Advertisement

Die Lage- und Bewegungsorientierung beim Fliegen

  • Siegfried J. Gerathewohl
  • Deutschen Aeronautischen Gesellschaft E. V.

Zusammenfassung

Die Voraussetzungen für die Lage- und Bewegungsorientierung beim Fliegen innerhalb der Atmosphäre sind insofern von den gleichen Vorgängen am Boden verschieden, als in der Luft die Erhaltung des Gleichgewichts von einem anderen tragenden Medium abhängt, in dem sich der Mensch mit Hilfe des Flugzeuges bewegt. Die Änderungen des Unterstützungsverhältnisses bedingt eine Veränderung der Sinnesmechanik und der Wahrnehmungsfunktionen derart, daß die Einwirkungen der Atmosphäre, die bei den Bewegungen am Boden praktisch keine Rolle spielen, den Bewegungsvorgang hauptsächlich bestimmen. Der Bewegungsvorgang ist notwendig für die Erhaltung des Gleichgewichtes und der Fluglage. Die Sinnesfunktionen, die an ihm beteiligt sind, sollen nun einer kurzen Betrachtung unterzogen werden.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Ausgewählte Literatur

  1. Armstrong, H. G., Haber, H., and Strughold, H., Aero Medical problems of space travel. Panel Meeting, SAM, Randolph Field, Texas. J. Aviat. Med. 5949, 20, 383.Google Scholar
  2. Asch, S. E., and Witkin, H. A., Studies in space orientation. I. Perception of the upright with displaced visual fields. J. Exper. Psychol. 1948, 38, 325.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, J. F., The visual perception of velocity. Psychol. Forsch. 1931, 14.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, R. H., Imus, H., Niven, J. I., and Graybiel, A., The relationship between apparent displacement and motion in the oculogyral illusion. USN SAM & Res. & Tulane Univ., Pensacola, Fla. May 1949.Google Scholar
  5. Campbell, P. A., Orientation in space. In: Space Medicine. Urbana, Ill. s955.Google Scholar
  6. Braun, W. v., Multi-stage rockets and artificial satelites. In: Space Medicine. Urbana, Ill. 1955.Google Scholar
  7. Clark, B., and Graybiel, A., Linear acceleration and deceleration as factors influencing non-visual orientation during flight. USN SAM & Res., Pensacola, Fla. 1947.Google Scholar
  8. Clark, B., and Graybiel, A., Apparent rotation of a fixed target associated with linear acceleration in flight. USN SAM & Res., Pensacola, Fla. 1947.Google Scholar
  9. Clark, B., and Graybiel, A., Studies of human adaptation to centrifugal force. 1. Visual perception of the horizontal. USN SAM & Res., Pensacola, Fla. 1949.Google Scholar
  10. Clark, B., and Graybiel, A., and Mac Corquodale, K., The illusory perception of movement caused by angular acceleration and by centrifugal force during flight. II: Visually perceived movement of a fixed target during turns. USN SAM, US Nay. Air Train. Base, Pensacola, Fla. 1946.Google Scholar
  11. Clark, B., and Graybiel, A., and Mac Corquodale, K., The effect of repaeted rotary acceleration on the oculo-gyral illusion. USN SAM & Res., Pensacola, Fla. 1948.Google Scholar
  12. Coermann, R., Die Wirkung von Schwingungen. Luftfahrmedizin 1938, 2, 295.Google Scholar
  13. Coermann, R., Untersuchungen über die Einwirkungen von Schwingungen auf den menschlichen Organismus. Luftfahrtmedizin 5940, 4, 73.Google Scholar
  14. Crook, M., Printed materials, maps and charts. In: Human Factors in Undersea Warfare, Chap 2 Nat. Res. Council, Washington, D. C. 5949.Google Scholar
  15. Earmark, N. O., Vibration, sonic and mechanical, action on Air Force personnel. Aero Med. Lab., Wright-Patterson Field, Air Mat. Comm., Information Rep. June 1951.Google Scholar
  16. Frey, M., Über die sinnlichen Grundlagen für die Wahrnehmung der Gliederbewegungen. Zschr. Biol. 1926, 84, 56z.Google Scholar
  17. Frey, M., Eine Bemerkung über den sogenannten Vibrationssinn. Zschr. Biol. 1927, 85, 539Google Scholar
  18. Gauer, O., and Haber, H., Man under gravity-free conditions. In: German Aviation World War II. Vol. I, 64,, 1950.Google Scholar
  19. Gerathewohl, S. J., Psychologische Untersuchungen zur Blindflugeignung. Zschr. angew. Psychol. 1944, 66, 36.Google Scholar
  20. Gerathewohl, S. J., Physics and psychophysics of weightlessness: Visual perception. J. Aviat. Med. 1952 (im Druck).Google Scholar
  21. Gibson, J. J., Perception and judgment of aerial space and distance as potential factors in pilot selection and training. AAF Aviat. Psychol. Program Res., Rep. 7, 1947.Google Scholar
  22. Gibson, J. J., Mowrer, O. H., Determinants of the perceived vertical and horizontal. Psychol. Rev. 1938, 45, 300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gibson, J. J., Radner, M., Adaptation after-effect, and contrast in the perception of tilted lines. I: Quantitative studies. J. Exper. Psychol. 1937, 20, 453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Graybiel, A., and Brown, R. H., The delay in visual reorientation following exposure to a change in direction of resultant force on a human centrifuge. Rep. 1. USN SAM & Tulane Univ., Pensacola, Fla. 1949.Google Scholar
  25. Graybiel, A., Clark, B., and MacCorquodale, K., The illusory perception of movement caused by angular acceleration and by centrifugal force during flight. USN SAM, Pensacola, Fla. 1946.Google Scholar
