlines what we have learned about this emergent culture of copying over the past two decades, its interaction with media markets and copyright policy debates, and its evolution as cultural business models incorporate the changes in use and expectations enabled by the new technologies.

Keywords

Copyright Piracy File sharing Intellectual property Digital culture 

References

  1. GfK Panel Services Deutschland. 2010. Brenner-Studie 2010. Commissioned by IFPI. http://www.musikindustrie.de/uploads/media/Brennerstudie_2010_Presseversion_FINAL.pdf. Accessed 15 Aug 2016.
  2. GfK Panel Services Deutschland. 2011. Survey on Digital Content Usage (DCN Survey) 2011. Commissioned by Bundesverband Musikindustrie e.V. In cooperation with “Gesellschaft zur Verfolgung von Urheberrechtsverletzungen e.V.” (GVU) and “Börsenverein des Deutschen Buchhandels” (BöV). http://www.musikindustrie.de/fileadmin/news/publikationen/DCN-Studie_2011_Presseversion_FINAL_EN.pdf. Accessed 15 Aug 2016.
  3. Hargreaves, Ian. 2011. Digital opportunity A review of intellectual property and growth. UK Government Intellectual Property Office. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140603093549/http:/www.ipo.gov.uk/ipreview-finalreport.pdf. Accessed 15 Aug 2016.
  4. Johns, Adrian. 2010. Piracy: The intellectual property wars from Gutenberg to Gates, 1st ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Karaganis, Joe, ed. 2011. Media piracy in emerging economies. SSRC. http://piracy.americanassembly.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/MPEE-PDF-1.0.4.pdf. Accessed 15 Aug 2016.
  6. Karaganis, Joe, and Lennart Renkema. 2013. Copy culture in the US & Germany. Columbia University. The American Assembly. http://americanassembly.org/sites/default/files/download/publication/copy_culture.pdf. Accessed 15 Aug 2016.
  7. Kretschmer, Martin. 2011. Private copying and fair compensation: An empirical study of copyright levies in Europe. UK Intellectual Property Office. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/310183/ipresearch-faircomp-201110.pdf. Accessed 15 Aug 2016.
  8. Masnick, Michael, and Michael Ho. 2012. The sky is rising. Floor64. https://www.techdirt.com/skyisrising/. Accessed 15 Aug 2016.
  9. Mateus, Alexandre M., and Jon M. Peha. 2011. Quantifying global transfers of copyrighted content using BitTorrent. TPRC 2011 – The 39th Research Conference on Communication, Information and Internet Policy. Rochester: Social Science Research Network. http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1985737. Accessed 15 Aug 2016.
  10. Merrill, Stephen A., and William J. Raduchel. 2013. Copyright in the digital era: Building evidence for policy. National Research Council (U.S.). Washington, DC: National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/14686.Google Scholar
  11. Oberholzer-Gee, Felix, and Koleman Strumpf. 2007. The effect of file sharing on record sales: An empirical analysis. Journal of Political Economy 115(1): 1–42.Google Scholar
  12. Peitz, Martin, and Patrick Waelbroeck. 2004. The effect of Internet piracy on music sales: Cross section evidence. Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues 1(2): 71–79.Google Scholar
  13. Price, David. 2013. NetNames piracy analysis: Sizing the piracy universe. Netnames piracy analysis – v2.5. Commissioned by NBCUniversal. https://copyrightalliance.org/sites/default/files/2013-netnames-piracy.pdf. Accessed 15 Aug 2016.
  14. Rob, Rafael, and Joel Waldfogel. 2006. Piracy on the high C’s: Music downloading, sales displacement, and social welfare in a sample of college students. Journal of Law & Economics 49(1): 29–62.Google Scholar
  15. Sandvine. 2014. Global Internet Phenomena Report, 2H 2014. Sandvine Incorporated ULC. https://www.sandvine.com/downloads/general/global-internet-phenomena/2014/2h-2014-global-internet-phenomena-report.pdf. Accessed 15 Aug 2016.
  16. Sisario, Ben. 2014. CD-loving Japan resists move to online music. The New York Times, 16 Sept 2014. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/17/business/media/cd-loving-japan-resists-move-to-digital-music-.html?_r=0. Accessed 15 Aug 2016.
  17. Smith, Michael D., and Rahul Telang. 2012. Assessing the academic literature regarding the impact of media piracy on sales. Social Science Research Network. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2132153 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2132153. Accessed 15 Aug 2016.
  18. VanDerWerff, Todd. 2015. There will be more than 400 scripted TV series this year. That bubble’s bound to burst. http://www.vox.com/2015/9/14/9301867/peak-tv. Accessed 15 Aug 2016.
  19. Watson, Steven James, Daniel John Zizzo, and Piers Fleming. 2014. Determinants and welfare implications of unlawful file sharing: A scoping review. CREATe Working Paper 2014/05, April 2014. University of East Anglia. http://www.create.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Working-Paper-2014-15.pdf. Accessed 15 Aug 2016.
  20. Zentner, Alejandro. 2006. Measuring the effect of file sharing on music purchases. Journal of Law & Economics 49(1): 63–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The American AssemblyColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations