Changes in Operant Behavior During Deprivation- and Antagonist-Induced Withdrawal States

  • J. H. Woods
  • D. A. Downs
  • J. E. Villarreal
Conference paper
Part of the Bayer-Symposium book series (BAYER-SYMP, volume 4)


A series of repeated administrations of morphine will produce a state of dependence in most mammalian species. Morphine dependence is identified by a characteristic, unique set of behavorial, somatic, sympathetic, and parasympathetic signs known as the withdrawal syndrome when the organism is either deprived of morphine or when a morphine antagonist (e.g., nalorphine, naloxone) is administered. In rhesus monkeys which have received a series of morphine injections (3 mg/kg sc., q6h) for a month or more, deprivation-induced withdrawal signs are minimally evident following 12 hours of deprivation and become maximal at 32–48 hours of deprivation (Seevers and Deneau, 1963). The antagonist-induced syndrome begins within minutes following subcutaneous antagonist administration and the total reaction may be complete within 2–4 hours if the dose is moderate (Seevers and Deneau, 1963). The difference in time course of these methods of inducing withdrawal signs is the major distinguishing characteristic since the pattern of signs is otherwise remarkably comparable. It has been shown that in animals with a history of morphine administration changes in behavior produced by antagonists may be found under conditions where overt deprivation-induced withdrawal changes are not demonstrable. For example, operant behavoir (Goldberg and Schuster, 1969) may provide additional distinguishing characteristics of the different methods of inducing withdrawal signs.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Deneau, G. A., Yanagita, T., Seevers, M. H.: Self-administration of psychoactive substances by the monkey: A measure of psychological dependence. Psychopharmacologia (Berl.) 16, 30–48 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Goldberg, S. R., Hoffmeister, F., Schlichting, U., Wuttke, W.: Aversive properties of nalorphine and naloxone in morphine-dependent rhesus monkeys. J. Pharmacol. exp. Ther. 179, 268–276 (1971).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Goldberg, S. R., and Schuster, C. R.: Conditioned suppression by a stimulus associated with nalorphine in morphine-dependent monkeys. J. exp. Anal. Behay. 10, 235–242 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Goldberg, S. R., and Schuster, C. R.: Nalorphine: Increased sentitivity of monkeys formerly dependent on morphine. Science 166, 1548–1549 (1969).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Goldberg, S. R., Woods, J. H., Schuster, C. R.: Morphine: Conditioned increases in self-administration in rhesus monkeys. Science 166, 1306–1307 (1969).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Goldberg, S. R., Woods, J. H., Schuster, C. R.: Nalorphine-induced changes in morphine self-administration in rhesus monkeys. J. Pharmacol. exp. Ther. 176, 464–471 (1971).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hoffmeister, R., Schlichting, U.: Reinforcing properties of some opiates and opioids in rhesus monkeys with histories of cocaine and codeine self-administration. Psychopharmacologia (Berl.) 23, 55–74 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Schuster, C. R., Woods, J. H.: The conditioned reinforcing effects of stimuli associated with morphine reinforcement. Int. J. Addict. 3, 223–230 (1968).Google Scholar
  9. Seevers, M. H., Deneau, G. A.: Physiological aspects of tolerance and dependence. In: Room, W. S., Hoffman, F. G. (Eds.): Physiological Pharmacology, pp. 565–640. New York: Academic Press 1963.Google Scholar
  10. Thompson, T., Schuster, C. R.: Morphine self-administration, food-reinforced, and avoidance behaviors in rhesus monkeys. Psychopharmacologia (Berl.) 5, 87–94 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Weeks, J. R.: Experimental morphine addiction: Method for automatic intravenous injections in unrestrained rats. Science 138, 143–144 (1962).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Weeks, J. R. and COLLINS, R. J.: Factors affecting voluntary morphine intake in self-maintained addicted rats. Psychopharmacologia (Berl.) 6, 267–279 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Woons, J. H., Schuster, C. R.: Opiates as reinforcing stimuli. In: Thompson, T., Pickens, R. (Eds.): The Stimulus Properties of Drugs, pp. 163–175. New York: Appleton-CenturyCrofts 1971.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. H. Woods
    • 1
  • D. A. Downs
  • J. E. Villarreal
  1. 1.Department of PharmacologyUniversity of Michigan Medical SchoolAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations