Advertisement

Magnetic dynamics of small α-Fe2O3 and NiO particles studied by neutron scattering

  • K. Lefmann
  • F. Bødker
  • M. F. Hansen
  • H. Vázquez
  • N. B. Christensen
  • P.-A. Lindgård
  • K. N. Clausen
  • S. Mørup
Conference paper

Abstract

We have studied the magnetic dynamics in nanocrystalline samples of α-Fe2O3 (hematite) and NiO by inelastic neutron scattering. By measuring around the structural and the antiferromagnetic reflections, we have probed uniform and staggered magnetic oscillations, respectively. In the hematite particles, we observed a clear double peak in the energy distribution of the antiferromagnetic signal, in addition to a quasi-elastic peak: We interpret the double peak to represent collective magnetic excitations. Broadening of the central quasi-elastic peak with increasing temperature is interpreted as a sign of superparamagnetic relaxation. Studies of the antiferromagnetic signal from NiO also show evidence of collective magnetic excitations, but with a higher energy of the precession states than for hematite. The inelastic signal at the structural reflection of NiO presents evidence for uniform magnetic oscillations very similar to the antiferromagnetic signal, as is expected for a simple antiferromag,nét. The hematite sample did not show any signs of uniform oscillations, although these have been predicted theoretically.

PACS

75.50.Tt Fine-particle systems 76.60.Es Relaxation effects 78.30.Nx Neutron inelastic scattering 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    see, e.g., J.L. Dormano, D. Ficrani (Eds.): Magnetic Properties of Fine Particles ( North-Holland, Amsterdam 1992 )Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. Neel: Ann. Geophys. 5, 99 (1949);Google Scholar
  3. W.F. Brown, Jr.: Phys. Rev. 130, 1677 (1963)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. M. Hennion et al.: Europhys. Lett. 25, 43 (1994)Google Scholar
  5. M.F. Hansen et al.: Phys. Rev, Lett. 79, 4910 (1997)Google Scholar
  6. 5.
    A.H. Merrish. Canted Antiferromagnetism: Hematite ( World Scientific, Singapore 1994 )Google Scholar
  7. 6.
    F. Bodker et al.: to appear in Phys. Rev. B (2000)Google Scholar
  8. 7.
    W.L. Roth: Phys. Rev. 110, 1133 (1958)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 8.
    R.H. Kodama, S.A. Makhlouf, A.E. Berkowitz: Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1393 (1997)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 9.
    See, e.g., G.L. Squires: Introduction to the Theory of Thermal Neutron Scattering ( Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1978 )Google Scholar
  11. 10.
    T.E. Mason et al.: Can. J. Phys. 73, 697 (1995);ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. K.N. Clausen et al.: Physica B 241–243, 50 (1998)Google Scholar
  13. 11.
    M.F. Hansen: Magnetic Properties of Systems of Magnetic Nanoparticles ( Ph.D. thesis, Technical University of Denmark, 1998 )Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Lefmann
    • 1
  • F. Bødker
    • 2
  • M. F. Hansen
    • 2
  • H. Vázquez
    • 1
    • 3
  • N. B. Christensen
    • 1
  • P.-A. Lindgård
    • 1
  • K. N. Clausen
    • 1
  • S. Mørup
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Condensed Matter Physics and ChemistryRisø National LaboratoryRoskildeDenmark
  2. 2.Department of PhysicsTechnical University of DenmarkLyngbyDenmark
  3. 3.Department of PhysicsUniversidad Autonóma de MadridSpain

Personalised recommendations