  26. Graybiel, A., Clark, B., and MacCorquodale, K., The illusory perception of movement caused by angular acceleration and by centrifugal force during flight. III.: Habituation and technique of assuming the turn as factors in illusory perception. USN SAM, Pensacola, Fla. July 1946.Google Scholar
  27. Graybiel, A., Clark, B., and MacCorquodale, K., The illusory perception of movement caused by angular acceleration and by centrifugal force during flight. IV.: The illusory rotation of a target during turns. USN SAM, Pensacola, Fla. September 1946.Google Scholar
  28. Graybiel, A., Clark, B., and MacCorquodale, K., and Hupp, D., The role of vestibular nystagmus in the visual perception of a moving target in the dark. USN SAM, Pensacola, Fla. January 1946.Google Scholar
  29. Graybiel, A., and Hupp, D., The oculo-gyral illusion. A form of apparent motion which may be observed following stimulation of the semi-circular canals. USN SAM, Pensacola, Fla. Nov. 1945.Google Scholar
  30. Graybiel, A., Kerr, W. A., Hupp, D., and Bartley, S. H., Threshold stimulation of the horizontal semi-circular canals in man with particular reference to the significance of the first derivative of angular acceleration as a stimulus. USN SAM, Pensacola, Fla, March 1947Google Scholar
  31. Guedry, F. E., The effect of visual stimulation on the duration of post-rotational apparent motion effects. J. Gen. Psychol. 1950, 43, 313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Haber, F., and Haber, H., Possible methods of producing the gravity-free state for medical research. J. Aviat. Med. 1950, 21, 395.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Haber, H., and Gerathewohl, S. J., Physics and psychophysics of weightlessness. J. Aviat. Med. 1951, 22, 180.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Kirschberg, L. SS., Depth perception and flying ability. Arch. ophthalm. 1946, 36.Google Scholar
  35. Kyrieleis, W., Einäugige als Flugzeugführer. Mitt. Luftfahrtmed. 1942, 3.Google Scholar
  36. Loeckle, W. E., Ober die Wirkung von Schwingungen auf das vegetative Nervensystem and die Eigenreflexe. Luftfahrtmedizin 1941, 5, 305.Google Scholar
  37. Mann, C. W., Studies in space perception. USN SAM & Tulane Univ., Joint Rep., Pensacola, Fla. October 1950.Google Scholar
  38. Metz, P., Die Orientierung beim Fliegen. Ber. XV. Kongr. Dtsch. Ges. Psychol. Jena 1936.Google Scholar
  39. Noble, C. E., The perception of the vertical. IV.: The visual vertical as a function of centrifugal and gravitational forces. J. Exper. Psychol. 1949, 39, 839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Passey, C. E., The perception of the vertical. X.: Adaptation effects in the adjustment of the visual vertical. USN SAM, Pensacola, Fla. 1950.Google Scholar
  41. Roscoe, S. N., Flight by periscope. Univ. of. Ill. Bull. 1951, 48, 55.Google Scholar
  42. Rose, H. W., Motion parallax as a factor of depth perception. Rep. NRC-Vision Comm., SAM Randolph Field, Texas Nov. 1948.Google Scholar
  43. Skramlik, E. v., Handbuch der niederen Sinne. I I. 1938.Google Scholar
  44. Strughold, H., The mechanoreceptors of skin and muscles under flying conditions. In: German Aviation Medicine World War II. Vol. II, 994, 1950.Google Scholar
  45. Tonndorf, J., Auditory perception in noise. J. Aviat. Med. 1951, 22, 491.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Tschermak-Seisenegg, H. u. G. Schubert, Über Vertikalorientierung im Rotatorium and im Flugzeug. Pflügers Arch. Physiol. 1931, 228, 234.Google Scholar
  47. Vinacke, W. E., The concept of aviators vertigo. USN SAM, Pensacola, Fla. May 1946.Google Scholar
  48. Vinacke, W. E., Illusions experienced by aircraft pilots while flying. Nay. Air Train. Bases, Pensacola, Fla. May 1946.Google Scholar
  49. Vinacke, W. E., Predicting the susceptibility of aviators to „vertigo“. A preliminary study. Nay. Train. Air Bases, Pensacola, Fla. June 1946.Google Scholar
  50. Vinacke, W. E., „Vertigo“ as experienced by naval aviators. Nay. Air Train. Bases, Pensacola, Fla. July 1946.Google Scholar
  51. Wing, C. W., and Passey, G. E., The perception of the vertical. XI.: The visual vertical under conflicting visual and acceleratory factors. USN SAM & Tulane Univers., Joint Project, Pensacola, Fla. 1950.Google Scholar
  52. Witkin, H. A., Perception of the upright when the direction of the force acting on the body is changed. J. Exper. Psychol. 1950, 40, 93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Witkin, H. A., and Asch, S. E., Studies in space orientation. III.: Perception of the upright in the absence of a visual field. J. Exper. Psychol. 1948, 38, 603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wulfften-Palthe, E., Zintuidelijke en psychische functies tijdens het vliegen. Handb. Neurol. d. Ohres 1926, 3, 1926.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Johann Ambrosius Barth-München 1953

Authors and Affiliations

  • Siegfried J. Gerathewohl
    • 1
  • Deutschen Aeronautischen Gesellschaft E. V.
  1. 1.New BraunfelsUSA

Personalised recommendations