Advertisement

Möglichkeiten für Reformen

  • Marcus Matthias Keupp
Chapter

Zusammenfassung

Grundsätzlich kann jedes ökonomische System auf zwei Arten reformiert werden: Durch Veränderungen innerhalb des Institutionenbestandes oder durch dessen Ablösung (Buchanan und Tullock 1962; Buchanan 1990). Eine militärische Organisation kann daher versuchen, Reformen innerhalb des planwirtschaftlichen Systems umzusetzen, oder dieses System zugunsten eines alternativen Systems aufgeben. Innerhalb des planwirtschaftlichen Systems sind Reformen jedoch nur begrenzt möglich.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Acemoglu D, Johnson S (2005) Unbundling institutions. Journal of Political Economy 113:949–995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acemoglu D, Robinson J (2012) Why nations fail. Crown, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Balasubramanian P, Kulatilaka N, Storck J (2000). Managing information technology investments using a real-options approach. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 9:39-62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Battilana J, Leca B, Boxenbaum E (2009) How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Annals 3: 65-107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Becker GS (1993) Nobel lecture: The economic way of looking at behavior. Journal of Political Economy 101: 385-409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bendall HB, Stent AF (2007) Maritime investment strategies with a portfolio of real options. Maritime Policy Management 34: 441-452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bernholz P, Vaubel R (Eds) (2007) Political competition and economic regulation. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Boettke PJ, Coyne C, Leeson P (2013) Comparative historical political economy. Journal of Institutional Economics 9:285–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boettke PJ, Coyne CJ (2007) Saving government failure theory from itself: Recasting political economy from an Austrian perspective. Constitutional Political Economy 18:127–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boettke PJ, Coyne CJ (2009) Context matters: Institutions and entrepreneurship. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship 5: 135-209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boettke PJ (1998) Economic calculation: The Austrian contribution to political economy. Advances in Austrian Economics 5:131–58Google Scholar
  12. Borison A (2005). Real options analysis: Where are the emperor’s clothes? Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 17:17-31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Buchanan JM (1990) The domain of constitutional economics. Constitutional Political Economy 1:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Buchanan JM, Tullock G (1962) The calculus of consent. University of Michigan Press, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  15. Coyne CJ, Michaluk C, Reese R (2016) Unproductive entrepreneurship in US military contracting. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy 5: 221-239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Demsetz H (2002) Toward a theory of property rights II: The competition between private and collective ownership. Journal of Legal Studies 31 (Supplement S2):653-672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Denzau A, North D (1994) Shared mental models: Ideologies and institutions. Kyklos 47:3-31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. DiLorenzo T (1988) Competition and political entrepreneurship. Review of Austrian Economics 2:59-71Google Scholar
  19. Easterly W, Woolcock M, Ritzen J (2006) Social cohesion, institutions and growth. Economics and Politics 18: 103-120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ferejohn JA (1986) Incumbent performance and electoral control. Public Choice 50:5-25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fernandez R, Rodrik D (1991) Resistance to reform: Status quo bias in the presence of individualspecific uncertainty. American Economic Review 81:1146-1155Google Scholar
  22. Frey BS (1992) Efficiency and democratic political organisation: The case for the referendum. Journal of Public Policy 12:209-222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Frey BS, Bohnet I (1993) Democracy by competition: Referenda and federalism in Switzerland. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 23:71-81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Garud R, Hardy C, Maguire S (2007) Institutional entrepreneurship as embedded agency. Organization Studies 28:957–969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gibson WE, Morrell PS (2004) Theory and practice in aircraft financial evaluation. Journal of Air Transport Management 10:427-433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Greif A, Kingston C (2011) Institutions: rules or equilibria? In Schofield N, Caballero G (Eds) Political economy of institutions, democracy and voting. Springer, Berlin et al., 13-43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hayek FA (1944) Der Weg zur Knechtschaft. Mohr Siebeck, TübingenGoogle Scholar
  28. Hayek FA (1945) The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review 35:519–30Google Scholar
  29. Hayek FA (1948) Individualism: True and false. In Hayek FA (Ed) Individualism and economic order. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1-32Google Scholar
  30. Hayek FA (1967) Studies in philosophy, politics, and economics. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  31. Hayek FA (1978) Competition as a discovery procedure. In Hayek FA (Ed) New studies in philosophy, politics, economics and the history of ideas. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  32. Horwitz S (1998) Monetary calculation and Mises’s critique of planning. History of Political Economy, 30:427–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hume D (2000) A treatise of human nature. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Jerven M (2014) Economic growth and measurement reconsidered in Botswana, Kenya, Tanzania, and Zambia, 1965-1995. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kirzner I (1985) Capitalism and the discovery process. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  36. Lavoie D (2015) Rivalry and central planning: The socialist calculation debate reconsidered. Mercatus Center at George Mason University, ArlingtonGoogle Scholar
  37. Leeson PT (2008) Coordination without command: Stretching the scope of spontaneous order. Public Choice 135:67-78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Leeson PT, Coyne CJ, Boettke PJ (2006) Does the market self-correct? Review of Political Economy, 18:79–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Locke J (2014) Second treatise of Government: An essay concerning the true original, extent and end of civil government. John Wiley & Sons, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  40. Mathews S (2009) Valuing risky projects with real options. Research-Technology Management 52:32-41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Miller B, Clarke JP (2008) Strategic guidance in the development of new aircraft programs: A practical real options approach. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 55: 566-578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Miller DT (1999) The norm of self-interest. American Psychologist 54:1053–1060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Miller KD, Waller HG (2003) Scenarios, real options and integrated risk management. Long Range Planning 36:93–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. North DC (2005) Understanding the process of economic change. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  45. Ostrom E (2008) Design principles of robust property rights institutions: What have we learned? In Cole DH, McGinnis MD (Eds) Elinor Ostrom and the Bloomington school of political economy, Volume 2 (resource governance). Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham et al., 215-248Google Scholar
  46. Pennington M (2013) Robust political economy. Edward Elgar, NorthamptonGoogle Scholar
  47. Platteau JP (2000) Institutions, social norms, and economic development. Harwood Academic Publishers, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  48. Sarasvathy S (2008) Effectuation – elements of entrepreneurial expertise. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  49. Schreyögg G, Kliesch-Eberl M (2007) How dynamic can organizational capabilities be? Towards a dual-process model of capability dynamization. Strategic Management Journal 28:913–933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Smith A (2016) The theory of moral sentiments. Enhanced Media Publishing, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  51. Smith V (2003) Constructivist and ecological rationality in economics. American Economic Review 93:465-500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sobel RS, Coyne CJ (2011) Cointegrating institutions: The time-series properties of country institutional measures. Journal of Law and Economics 54:111-134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Solomon B, Chouinard P, Kerzner L (2008) The Department of National Defence strategic cost model, volume II – theory and empirics. Defence R&D Canada-CORA, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  54. Sowell T (1980) Knowledge and Decisions. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  55. Stirner M (1972) Der Einzige und sein Eigentum. Reclam, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  56. Swinnen J, Mathijs E (1997) Agricultural privatisation, land reform and farm restructuring in central and eastern Europe: A comparative analysis. In Swinnen J, Buckwell A, Mathijs E (Eds) Agricultural privatisation, land reform and farm restructuring in central and eastern Europe. Ashgate, Aldershot et al., 333-373Google Scholar
  57. Thomsen EF (1992) Prices and knowledge: A market-process perspective. Routledge, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Thonemann U (2010) Operations management. Pearson Studium, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  59. Trigeorgis L (1996) Real options, managerial flexibility and strategy in resource allocation. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  60. Tullock G (2002) Bureaucracy. In Tullock G, Seldon A, Brady G (Eds) Government failure: A primer in public choice. The Cato Institute, Washington DC, 43-51Google Scholar
  61. Vaubel R (1996) The constitutional future of the European Union. Constitutional political economy 7:317-324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wagner R (1966) Pressure groups and political entrepreneurs: A review essay. Public Choice 1: 161-170CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcus Matthias Keupp
    • 1
  1. 1.Militärakademie an der ETH ZürichZürichSchweiz

Personalised recommendations